SABRESAllTheWay wrote:
I know nobody wants to blame the refs. I do.
We've all listed the calls and non calls that screwed us over. The refs can't go into the playoffs with a different set of rules, and it surely looked like it. Each game can be won in different ways, whether or not they weren't physical, etc..., If vanek isn't slashed (in a non-call), if Kennedy isn't pushed off the puck (in a non-call), if Chara gets the suspension he deserved (who cares if he gets slashed, its the other game factors that led to Chara's slash-fest not Gaustad, and the NHL ignored this), etc... then we win this series.
If the Bruins are sitting there slashing away at us, and Buffalo decides to fight back then the refs penalize us.
If Buffalo shoots the puck into the zone and a forward gets pinned by the D and is held back from chasing the puck into the zone.. THATS interference. It's never called. The puck is well away from the pinning D and the rushing forward, and there's NO interference call.
The NHL has one set of rules, and the refs have their own. If the refs are held accountable (which they aren't), then this changes. In the forseeable future, there's no way a team that isn't favored by the refs will make it far into the playoffs.
There were plenty of non-calls that went against the Bruins as well. Even Jeanrette and Neale were pointing them out.
Ironically, I saw a clip of a post-game interview with Zdeno Chara from a few years ago where the interviewer pointed out a bunch of bad calls made against his team. All Chara said in response was "well, maybe so, but we have to play through them".
Complaining about the officating is as old as sports itself.
The Bruins beat the Sabres 4-2 in the regular season series and 4-2 in the post season series (and they had some key guys out who NEVER made it back). Maybe the Bruins are just better. Why doesn't that occur to some people? A win only counts if it was accomplished according to your ideea of a "proper" win? That's silly.
It's sports. Shit happens.