It is currently Wed May 27, 2026 3:31 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:17 am 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
I think it'd be nice to start with some reactionary threads as the Sabres continue to slump to pinpoint some issues.

One thing I noticed that I'd like to mention:

Two out of 3 of Ottawa's non empty net goals were made possible by poor back checking plays by Pominville and Gaustad, leaving guys wide open in front of the net. :doh:

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
sabretoothpick
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:03 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 1877
Location: Graz, Austria
The outcry to play Weber over Gragnani wasn't necessary. He is equally bad in their own zone with no offensive upside. On the second goal Weber looked slow and dumb.
Based on this season McNabb should stay and Weber and Gragnani should sit when everbody is healthy.
Right now Gragnani should play instead of Weber whose +/- is awful. Gragnani isn't worse.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:40 am 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
I still think Gragnani is worse, but it's because of his star-child play decisions (passing east west instead of north south, shit like that).

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:50 am 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
sabretoothpick wrote:
The outcry to play Weber over Gragnani wasn't necessary. He is equally bad in their own zone with no offensive upside. On the second goal Weber looked slow and dumb.
Based on this season McNabb should stay and Weber and Gragnani should sit when everbody is healthy.
Right now Gragnani should play instead of Weber whose +/- is awful. Gragnani isn't worse.


Weber had one bad game. He's played great, physical hockey otherwise.

Gragnani is constantly giving the puck away. The kind of plays Weber will make for you once he gets his feet under him again are the ones similar to his raping of Phil Kessel that resulted in Vanek's breakaway goal on Friday night.

There's no room for Gragnani in the lineup when Ehrhoff, Sekera, and Leopold are already there.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:07 am 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
sabretoothpick wrote:
The outcry to play Weber over Gragnani wasn't necessary. He is equally bad in their own zone with no offensive upside. On the second goal Weber looked slow and dumb.
Based on this season McNabb should stay and Weber and Gragnani should sit when everbody is healthy.
Right now Gragnani should play instead of Weber whose +/- is awful. Gragnani isn't worse.


Weber had one bad game. He's played great, physical hockey otherwise.

Gragnani is constantly giving the puck away. The kind of plays Weber will make for you once he gets his feet under him again are the ones similar to his raping of Phil Kessel that resulted in Vanek's breakaway goal on Friday night.

There's no room for Gragnani in the lineup when Ehrhoff, Sekera, and Leopold are already there.

Exactly. Nothing against Sabretoothpick but it annoys me when people mention Grags +/-. He's been luck to be in the ice when someone scores, doesn't mean he's done anything to help with that goal.

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
union jack
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 11:04 am 
Offline
Late-Round Gem

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:13 am
Posts: 82
Location: United Kingdom
Gragnani has the best plus/minus on our team. That's a stat worth paying attention to. I would start him over Weber or Sekera any freakin' day.


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:35 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
union jack wrote:
Gragnani has the best plus/minus on our team. That's a stat worth paying attention to. I would start him over Weber or Sekera any freakin' day.


+/- is not that telling of a stat.

Gragnani is playing against teams' 3rd and 4th lines... when he doesn't, he gets smoked.

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
sabretoothpick
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:00 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 1877
Location: Graz, Austria
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
sabretoothpick wrote:
The outcry to play Weber over Gragnani wasn't necessary. He is equally bad in their own zone with no offensive upside. On the second goal Weber looked slow and dumb.
Based on this season McNabb should stay and Weber and Gragnani should sit when everbody is healthy.
Right now Gragnani should play instead of Weber whose +/- is awful. Gragnani isn't worse.


Weber had one bad game. He's played great, physical hockey otherwise.

Gragnani is constantly giving the puck away. The kind of plays Weber will make for you once he gets his feet under him again are the ones similar to his raping of Phil Kessel that resulted in Vanek's breakaway goal on Friday night.

There's no room for Gragnani in the lineup when Ehrhoff, Sekera, and Leopold are already there.


I've seen one game with Weber where he looked solid, the game he came back from his injury. All the other times I didn't like his play.
Gragnani's +/- is inflated but Weber's tells the truth. He was directly involved in a lot of goals against.

In my opinion Weber is miles away from great, physical hockey. A hit once in a while doesn't make up for blown coverages or lazy skating...Btw I'm wondering what everybody would say about raping Kessel if the refs would have called a crosscheck?

To be clear, I don't like Gragnani's game at all. I just don't feel any better with Weber on the ice.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
union jack
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:53 pm 
Offline
Late-Round Gem

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:13 am
Posts: 82
Location: United Kingdom
NYIntensity wrote:
union jack wrote:
Gragnani has the best plus/minus on our team. That's a stat worth paying attention to. I would start him over Weber or Sekera any freakin' day.


+/- is not that telling of a stat.

Gragnani is playing against teams' 3rd and 4th lines... when he doesn't, he gets smoked.


I would argue that it is quite a telling stat, seeing as Gragnani is the only player on our team to be in double digits on the plus side. No other defenseman is even a positive, except for Sekera, who is a +4.

When there is that amount of discrepancy between you and everyone else on the team, it means you must be doing something right.


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:23 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
union jack wrote:
NYIntensity wrote:
union jack wrote:
Gragnani has the best plus/minus on our team. That's a stat worth paying attention to. I would start him over Weber or Sekera any freakin' day.


+/- is not that telling of a stat.

Gragnani is playing against teams' 3rd and 4th lines... when he doesn't, he gets smoked.


I would argue that it is quite a telling stat, seeing as Gragnani is the only player on our team to be in double digits on the plus side. No other defenseman is even a positive, except for Sekera, who is a +4.

When there is that amount of discrepancy between you and everyone else on the team, it means you must be doing something right.


The team is a -9 in goal differential, so that stat makes sense. Do you WATCH Gragnani play? He LOOKS like an AHL'er.

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
union jack
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:26 pm 
Offline
Late-Round Gem

Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:13 am
Posts: 82
Location: United Kingdom
NYIntensity wrote:
union jack wrote:
NYIntensity wrote:
union jack wrote:
Gragnani has the best plus/minus on our team. That's a stat worth paying attention to. I would start him over Weber or Sekera any freakin' day.


+/- is not that telling of a stat.

Gragnani is playing against teams' 3rd and 4th lines... when he doesn't, he gets smoked.


I would argue that it is quite a telling stat, seeing as Gragnani is the only player on our team to be in double digits on the plus side. No other defenseman is even a positive, except for Sekera, who is a +4.

When there is that amount of discrepancy between you and everyone else on the team, it means you must be doing something right.


The team is a -9 in goal differential, so that stat makes sense. Do you WATCH Gragnani play? He LOOKS like an AHL'er.


Honestly, I haven't watched many games this season. So maybe I should just take your word for it. :) I just have a certain affinity towards Gragnani because he reminds me of a young up-and-coming Brian Campbell at times, and I loved Campbell.


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:28 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
sabretoothpick wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
sabretoothpick wrote:
The outcry to play Weber over Gragnani wasn't necessary. He is equally bad in their own zone with no offensive upside. On the second goal Weber looked slow and dumb.
Based on this season McNabb should stay and Weber and Gragnani should sit when everbody is healthy.
Right now Gragnani should play instead of Weber whose +/- is awful. Gragnani isn't worse.


Weber had one bad game. He's played great, physical hockey otherwise.

Gragnani is constantly giving the puck away. The kind of plays Weber will make for you once he gets his feet under him again are the ones similar to his raping of Phil Kessel that resulted in Vanek's breakaway goal on Friday night.

There's no room for Gragnani in the lineup when Ehrhoff, Sekera, and Leopold are already there.


I've seen one game with Weber where he looked solid, the game he came back from his injury. All the other times I didn't like his play.
Gragnani's +/- is inflated but Weber's tells the truth. He was directly involved in a lot of goals against.

In my opinion Weber is miles away from great, physical hockey. A hit once in a while doesn't make up for blown coverages or lazy skating...Btw I'm wondering what everybody would say about raping Kessel if the refs would have called a crosscheck?

To be clear, I don't like Gragnani's game at all. I just don't feel any better with Weber on the ice.


Weber played very good hockey when he was inserted for Grags before he got injured. It takes injured guys time to step back in and play good hockey consistently.

I'd rather let Weber work through his troubles instead of Grags. Come the playoffs (if we even make them) we'll need size on our back end, and our defense is a bunch of weak pussies when Grags is in there WITH Leopold, Sekera, and Ehrhoff.

4 offensive defensemen does not a D core make.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:49 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
union jack wrote:
NYIntensity wrote:
union jack wrote:
NYIntensity wrote:
union jack wrote:
Gragnani has the best plus/minus on our team. That's a stat worth paying attention to. I would start him over Weber or Sekera any freakin' day.


+/- is not that telling of a stat.

Gragnani is playing against teams' 3rd and 4th lines... when he doesn't, he gets smoked.


I would argue that it is quite a telling stat, seeing as Gragnani is the only player on our team to be in double digits on the plus side. No other defenseman is even a positive, except for Sekera, who is a +4.

When there is that amount of discrepancy between you and everyone else on the team, it means you must be doing something right.


The team is a -9 in goal differential, so that stat makes sense. Do you WATCH Gragnani play? He LOOKS like an AHL'er.


Honestly, I haven't watched many games this season. So maybe I should just take your word for it. :) I just have a certain affinity towards Gragnani because he reminds me of a young up-and-coming Brian Campbell at times, and I loved Campbell.


If I came off like a dick, I apologize... your love affair for him makes a little more sense now ;)

I kind of assumed that you weren't able to watch many games based on your location...he's no soupy.

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
ksquier89
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:02 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:13 pm
Posts: 1687
Location: Harford County, Maryland
Our defense allows our goal to be like a blackhole, everything funnels to that hole(pucks, opposition). They are skating in willynilly and having their way with Miller/Enroth. No taking the man, no hustle to backcheck(all busy trying to be Derek Roy on the blue line), and allow screens and entire gaggles of players to camp out front. How Miller/Enroth have not exploded on the lack of physicality on this defense upsets me. If I had dealt with this public displays of mockery would be made.


Top
 Profile  
 
daz28
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 5:21 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 3363
ksquier89 wrote:
How Miller/Enroth have not exploded on the lack of physicality on this defense upsets me. If I had dealt with this public displays of mockery would be made.

Because when Miller isn't letting in shots from outside the blue line, he's a rebound machine. Our shitty D actually bailed him out last night with the awful rebound control. It's hard for a pot to call a kettle black.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: