It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 6:02 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
nnyfan
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:17 pm 
Offline
Textbook Grinder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:10 am
Posts: 484
Location: 1000 Islands
End The Curse wrote:
Sorry if that was offensive, NNYFan, but I just couldn't resist!


OMG...it takes a LOT more than THAT to offend me. :lol: I'm married to an Italian!

_________________
Its NNYFAN, but you can just call me Kris. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
Rutledge222
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:00 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:36 am
Posts: 1486
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
Rutledge222 wrote:
Sk8haggard9 wrote:
The Republicans are self-imploding right now and I am loving every minute of it. They are calling out members of their own party deeming them "not conservative enough." Awesome job guys, split the party and spend money and time fighting your own party.

I love it.
Sorry to anyone who is republican because there are some decent ideals, but overall the party, it's christian values(which should have NO effect on government you religious fucking freaks), and their idiotic ideologies have no place in a government and society that wants to move forward.

I'm not saying the Democrats are much better, but in a party based system (which the Founding Fathers warned against) you have to pick the lesser of two evils.

I really believe that if we all just listened to the teachings and ideologies of Plato and Aristotle people would be alot more intelligent and have a much clearer perception on the world and life.


You do realize that the democrats are now fighting within their own party? haha,

And while there is the seperation of Church and State, just because someone is Christian it is going to affect a persons choices and decisions and how they live their life, cuz Christianity is a moral commitment where you define right and wrong and follow God. So if a Politicial is christian then there are bound to be decision they make which are influenced by Christianity.


Are you drunk?


Not in the least, Its no doubt that people who are Christian have their choices influenced by what they believe, in fact that goes for anyone, if you believe something you are more inclined to go for a decision that goes along with what you believe

_________________
Image
LETS GO BUFFALO!


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:11 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Never mind.

Image

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
daz28
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:43 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 3363
nnyfan wrote:
EH-hem (insert sound of cracking knuckles):

Republicans stand for:

Absolute, total equality


I guess there must be more than one kind of absolute, total equality then. If everyone is equal, then certainly we should all receive treatment when we are sick? It's just a basic of human nature to help someone who is ill. Right now there is no way that a large portion of the population who live at or below poverty can afford health insurance, but the Republicans are voting against them every day. Maybe what you mean by "equal" is that they have an equal chance of getting insurance if they can afford it, or if they haven't had a history of being ill. Obviously the only short-term solution is to subsidize, but the Republicans will cry "raise taxes" as always. No one likes higher taxes, but short of ending stupid wars created for contractors there is no other way to raise the capital necessary.

On the flip-side, it is a bit obscene to see yourself working hard to EARN something that someone else will take for granted. I guess that's a separate issue, but this country needs universal health-care NOW, and we will have to figure out the details later; a work-in-progress thing.

I hope you don't view this as a personal attack. I liked some of your points. I'm just throwing in my 2 cents is all.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:23 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
daz28 wrote:
but this country needs universal health-care NOW

Well...no one in DC, including the most left Democrats or the President want universal health care.

No bill currently on the hill has universal health care.

In fact, the $1.2 trillion bill being discussed right now only raises the level of insured from 82% to 94%.

So we pass this massive legislation and we still have millions uninsured and broke.

Good fucking job Washington.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:27 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Godzilla1960 wrote:
Image

Well I've been called ignorant before but.....

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:27 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Normally I like your posts Zilla, but that one left me scratching my head going "really?"

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
End The Curse
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:31 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 3798
Location: Boca Raton
daz28 wrote:
nnyfan wrote:
EH-hem (insert sound of cracking knuckles):

Republicans stand for:

Absolute, total equality
Maybe what you mean by "equal" is that they have an equal chance of getting insurance if they can afford it, or if they haven't had a history of being ill.

Bingo.

BTW, the GOP plan would provide a pool where those with preconditions could still receive health care benefits.

_________________
Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, when you're perfect in every way. I can't wait to look in the mirror, 'cause I get better looking each day. To know me is to love me, I must be a hell of a man. Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, but I'm doin' the best that I can.


Top
 Profile  
 
End The Curse
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:40 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 3798
Location: Boca Raton
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
Normally I like your posts Zilla, but that one left me scratching my head going "really?"

The Gilda Radner character, Emily I think, would go off on a misguided rant, misunderstanding or mishearing words and going off on a completely false tangent that was very funny. At the end, Chevy would correct her by whispering what was actually said, and she would stop, look sheepishly into the camera, and say "never mind".

Zilla is comparing the unintelligible rant of Rutlege to Emily, I'm guessing.

_________________
Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, when you're perfect in every way. I can't wait to look in the mirror, 'cause I get better looking each day. To know me is to love me, I must be a hell of a man. Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, but I'm doin' the best that I can.


Top
 Profile  
 
nnyfan
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:50 am 
Offline
Textbook Grinder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:10 am
Posts: 484
Location: 1000 Islands
Its Rosanne Rosanna Danna. I love her. LOL

Regarding Universal Health care...two things come to mind.

First, in England, the Universal care was put in place just after WW2 when England was all but obliterated by Germany. It was put in place out of necessity and everyone hates it. Now England is stuck with it because its the #1 (or so) employer in England.

Second, its not FREE. We will all be paying for it with higher taxes.

Third, if its so friggen great, why won't Congress be using it? Can you say: Double standard?

Fourth, I like my insurance the way it is from my husband's employer. If someone is poor, there is Medicaid. For children, there is Child Health Plus. I believe there should be something put in place as an OPTION for people that don't have access to health care...such as maybe their employer doesn't offer it as a perk. Maybe they are self employed. An option for these people would be nice. But making it a blanket thing, making the government in charge of it, deciding for us what we are going to have done instead of our doctor is absurd.

Okay...back to the coffee pot!

_________________
Its NNYFAN, but you can just call me Kris. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:58 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
nnyfan wrote:
Its Rosanne Rosanna Danna. I love her. LOL

Regarding Universal Health care...two things come to mind.

First, in England, the Universal care was put in place just after WW2 when England was all but obliterated by Germany. It was put in place out of necessity and everyone hates it. Now England is stuck with it because its the #1 (or so) employer in England.

Second, its not FREE. We will all be paying for it with higher taxes.

Third, if its so friggen great, why won't Congress be using it? Can you say: Double standard?

Fourth, I like my insurance the way it is from my husband's employer. If someone is poor, there is Medicaid. For children, there is Child Health Plus. I believe there should be something put in place as an OPTION for people that don't have access to health care...such as maybe their employer doesn't offer it as a perk. Maybe they are self employed. An option for these people would be nice. But making it a blanket thing, making the government in charge of it, deciding for us what we are going to have done instead of our doctor is absurd.

Okay...back to the coffee pot!


That seems mostly fair. I don't know that "the government will tell me what doctor to use" is really a valid argument though. Private providers have a list of Doctors/Dentists/whatever that they cover.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
End The Curse
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:07 am 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 3798
Location: Boca Raton
nnyfan wrote:
Its Rosanne Rosanna Danna. I love her. LOL

I loved her, too, but that was a different character of Radner's. Emily was definitely the one in the above skit. Rosanna Danna had the big, frizzy hair while Emily was more the homely librarian type.

_________________
Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, when you're perfect in every way. I can't wait to look in the mirror, 'cause I get better looking each day. To know me is to love me, I must be a hell of a man. Oh lord, it's hard to be humble, but I'm doin' the best that I can.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:42 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
I don't know that "the government will tell me what doctor to use" is really a valid argument though. Private providers have a list of Doctors/Dentists/whatever that they cover.

Sure it is.
If there's a public option, the government can't mandate that doctors participate.
Case in point: My current doctor kicks ass...he's part of a practicing group that accepts my insurance. If you're on Medicare however, you can't see my doctor...he doesn't take medicare patients.

That is, effectively, the government telling people what doctors they can and can't see.

The same situation would exist and be expanded unless the government forced doctors to accept patients on the public option.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:08 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
I saw some hope for the Republican Party in this off-year election.

In the Virginia gubernatorial election Bob McDonnell ran a positive, substantive campaign about issues that are important to the people of Virginia. As a liberal and a Democrat I have no problem losing to Republicans like McDonnell.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:00 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Crosscheck wrote:
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
I don't know that "the government will tell me what doctor to use" is really a valid argument though. Private providers have a list of Doctors/Dentists/whatever that they cover.

Sure it is.
If there's a public option, the government can't mandate that doctors participate.
Case in point: My current doctor kicks ass...he's part of a practicing group that accepts my insurance. If you're on Medicare however, you can't see my doctor...he doesn't take medicare patients.

That is, effectively, the government telling people what doctors they can and can't see.

The same situation would exist and be expanded unless the government forced doctors to accept patients on the public option.


Well, you kind of prove my point, that being that we have that problem already. I mean I guess if you want to argue that it could be compounded, I guess you might have something.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:07 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
Crosscheck wrote:
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
I don't know that "the government will tell me what doctor to use" is really a valid argument though. Private providers have a list of Doctors/Dentists/whatever that they cover.

Sure it is.
If there's a public option, the government can't mandate that doctors participate.
Case in point: My current doctor kicks ass...he's part of a practicing group that accepts my insurance. If you're on Medicare however, you can't see my doctor...he doesn't take medicare patients.

That is, effectively, the government telling people what doctors they can and can't see.

The same situation would exist and be expanded unless the government forced doctors to accept patients on the public option.


Well, you kind of prove my point, that being that we have that problem already. I mean I guess if you want to argue that it could be compounded, I guess you might have something.

How is that a problem?
I work hard to have a choice. I pay extra to have a PPO instead of a HMO plan.
If you're on a government program you have choice taken away....you get what you pay for.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:13 pm 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
Xcheck, the reason most doctors do not participate with Medicaid/Medicare is because the government barely pays shit for services. If it was comparable to commercial insurers then more doctors would participate. Yes, the health care system definitely overcharges like crazy but that is because of our lovely world of litigation. THAT is what needs to be reformed.

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:40 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
sabresindc wrote:
Xcheck, the reason most doctors do not participate with Medicaid/Medicare is because the government barely pays shit for services. If it was comparable to commercial insurers then more doctors would participate. Yes, the health care system definitely overcharges like crazy but that is because of our lovely world of litigation. THAT is what needs to be reformed.

That's covered in the bill. $4 billion of it. That was hush money for the AMA.
The bill doesn't address tort reform at all.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Sneaky E
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:50 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:14 pm
Posts: 896
Location: Williamsville
nnyfan wrote:
See, this is where I'm weird. (actually, there are many ways in which I'm weird...but anyway) I'm Episcopalian. I'm extreeeeemly proud to be and this is why. Recently, the residing Bishop passed an ordinance (I know I'm getting my verbage wrong here, but you know what I mean) making it okay for same-sex couples to be blessed in the Episcopal church. This is where my weird, yet basic and easy-to-understand religious view come into mind. I believe that God is the ultimate judge and jury of what is right and wrong in regards to the choices we make in life and how we live our lives. Its not up to us to decide, its God's job. We may not agree, but we shouldn't pass judgement. Our job, if you're a Christian, is to treat people the way Jesus would.

The people I know that are gay have been through enough! Most have had that awkward stage where they started to have feelings for the girls instead of the boys (and vice versa)...then the painful, awkward confessionals to parents and others as they dropped the bomb that they are gay...maybe even worse conversations with a spouse if they opted to ignore their feelings and hope they would go away, getting married and maybe having children. They have been through the wringer on a journey to self acceptance. Finally, they have a relationship where they feel fulfilled and complete, should they not find peace and acceptance into God's family? Should we turn them away because they choose to live differently or should we treat them the way Jesus would and accept them and their commitment to Christ, leaving God to be the judge. I couldn't in good conscience turn anyone away from church or our church family.

As my priest said one day, "We don't have to like everyone or everything they do, but we must love everyone the way Jesus would." Unless they're a Kennedy...then all bets are off!! Unless they play for the Sabres. I'm confusing myself...I need more coffee....

CV...I LOVE your avatar. I can't wait for that harry potter movie to come out!!


:clap:
:clap: :clap:
:clap: :clap: :clap:

God's job is to pass judgement, not ours. Far too often, Christians are going too far to play God and pass judgment, and exhibiting the ultimate sin of PRIDE by attempting to know the will of God. All that does is completely shy non-believers away from experiencing the love of Christ.

I don't know if this is the appropriate place for this rant, but that's not going to stop me. You see it even on these boards, all the time. Christianity is not the extremists who hold the signs saying 'God hates fags'. Christianity is not a closed-minded group who hides behind their Bibles. It is a hard, long road where you have to be extremely open minded, and open hearted, and running towards a goal bigger than what this world has to offer.

As a board member, I do take offense to the constant swindling of my religion, and my choices, because that's the same persecution that as a Christian I face in the world every day. By persecuting and mocking Jesus over and over, you can chalk that up to you constantly berating my father over and over. No one takes nicely to that, and I don't either.

We can constantly make fun of religions for being 'crazy', and 'how could they EVER believe in some unseen force that the Church has just manipulated for control over the people!? I'm so sick of them forcing their opinions on me!', or we can see the absolute ignorant error in that. I don't recall ever trying to convert an atheist, so where is your battle for conversion to your non-belief stemming from? Why do people so wholeheartedly want to bring down something that gives people a sense of peace? Do you ever wonder where that sense of peace comes from, or tried to experience it in any of your tirades? It's much easier to make an opinion rather than trying to take steps to understand the one you oppose. I was an atheist, that didn't really work out.

I'm not going to apologize, or try and gloss over what has been said.

I'm a fan of love for everyone. Republicans and democrats, straights and gays, Christians and atheists. It's because of that love, that I've been able to find a perfect glove fit in my relationship with Jesus Christ. I just wish people could stop persecuting the Church and see that they're spreading around the same closed mindedness that they're so opposed to. It has really gotten old around here.


Top
 Profile  
 
dontbethatguy
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:27 am 
Offline
Brawler
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:21 pm
Posts: 321
Personally I feel like most religions and ideologies work toward the same end. The messengers might differ but the message is often the same. I don't really feel like this is the place to go into it but that is my 2 cents.

_________________
All the things we wanted each other to be we'll never be.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron