http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/ |
|
| 116-66 http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=478 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Sabresfansince1980 [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | 116-66 |
Not a bad SOG advantage after three games. If that keeps up pucks will go in eventually. I won't necessarily expect that advantage to keep pace, but normally they get outshot the last two years, so it's a nice change. In fairness, despite the shot advantage the other teams have had almost the same quality scoring chances. With Miller though, equal or better in that category is a win. |
|
| Author: | mechaphil [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
Goddamn. 116 shots in three games. Ridiculous. |
|
| Author: | Howie Hodge [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
Hell's Bells; Ice and I have consumed that many shots in a night between us. Might explain a lot, actually..... |
|
| Author: | End The Curse [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
We should be undefeated. Haven't lost a period yet. |
|
| Author: | CriminallyVu1gar [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
mechaphil wrote: Goddamn. 116 shots in three games. Ridiculous. Yeah, those are red wing-like numbers. I wouldn't mind us pulling up and being a bit more selective in those shots though. |
|
| Author: | PuckSniperPensel [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
Looks like a different team... |
|
| Author: | Rutledge222 [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
Different Team = Different Outcome... I hear playoffs boys! (and gals of course |
|
| Author: | Wozniak [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
im more impressed by the 66 sa. last year miller would face that in that many in a game and a half. |
|
| Author: | sabresindc [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
116-4...that's the ratio sog to goals. I know it's hard to get it in the net but that's not a good ratio...They need to find a way to get it in the net |
|
| Author: | HipKat [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
I was saying that watching the game last night, that the Sabres are FINALLY blasting pucks at the net. Unfortunately, we've played against three great goalies! |
|
| Author: | PuckSniperPensel [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 11:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
sabresindc wrote: 116-4...that's the ratio sog to goals. I know it's hard to get it in the net but that's not a good ratio...They need to find a way to get it in the net The finishing will get better as the season goes on. |
|
| Author: | icehound [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 11:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
The powerplay is abominable - Fix that, and watch the goal-totals skyrocket... |
|
| Author: | Timbo Slice [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
We look great. Eventually, the pucks will start going in, and we'll be a top 4 team in the East. |
|
| Author: | mechaphil [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
Ice is right...the powerplay woes are keeping the goal totals down. Also, with weaker goalies will be higher goals-for totals. |
|
| Author: | CriminallyVu1gar [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
HipKat wrote: I was saying that watching the game last night, that the Sabres are FINALLY blasting pucks at the net. Unfortunately, we've played against three great goalies! Jason LaBarbera is not a great goalie. Nor is Carey Price. I'd say we've played against one good goalie, one mediocre goalie and one great goalie. |
|
| Author: | mechaphil [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
Goddamned Pekka Rinne |
|
| Author: | Howie Hodge [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
While it's encouraging, it's not going to play out like this once we play some of the better teams. Still; we had a tendency to fall asleep against the weaker teams over the last two years; so this is a good sign. |
|
| Author: | MakinItLookMean [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
while that number looks encouraging, i think faceoffs might be a different story...anyone know what the faceoffs won/lost so far is ? |
|
| Author: | mechaphil [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
Our faceoffs weren't so good...I'm on it. |
|
| Author: | mechaphil [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 116-66 |
OK, fuck that noise. I cannot find compiled face-off numbers anywhere, and I am not feeling doing the work myself. Someone else wanna do it? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|