It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 5:01 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
Stuuuuuuu
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:26 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 2876
Location: Portland, Oregano
I just called both my Senators' offices and told them that if they don't support a public option, I won't be supporting them in their future Senate runs.


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:29 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Stuuuuuuu wrote:
I just called both my Senators' offices and told them that if they don't support a public option, I won't be supporting them in their future Senate runs.

Ditto.

The same goes for President Obama. No health care with a public option means no vote for Obama in 2012 from my family.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:31 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
OK, at the risk of sounding like an ignoramus, I would like someone more knowledgeable on the topic to inform me of what exactly the "public option" is. *runs/hides*

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Stuuuuuuu
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:37 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 2876
Location: Portland, Oregano
It's government-provided health insurance. The idea being that private health insurance is too expensive for many who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid, the current government program of health insurance for the poor. So a "public option" would provide insurance to those who can't afford health insurance, and also give private insurers the motivation for lowering their ridiculous rates because if they don't, they could lose their customers to the public option.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:42 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
OK, that's what I thought. Thanks for that.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Stuuuuuuu
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:50 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 2876
Location: Portland, Oregano
Godzilla1960 wrote:
Stuuuuuuu wrote:
I just called both my Senators' offices and told them that if they don't support a public option, I won't be supporting them in their future Senate runs.

Ditto.

The same goes for President Obama. No health care with a public option means no vote for Obama in 2012 from my family.

Well, to be fair a lot of it is out of Obama's hands since he can only sign or reject what comes to his desk. But I feel kind of similarly. If Congress doesn't include a public option, Obama should veto it and send it back until they do. That's what Ralph Nader would do. If Obama doesn't, I can just go back to voting Ralph.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:00 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
The "public option" is a euphemism for the death of private health insurance.

Better than that, your tax dollars are going to end up subsidizing the public "option" whether you use it or not.

But don't worry, people will tell you it's actually going to drive down costs and increase "competition". Because we all know how much the federal government just loves fair competition.

IIRC, I'll give props to Zilla...he doesn't really want a public option...he wants single payer (universal, like in the UK). And I say bully to that...if you're going to revolutionize a huge part of society you might as well go gangbusters right?

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:01 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Stuuuuuuu wrote:
Well, to be fair a lot of it is out of Obama's hands since he can only sign or reject what comes to his desk.

Obama's #1 mistake was letting the idiots in the house write this pile of poo.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:24 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Crosscheck wrote:
The "public option" is a euphemism for the death of private health insurance.


Let's hope so. When private health insurance is dead my response will be the same as Kinky Friedman's when he was asked to comment on Richard Nixon's death. He said, let's dig him up and drive a stake through his heart, just to make sure.

That is how I feel about the private insurance companies. Those guys commit murder for profit, as far as I'm concerned.

Crosscheck wrote:
IIRC, I'll give props to Zilla...he doesn't really want a public option...he wants single payer (universal, like in the UK). And I say bully to that...if you're going to revolutionize a huge part of society you might as well go gangbusters right?


Image

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:34 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Godzilla1960 wrote:
Those guys commit murder for profit, as far as I'm concerned.

You saw this right?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091025/ap_ ... _insurance

For all the demonizing of insurance companies for making a profit...they have 2.2% profit margins.
A CEO of a traditional company would be fired for only returning 2.2% profit margins.
They're not gouging anyone...a sample of other industries and their profit margins:
Quote:
Tupperware Brands, 7.5 percent;
Yahoo, 5.9 percent;
Hershey, 6.1 percent;
Clorox, 8.7 percent;
Molson Coors Brewing, 8.1 percent;
construction and farm machinery, 5 percent;
Yum Brands (think KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell), 8.5 percent.


We're not exactly talking about robber barons here no matter how much Democrats try to shit on them.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:23 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Crosscheck wrote:
Godzilla1960 wrote:
Those guys commit murder for profit, as far as I'm concerned.

You saw this right?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091025/ap_ ... _insurance

For all the demonizing of insurance companies for making a profit...they have 2.2% profit margins.
A CEO of a traditional company would be fired for only returning 2.2% profit margins.
They're not gouging anyone...a sample of other industries and their profit margins:
Quote:
Tupperware Brands, 7.5 percent;
Yahoo, 5.9 percent;
Hershey, 6.1 percent;
Clorox, 8.7 percent;
Molson Coors Brewing, 8.1 percent;
construction and farm machinery, 5 percent;
Yum Brands (think KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell), 8.5 percent.


We're not exactly talking about robber barons here no matter how much Democrats try to shit on them.

Ah, tricky things, those facts and figures. Especially when figuring "profit."

NPR did a fact check of the fact checkers and found that if you measure profit against total health care spending (not company revenues), then your figures are pretty accurate, Cross.

However, this does not count the 15-20% that insurance companies skim off for administrative costs and big wig bonuses and salaries. Over the last 10 years, insurance companies have been spending less on medical care and more on administrative costs and bonuses.

Last year the top five earning insurance companies spent an average of more than 18% of their revenues on marketing, administration, and profits. Some companies are spending 40% on "administration, marketing, and profits," leaving only 60% of their revenue for actual medical care.

Surely, a public option can do better.

Between January and March health-care firms and their lobbyists spent an average of $1.4 million A DAY to try to kill health care reform.

That money must come from somewhere.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:36 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Godzilla1960 wrote:
Surely, a public option can do better.

Yeah, let me know how that works out. If it's a huge success we can put it up in the big government hall of fame with their other fiscally sound achievements:
Social Security
USPS
Fanny and Freddie
Medicare
Medicaid

Never underestimate the ability of the federal government to fuck things up.
They've been buying bankrupt companies lately...surely they must know something I don't know.

Oh...and it looks like now it's not just Lieberman digging in his heels...the blue dogs are getting testy.
http://www.ajc.com/business/dem-moderat ... 75099.html

Looks like Reid rubbed a lot of people the wrong way yesterday when he said the Senate would pass a public option.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:51 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Crosscheck wrote:
Godzilla1960 wrote:
Surely, a public option can do better.

Yeah, let me know how that works out.


No need to wait. Let's compare cost vs. effectiveness:

UNITED STATES: 15.9% of GDP, $6,657 per capita

BRAZIL: 7.9% of GDP, $371 per capita

CANADA: 9.7% of GDP, $3,430 per capita

CHINA: 4.7% of GDP, $81 per capita

FRANCE: 11.1% of GDP, $3,807 per capita

GERMANY: 10.7% of GDP, $3,628 per capita

INDIA: 5.0% of GDP, $36 per capita

ISRAEL: 7.9% of GDP, $1,533 per capita

JAPAN: 8.2% of GDP, $2,936 per capita

MEXICO: 6.4% of GDP, $474 per capita

SOUTH AFRICA: 8.7% of GDP, $437 per capita

SWEDEN: 8.9% of GDP, $3,598 per capita

RUSSIAN FEDERATION: 5.2% of GDP, $277 per capita

UNITED KINGDOM: 8.2% of GDP, $3,064 per capita

http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNe ... Z320090601

As you can see, nobody pays what we do for health care. If only we also got the best health care for all that money we spend, but alas, in a World Health Organization comparison of the health care systems of 191 countries we rank #37!

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... lth-care-/

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
End The Curse
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:52 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 3798
Location: Boca Raton
Crosscheck, when will you realize that resistance is futile? Game, set, match...now go learn to love your new big brother.

_________________
Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, when you're perfect in every way. I can't wait to look in the mirror, 'cause I get better looking each day. To know me is to love me, I must be a hell of a man. Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, but I'm doin' the best that I can.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:58 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
That list has nothing to do with "effectiveness".

I'd rather be sick here than in China...because I'm sure they do a bang-up job spending $81 per capita.
Or India at $36 per capita.

What's that get you, a band-aid and an aspirin?

EDIT: yeah, we're ranked 37th with no consideration for population size. :roll:
We're totally getting out asses kicked by Luxembourg, Colombia, Cyprus, Morocco, Dominica and Costa Rica.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:04 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Crosscheck wrote:
That list has nothing to do with "effectiveness".

I'd rather be sick here than in China...because I'm sure they do a bang-up job spending $81 per capita.
Or India at $36 per capita.

What's that get you, a band-aid and an aspirin?

Ah, you missed the second half of the post. Yes, we spend the most on health care.

As to effectiveness, we rank 37th.

No, I wouldn't pick India or China as alternatives, but I sure would take the health care system of Canada, the UK, Germany, France, or just about any Western European nation over what we have, which is a for profit system where health care providers make more money for not treating patients.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:50 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Godzilla1960 wrote:
No, I wouldn't pick India or China as alternatives, but I sure would take the health care system of Canada, the UK, Germany, France, or just about any Western European nation over what we have, which is a for profit system where health care providers make more money for not treating patients.

Those are all horrible, horrible examples of health care systems that work.

I'll say it again...Switzerland!

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:28 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
OH MY FUCKING GOD,

I happen to be a business owner and employee quite a bit of people, and if you think for 1 split second that the "Public Health Option" is good for the nation you are out of your fucking mind.

I cannot believe you people do not do your homework. You guys appear intellegent, but after reading this, I can see that brain power is out of the window in favor of a group (democrat or republican it does not matter).

Torte reform in conjuction with "FREE MARKETS" is the key here guys and gals.
If you expect my company to take up the slack on this plan your putting me out of business along with 172 jobs. And thats just for starters.

You cannot be serious, come on folks, read the bill, do the math. Hell, I'll even show you my records and what its going to do to companies such as mine. Small business wil be killed on this plan. Take responsibility for yourselves for gods sake. Or is that to much to ask.

And by the way, I make less then $100,000 a year. Come on now.
As far as comparing it to GDP, you fuckin lie, straight out. GDP does not and never has been a successful measuring tool for a social program, thats pure fuckin media garbage. You want to know where to get real figures, go to the CBO, state budget office, small business accuator and the incubator programs that exist with records.

Any false promise you think is warranted on this public option program is bullshit. You'll put me (a renewable energy company) out of business. You may not like the truth, but it is what it is.

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: