NYIntensity wrote:
BagBoy wrote:
#2 for me.
Can you give reasons why? I'm not doubting your choice, just curious and trying to encourage some conversation
Certainly.
First of all, I can't see any way I'll vote for any of the GOP candidates. As far as I can tell, they are completely in love with regressive taxation.
Yes, I'm a little disappointed with Obama, but I'm not going to sulk about it and stay home and not vote for him. That's especially true considering I live in NC, which could go either way. Staying home would be cutting off my nose to spite my face (jeez, that's such a stupid expression, but you get the idea).
I'm disappointed with Obama, because he has been on the defensive from day 1. There are some incredibly stupid and inflammatory things that have come out of the mouths of GOP members of Congress during his term, but he never started calling bullshit on any of it until very recently. Yes, things would be tough for any prez the last 3 years, but he should have been touting the things he has managed to accomplish from the beginning. The stimulus, for example, did not keep us below 9% unemployment - true. But it preserved and created (mostly preserved) a couple or 3 million jobs (I don't know the exact amount, but it's well documented by the Congressional Budget Office). There's bin Laden. There's Libya. The fact that he's not taking enough credit for things like this makes him look weak, and then the rabble only increases, especially with Libya. FFS, what's wrong with letting the French and Italians patrol their own goddamn back yard? They are our allies, aren't they? And don't we have enough fucking "boots on the ground" elsewhere? Yet, the GOP says "he's leading from behind". Well it turns out he handled Libya quite well if you ask me. I don't want the US to be a policeman. However, he's not talking about it enough!
I must admit though that I think in some ways he has been leading from behind on some domestic issues. And that whole healthcare thing was a disaster. It was a noble idea. Most of my family lives in Canada and they all appreciate their national healthcare.
--BTW, in spite of the costs for nationalized healthcare in Canada, my relatives in Ontario are paying about the same taxes we are (unless you're rich!). How do they do that? It's pretty easy. Don't spend trillions on defense.--
Anyway, he should have known that any healthcare bill that came through Congress would be a bastardized rancid piece of old sausage by the time it got out. And it was. It just isn't time for nationalized healthcare in the US right now, and it might not ever be. Obama really wasted a lot of political capital on that one.
I know the left have been disappointed with Obama making compromises and trying to work with GOP members of Congress, but I'm not. Hell, I'd say every prez since (and including) Reagan have made compromises that were upsetting to their bases. That's fine with me. I think that's part of the prez's job.
Anyway, #2 for me.