It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 6:53 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:11 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7475
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
I didn't even know that was possible.
So not only did we burn his entry level contract year on 1/2 a season, we burned it on a handful of games.
We suck.


_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
AudSabres
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:41 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:35 pm
Posts: 4998
Location: In your head, producing very weird thoughts.
At least when Quebec's season is over, he goes to Rochester and can be recalled. Hopefully the top of the roster looks different if/when that time comes. Given how much ice time he's seen and the pairings he's had in recent times, I guess the writing was on the wall that it would be Grigo being moved. They really dropped the ball with the kid's placement on the roster and who his line mates were.

I'm not upset with the demotion; I'm pissed off with how the kid and his situation have been mishandled since they decided to keep him up.

_________________
If it's a tight squeeze, spit on it! - NyI

He's a middling AHL player who had the good fortune of a drunk arbitrator. - The Squanto re: Tim Kennedy


Top
 Profile  
 
BagBoy
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:45 pm 
Offline
Face-Off Specialist
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 713
Location: Greensboro, NC via 14052
AudSabres wrote:
I'm pissed off with how the kid and his situation have been mishandled since they decided to keep him up.

Me, too.

_________________
This time, like all times, is a very good one, if we but know what to do with it.
--Emerson


Top
 Profile  
 
Stuuuuuuu
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:47 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 2876
Location: Portland, Oregano
I fucking said this, even without knowing anything about the kid. Most 18 year-olds don't have what it takes to be a successful NHL center. It was a stupid call not to send him back at the beginning of the season. Now he might consider his first NHL experience a failure, and that could hurt his confidence.


Top
 Profile  
 
Jammerz04
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:18 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1254
Stuuuuuuu wrote:
I fucking said this, even without knowing anything about the kid. Most 18 year-olds don't have what it takes to be a successful NHL center. It was a stupid call not to send him back at the beginning of the season. Now he might consider his first NHL experience a failure, and that could hurt his confidence.


praying to god it won't. guy should be unstoppable in a few years time.

_________________
"If you want to know what I've been doing lately, I've been driving around from Tim Horton's to Tim Horton's, rolling up the rim. Haven't won anything yet. Thanks." - Lindy Ruff


Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:30 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
I'm not really getting why anyone cares, from what I could see the kid simply does not have 'it'.

Now Brian Flynn? Where did this guy come from? He's got it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:32 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7475
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
I'm not really getting why anyone cares, from what I could see the kid simply does not have 'it'.

Because everyone figured that out before his contract kicked in, except Lindy and Darcy.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
BlueandYellow
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:41 pm 
Offline
Hart Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 9770
Location: Buffalo, NY
We don't know if he has *it*. Playing six minutes a night with John Scott and Scoreless Stafford then getting benched isn't exactly enough to correctly get information on the guy.

Going back to juniors is probably best. At least he'll play and not sit on the bench.

_________________
"Counting all the assholes in the room, I'm definitely not alone!" ~ Michael Poulsen, Volbeat, Still Standing.


Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:54 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
BlueandYellow wrote:
We don't know if he has *it*. Playing six minutes a night with John Scott and Scoreless Stafford then getting benched isn't exactly enough to correctly get information on the guy.

Going back to juniors is probably best. At least he'll play and not sit on the bench.



I don't think Flynn is getting quality minutes or linemates, but is showing the spark that is so UTTERLY absent in Grigs. If there was something there to see, he'd have shown it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:43 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
Flynn is also not an 18 year old kid, he is a 24 year old man who is at best a third line player. You know why our third line is dangerous with Flynn, Porter, and Foligno, because two of the three will never be a first or second line players in their career in the NHL. They need to always hustle and give energy for the other guys to stay on an NHL roster.

Grigorenko on the other hand has the skill and ability to win scoring titles and to be a superstar in the NHL. I'm glad he got sent back down and don't care about burning a year on his contract. If he's smart he knows what it takes to make it in the NHL now and will only strive to make his game better. He's going to be on this team next year for an entire 82 game season. He was kinda rushed this year, but it's the biggest learning experience someone can have. Yes his linemates sucked, but you don't start on the first line of a team with a Cody Hodgson and Tyler Ennis on it.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
BlueandYellow
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:51 pm 
Offline
Hart Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 9770
Location: Buffalo, NY
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
BlueandYellow wrote:
We don't know if he has *it*. Playing six minutes a night with John Scott and Scoreless Stafford then getting benched isn't exactly enough to correctly get information on the guy.

Going back to juniors is probably best. At least he'll play and not sit on the bench.



I don't think Flynn is getting quality minutes or linemates, but is showing the spark that is so UTTERLY absent in Grigs. If there was something there to see, he'd have shown it.

Really? Flynn has gotten over 12 mins each game except for last game.

_________________
"Counting all the assholes in the room, I'm definitely not alone!" ~ Michael Poulsen, Volbeat, Still Standing.


Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:26 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
BlueandYellow wrote:
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
BlueandYellow wrote:
We don't know if he has *it*. Playing six minutes a night with John Scott and Scoreless Stafford then getting benched isn't exactly enough to correctly get information on the guy.

Going back to juniors is probably best. At least he'll play and not sit on the bench.



I don't think Flynn is getting quality minutes or linemates, but is showing the spark that is so UTTERLY absent in Grigs. If there was something there to see, he'd have shown it.

Really? Flynn has gotten over 12 mins each game except for last game.


Really? Well that makes sense, guys been playing great! :)


Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:31 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Flynn is also not an 18 year old kid, he is a 24 year old man who is at best a third line player. You know why our third line is dangerous with Flynn, Porter, and Foligno, because two of the three will never be a first or second line players in their career in the NHL. They need to always hustle and give energy for the other guys to stay on an NHL roster.

Grigorenko on the other hand has the skill and ability to win scoring titles and to be a superstar in the NHL. I'm glad he got sent back down and don't care about burning a year on his contract. If he's smart he knows what it takes to make it in the NHL now and will only strive to make his game better. He's going to be on this team next year for an entire 82 game season. He was kinda rushed this year, but it's the biggest learning experience someone can have. Yes his linemates sucked, but you don't start on the first line of a team with a Cody Hodgson and Tyler Ennis on it.



Man, I really hope you're right. But he doesn't seem anything close to a scoring title winner ATM.


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 1:52 am 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Flynn is also not an 18 year old kid, he is a 24 year old man who is at best a third line player. You know why our third line is dangerous with Flynn, Porter, and Foligno, because two of the three will never be a first or second line players in their career in the NHL. They need to always hustle and give energy for the other guys to stay on an NHL roster.

Grigorenko on the other hand has the skill and ability to win scoring titles and to be a superstar in the NHL. I'm glad he got sent back down and don't care about burning a year on his contract. If he's smart he knows what it takes to make it in the NHL now and will only strive to make his game better. He's going to be on this team next year for an entire 82 game season. He was kinda rushed this year, but it's the biggest learning experience someone can have. Yes his linemates sucked, but you don't start on the first line of a team with a Cody Hodgson and Tyler Ennis on it.



Man, I really hope you're right. But he doesn't seem anything close to a scoring title winner ATM.

Not many 18 year olds can get close.

His biggest downfall right now is his skating. He's a powerful skater, but it's his weakness. He seems a bit slow out there. I think a good offseason training regiment on skating will do wonders for his game. Look at Hodgson this year, worked with Gary Roberts and his skating is vastly improved now and he's close to a PPG player if not at it now.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
Vanek_Fanatic_26
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:24 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:24 am
Posts: 1998
Location: Buffalo
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
BlueandYellow wrote:
We don't know if he has *it*. Playing six minutes a night with John Scott and Scoreless Stafford then getting benched isn't exactly enough to correctly get information on the guy.

Going back to juniors is probably best. At least he'll play and not sit on the bench.



I don't think Flynn is getting quality minutes or linemates, but is showing the spark that is so UTTERLY absent in Grigs. If there was something there to see, he'd have shown it.


Flynn is getting about 15:00 a night.

_________________
Girgensons for captain. Team Keep Nick DesLauriers forever.

@TJLuckman550


Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:55 am 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
So grigs has averaged 9:44/game, Flynn has had 13:50/game


Is anyone actually saying that 4 minutes a game is the difference here? As if, had grigs just had a little extra time, THEN he would have shown something?

(edit) I just looked it up, FLynn has only had 6 games here, Grigs has played 22. So in total time on ice Grigs has had WAAAAY more of it than Flynn. So, ice-time argument...not buyin it.


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:12 am 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
Ok, being the devils advocate here. What makes you think he is able to win goal scoring titles? What has he done other than is 40 goals he score last season and the 29 this season? Yes, he has had an impressive season and a half in the Quebec league but why does that mean he will do something great in the NHL? How many GREAT players in the lower leagues end up busting???? Look at Vanek, he WAS a 40 goal scorer in the NHL for one season. Now, he's a 20 goal scorer at best.....

We all know that Rolston is very good with developing young talent and he most likely told Darcy to send him back. That he needs more time to develop.

Grig's struggled mightily this season. I reserve judgment on this kid until he can prove that he can handle the NHL.

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:29 am 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
sabresindc wrote:
Ok, being the devils advocate here. What makes you think he is able to win goal scoring titles? What has he done other than is 40 goals he score last season and the 29 this season? Yes, he has had an impressive season and a half in the Quebec league but why does that mean he will do something great in the NHL? How many GREAT players in the lower leagues end up busting???? Look at Vanek, he WAS a 40 goal scorer in the NHL for one season. Now, he's a 20 goal scorer at best.....

We all know that Rolston is very good with developing young talent and he most likely told Darcy to send him back. That he needs more time to develop.

Grig's struggled mightily this season. I reserve judgment on this kid until he can prove that he can handle the NHL.

Vanek has scored 40 goals twice in his career, scored 30 twice in his career and 20 three times. And with 14 goals in 24 games, he is on pace for 47 in a full 82 game season.

You're argument just became invalid.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
BlueandYellow
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:12 am 
Offline
Hart Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 9770
Location: Buffalo, NY
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
So grigs has averaged 9:44/game, Flynn has had 13:50/game


Is anyone actually saying that 4 minutes a game is the difference here? As if, had grigs just had a little extra time, THEN he would have shown something?

(edit) I just looked it up, FLynn has only had 6 games here, Grigs has played 22. So in total time on ice Grigs has had WAAAAY more of it than Flynn. So, ice-time argument...not buyin it.

Grigs playing more games means nothing. If he is playing very little per game it doesn't matter HOW many games you play him.

And by the way, yes, playing 4 or 5 minutes a game DOES indeed make a difference especially if one guy gets played 6-9 minutes quite often and the other guy gets around 13-15

_________________
"Counting all the assholes in the room, I'm definitely not alone!" ~ Michael Poulsen, Volbeat, Still Standing.


Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:10 am 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
BlueandYellow wrote:
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
So grigs has averaged 9:44/game, Flynn has had 13:50/game


Is anyone actually saying that 4 minutes a game is the difference here? As if, had grigs just had a little extra time, THEN he would have shown something?

(edit) I just looked it up, FLynn has only had 6 games here, Grigs has played 22. So in total time on ice Grigs has had WAAAAY more of it than Flynn. So, ice-time argument...not buyin it.

Grigs playing more games means nothing. If he is playing very little per game it doesn't matter HOW many games you play him.

And by the way, yes, playing 4 or 5 minutes a game DOES indeed make a difference especially if one guy gets played 6-9 minutes quite often and the other guy gets around 13-15



I'm really failing to see how an additional 4 minutes a game is going to be the deciding factor between whether you show something or not. I think 9 minutes on the ice over the course of a game is enough to show SOME spark of talent, or NHL readiness. He really didn't do that. I'm certainly no hockey expert, but I just don't see him performance changing with a few more minutes per game to flounder around.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron