It is currently Sat May 30, 2026 9:32 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
1crozier1
 Post subject: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:05 am 
Offline
Late-Round Gem

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:25 pm
Posts: 51
1. If the Sabres' 4-goal outburst happened in the first instead of the second, CAR would've mounted a comeback and probably won.

I only say this because, in the third, the Sabres started exhibiting signs and symptoms of the same thing that's led to trouble in the past this year: the desire to play pretty.

This was manifested by the dumb penalties taken by Goose and Mair, Miller's awful clear that led to Sutter's goal, and by how, in general, the Sabres failed to follow Neale's advice to not worry about scoring again and just tighten down defensively.

After grinding out a win against FLA the nite before, and with the relative ease in which they chased Peters, they probably thought it was "safe" to coast again . . . but again, Miller stood up when he had to.


2. A back-to-back.

No Lalime in sight for either.

The Sabres win both.

Coincidence?

_________________
“This is a good building to play in,” Roy said. “It’s kind of quiet.”

-- forward Derek Roy, following the Sabres' 2-1 OT win over the Atlanta Thrashers on Jan. 14, 2010, a game where the home team drew just over 11,000 fans {the ninth time in 22 home games they failed to draw 12,000}


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:13 am 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
It's no surprise that when Lalime isn't in net, the Sabres have a 99% better chance of winning.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Dreakon
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:41 am 
Offline
7th Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 1:35 pm
Posts: 268
It's hard to completely get on their cases. Carolina was desperate going into the third period and after being up 4 goals in back to back winning games, I think most teams probably would've slowed down a bit. A few really dumb plays and penalties that gave Carolina some unnecessary hope, but they stuck it out and got the win.

I'm just glad we have a goalie that can win us games regularly, even when he's probably exhausted. That shit is what wins playoff games, and makes us look really good when the rest of the team actually shows up.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
jvaccaro6
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:57 am 
Offline
Certifiably Hotter than ETC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 3689
A whole lot of "If" in that post.

Honestly, are you the guy who complains about paying the taxes after winning the 250 Million dollar lottery jackpot?

FFS man, we just won, putting more distance between us and Ottawa.

Also, you try playing 2 games in less than 24 hrs, you'd die in the 3rd as well. They weren't lazy, they were dog tired. They played two back to back very physical games, against two desperate teams. Kudos to the team to get wins in back to back nights. I'm not making excuses at all, although I shouldn't have to, because there are no excuses for winning.

Facts are facts, they were beat on, they were tired, and the Canes were in total desperation mode, as a loss today pretty much eliminated them from the playoffs. They knew that, and put everything they had into the end of that game.

_________________
"She's like plan C after an 18 pack"

Squanto 7/27/2010


Top
 Profile  
 
Los9090
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:45 am 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:35 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: Glenville, NY
1crozier1 wrote:
1. If the Sabres' 4-goal outburst happened in the first instead of the second, CAR would've mounted a comeback and probably won.

I only say this because, in the third, the Sabres started exhibiting signs and symptoms of the same thing that's led to trouble in the past this year: the desire to play pretty.

This was manifested by the dumb penalties taken by Goose and Mair, Miller's awful clear that led to Sutter's goal, and by how, in general, the Sabres failed to follow Neale's advice to not worry about scoring again and just tighten down defensively.


Image

_________________
"...they came down into the stands and asked if I knew how to do play by play. I said...No. But. I'll take a shot at it if you want".- Rick Jeanneret


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:32 am 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
1crozier1 wrote:
1. If the Sabres' 4-goal outburst happened in the first instead of the second, CAR would've mounted a comeback and probably won.

I only say this because, in the third, the Sabres started exhibiting signs and symptoms of the same thing that's led to trouble in the past this year: the desire to play pretty.

This was manifested by the dumb penalties taken by Goose and Mair, Miller's awful clear that led to Sutter's goal, and by how, in general, the Sabres failed to follow Neale's advice to not worry about scoring again and just tighten down defensively.

After grinding out a win against FLA the nite before, and with the relative ease in which they chased Peters, they probably thought it was "safe" to coast again . . . but again, Miller stood up when he had to.


Image

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:49 am 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Buffalo is undefeated for the SEASON when leading after 2 periods. I think I might be willing to cut them some slack for taking their foot off the gas when leading by 4.

Looking at the two goals Carolina scored in the 3rd, the first was Miller's mistake. The second was a 6 on 4 powerplay stemming from what sounds like a pretty homer call. A 4 min penalty and misconduct FOR A CROSS CHECK? Unless he cross checked LaRose twice in the face, I don't buy it.

I don't want to be dismissive of your opinions crozier, but they pulled 7 of 10 points on this roadie, throttling the Lightning and Hurricanes in the process. That's a darn good trip IMO, and I think it's safe to say that the overall play was better than what a late goal (on a GREAT shot) would indicate.


Top
 Profile  
 
BS1970
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:28 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:19 pm
Posts: 2006
Location: Banner Elk, NC
Yeah, what everyone else is saying. They've played 3 games in 4 nights, all of which they played pretty hard in. By the 3rd they were bound to be tired, plus they already had a 4 point lead. On top of that Carolina was desperate and thought they had a chance after Miller's blunder. I'll let it slide this time just because of how they've played these past few games.

_________________
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid." ~ Han Solo

Image Image
We truly are not worthy of Miller!


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:32 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
When Jochen Hecht is dominating games night in and night out, you know this team is on a roll.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
fly as hale
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:35 pm 
Offline
Mrs. Miller
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:02 pm
Posts: 7998
Location: Orchard Park
PuckSniperPensel wrote:

Image

Poor Toby. :(

_________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Hockey Night in Buffalo


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:40 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
The Hurricanes had a lot of shots on goal. If the sabres had let in more of them (as we know, shots on goal are bad), then they could have lost 11-5. We got lucky.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:44 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
fly as hale wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:

Image

Poor Toby. :(


On the very, very rare occasion I start to feel bad for Toby rather than laugh at him, I remember that he's one of the show's writers. :D

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
fly as hale
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:45 pm 
Offline
Mrs. Miller
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:02 pm
Posts: 7998
Location: Orchard Park
This team is only good because of Miller, if he wasn't on the team we'd be a basement team.

Lindy Ruff doesn't know how to utilize (that's for you, cross) his players correctly.

My co-worker's friend saw a bunch of them at Chippewa once and they were drinking BEER and taking SHOTS. Some of them were even socializing with GIRLS. This team is full of a bunch of prima donnas who are more concerned about partying than playing hockey.

etc. etc. etc.


larry quinn for mayor

_________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Hockey Night in Buffalo


Top
 Profile  
 
ScottP
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:03 pm 
Offline
First Rounder
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:11 am
Posts: 131
Location: WNY
fly as hale wrote:
This team is only good because of Miller, if he wasn't on the team we'd be a basement team.

Lindy Ruff doesn't know how to utilize (that's for you, cross) his players correctly.

My co-worker's friend saw a bunch of them at Chippewa once and they were drinking BEER and taking SHOTS. Some of them were even socializing with GIRLS. This team is full of a bunch of prima donnas who are more concerned about partying than playing hockey.

etc. etc. etc.


larry quinn for mayor



Like


Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:16 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
Christ, and we wonder why people are leaving this place?

That should teach you not to start THREADS, with your OPINION all over the place Crozier!


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
I don't disagree that's its troubling to see us give up late goals with multi goal leads, but I guess better to do it then instead of in a tight game.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:27 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Crozier is right about giving up late goals, and we've all stated this, but we offered our counterpoints. Christ. Next time a thread pops up and there might be something we want to contest, we'll just drink the kool-aid and worship the OP.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Nuthatch
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:31 pm 
Offline
Penalty Killer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 593
I hate Koolaid.


Top
 Profile  
 
acrossthelines
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:23 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 4192
Considering what their record had been in recent games if you go back about five or six games, I am not going to complain about another win. ;)

_________________
Miles to go before I sleep

‎"Love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation."
-Khalil Gibran


Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
 Post subject: Re: Two things . . .
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:25 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
mechaphil wrote:
Crozier is right about giving up late goals, and we've all stated this, but we offered our counterpoints. Christ. Next time a thread pops up and there might be something we want to contest, we'll just drink the kool-aid and worship the OP.


Dude, i'm not saying shit about drinking cool aid, or kissing someones ass. But the tone has been rather mocking of him. And what a steak and toby from the office have to do with this I havent a clue.
Dude has 31 posts here, is he really expected to decipher everyones level of playful sarcasm?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron