NYIntensity wrote:
It wasn't the OKC thing that "lost" me; I would still probably vote for Paul. My loss of faith is much more based on the fact that all of these newsletters are ammo against him, and while Romney and Gingrich are corrupt as a 15 year old hard drive, they don't have dirt like this.
Did anyone actually read the newsletters? Does anyone take into consideration that Paul receives more votes from minorities than any other candidate in the GOP?
The media is taking these newsletters and turning them into something they're not. For example, here's what the national media quoted:
"...I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in [Washington DC] are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."
The FULL quote:
"Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."
He was referring to the PREJUDICE against minorities in America's court systems, and how there's a much higher incarceration rate for minorities in DC than there are for whites who commit the same crimes. He was speaking out FOR minorities.
It's all bull shit. Paul is not a racist. He's the only guy out of all the candidates that would have vetoed NDAA. He's the guy that wants to let you to keep the money you've earned. He's the guy that wants to simplify economics and stop allowing the government to artificially fluctuate what happens to free markets, so as banksters and professional investors can't take advantage of every day Americans.
Simply put, he's the only candidate who's really looking out for your best interests. It's too bad more people don't see that.