X-pensfan wrote:
They have to do better, and I hope they realise this. Hopefully Neidermayer will bring a voice of veteran leadership with him, and maybe even read a riot act or two.
That's not his style really. Anyway, I think people have an overly critical view of the top six. They have produced at a fair rate to their contracts compared to the rest of the league. Let me be a stat geek for a minute...
The players listed above all have a cap hit of at least 4 mil, and all scored under 70 pts. Right now there are 81 forwards that will have a cap hit of 4 mil or above next season, and only 26 of them scored over 70 pts. 55 forwards that have a cap hit over 4 mil scored less than 70 pts, so Connolly, Roy, Pominville and Vanek are in good company.
Taking it a step further, since Connolly and Roy seem to take the brunt of criticism... Only seven teams had top two centers that scored more pts than Connolly and Roy. Connolly and Roy equaled Toews and Sharp, were just behind Datsyuk and Zetterberg, and actually beat Richards and Carter.
The top six can use a physical scorer and some leadership qualities, but they are solid in point production. Dumping any of those four for leadership or physicality without replacing the talent and point production won't go very far.
That's good stuff. I'm not saying they are without hope, just that they need to produce more. I'd like to see a healthy Connolly break 80 points. Roy 80. Vanek 80. and Poms 70. I think that's well within their talents , money aside.