It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 6:00 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
powerplayer
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:43 am 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:01 pm
Posts: 866
First, I realize how important it is to win and get 2 points. However you get those points doesn't matter. I'm with you so far.

Second, given the rough start to the season, any win, no less a string of wins (no matter how they are achieved) is critical in building confidence. No doubt this team has had a confidence shortage very early on and snapping out of that will potentially be the difference in the season come April. Makes a lot of sense. I'm still with you.

Now here's where you may think I'm going off the reservation:

You have to ask yourself whether you just want to make it into the playoffs or whether you actually want to be a legitimate contender?

It concerns me that there is an image being created now that the Sabres are knocking off these top teams, when in reality, they are simply not getting these teams at their best. The Sabres are facing too many subs in net (11 out of 21 games now)---and don't even tell me that doesn't matter because it sure-as-shit does, especially when the PLAYOFFS roll around. Maybe it's because of opposing teams back-to-backs or maybe opposing coaches haven't been worried about the Sabres offense & PP, who knows. One thing I do know, when Miller isn't starting, you KNOW the other team ISN'T getting the real deal.

I DO NOT, repeat, DO NOT want to see this team approaching the playoffs in it's current state. My fear is that the stage WAS being set for some substantive changes after this rough start, but now things are coming up roses (thanks backups) and that's all DARCY needs to see to sit mon his hands again.

ALMOST good enough ISN'T good enough.

While the confidence building IS important, are YOU at all worried that an artificial sense of security is being built and/or needed changes will be again postponed?


Last edited by powerplayer on Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:50 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
fan4life61
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:46 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:50 pm
Posts: 1595
well, in the past we have had a record of making backups seem like vezina winners, so maybe we're turning a new leaf

_________________
Image
FIGHTER OF THE NIGHTMAN

"on the ice now for buffalo, looking for the pass, and gets it, afinogenov, couldnt get the shot away, now HE DOES, HE SCORES!!!! HOLY MACKEREL ROLE THE HIGH LIGHT FILM, MAXIM AFINOGENOV, WHAT A MOVE!!!!.... thats not fair... that was unbelievable"
-R.J. and Lorenz


Top
 Profile  
 
powerplayer
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:54 am 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:01 pm
Posts: 866
fan4life61 wrote:
well, in the past we have had a record of making backups seem like vezina winners, so maybe we're turning a new leaf


Interesting point.

I was really looking forward to seeing Miller face down Quick. Instead they throw a guy with a losing record in net.

Great win, but not as great a test.

Darcy does not need excuses to do nothing, and now he's getting them.


Top
 Profile  
 
Triplez47888
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:57 am 
Offline
Late-Round Gem
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:53 pm
Posts: 66
Location: West Seneca, NY
I totally agree with this post. This team is still not capable of competing in the playoffs like it was last year. They are still missing key pieces to being a legitimate contender and all this winning against back ups will give Darcy even more reason to preach that they are coming around, when we still know that a lot of work and some changes do indeed need to be done


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:09 am 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
So hanging with Washington the previous game wasn't a test? And Vancouver either, even when they played a backup? Holtby for Washington has been pretty good also for them so it's not like they were facing anyone weak. And Biron, come on, you're going to tell me he still couldn't be a legit starter in this league, plus he's always played us tough.

I didn't watch last night's game, but LA is a powerhouse of a team and we soundly beat them. I hate these what if cards because our team is playing good hockey right now. It can always use fixes, but 2 points is 2 points and we need to right the ship and get over .500 is all, against backups or not, the team has won 5 of it's last 7. Compared to our terrible start.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 6:19 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
I don't think its a big deal. A lot of the so-called backups aren't that much different from their starter skillwise (Leclaire/Elliot, Mason/Pavelec). Also some of the backups we've played actually have better stats than the starter (Thomas, Schneider) so we've actually seen the better guy in those instances.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
ooodjaceooo
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:38 am 
Offline
Emergency Call-Up
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:21 pm
Posts: 233
Location: Jamestown, NY
I AGREE!...quit bitching, we are doing much better, sure they still have work to do, but they beat L.A soundly, and all of the goals were a result of hard work, no weak goals, especially that laser by hecht

_________________
Buffalo born, Buffalo Bred, Ill love my hockey, till im Buffalo dead!


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 11:03 am 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Why does this topic keep coming back up?

Yes, they've played against a string of backups. However, aside from Vancouver, they've haven't won because of cupcake goals. Their overall level of play has improved.

To address the second doom and gloom point, do I think they're a contender right now? Not really. They might be good enough to recover from their suck ass start and make the playoffs, and once you're there anything can happen.

I don't understand the desire for a team to 'be a contender' on November. The Sabres kicked the league's ass after the lockout, and got unlucky in the playoffs. Last year, the Canadians and Flyers finished 7th and 8th on the last day of the season, and made it to the conference finals.

Championships are won in the spring, not the fall.


Top
 Profile  
 
powerplayer
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 11:08 am 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:01 pm
Posts: 866
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
So hanging with Washington the previous game wasn't a test? And Vancouver either, even when they played a backup? Holtby for Washington has been pretty good also for them so it's not like they were facing anyone weak. And Biron, come on, you're going to tell me he still couldn't be a legit starter in this league, plus he's always played us tough.

I didn't watch last night's game, but LA is a powerhouse of a team and we soundly beat them. I hate these what if cards because our team is playing good hockey right now. It can always use fixes, but 2 points is 2 points and we need to right the ship and get over .500 is all, against backups or not, the team has won 5 of it's last 7. Compared to our terrible start.


As I said, it's important for the team's psyche to get wins. I know.

Still, they keep facing backups and IMHO aren't really being tested. Darcy was being put in a situation where he HAd to act sooner or later. That's going up in smoke now.

If you're happy with another ho-hum mediocre one-and-done-playoff-round kinda season, then ok.


Top
 Profile  
 
powerplayer
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 11:13 am 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:01 pm
Posts: 866
Squanto wrote:
Why does this topic keep coming back up?

Yes, they've played against a string of backups. However, aside from Vancouver, they've haven't won because of cupcake goals. Their overall level of play has improved.

To address the second doom and gloom point, do I think they're a contender right now? Not really. They might be good enough to recover from their suck ass start and make the playoffs, and once you're there anything can happen.

I don't understand the desire for a team to 'be a contender' on November. The Sabres kicked the league's ass after the lockout, and got unlucky in the playoffs. Last year, the Canadians and Flyers finished 7th and 8th on the last day of the season, and made it to the conference finals.

Championships are won in the spring, not the fall.



It's NOT doom & gloom to say they will probably get into the playoffs, but not last very long. It's not that at all. It's just reality.

Do you want a legit contender, or just a team that can land in the playoffs? And I know the whole, "gee, if you just get in--anything can happen" routine. I'd prefer to stack the deck than hope and cross my fingers---which seems to be Darcy's approach year after year.


Top
 Profile  
 
gr8daygo
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 11:39 am 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 2265
yes timmy still needs to be moved.... and yes i dont want staff back in ...or if he is in, i want him no where near the top 6... i like this team with out staff.... and timmy has been screwing the pooch all year... and i like timmy, but come on man.....

_________________
Belief - Commitment - Character - Discipline - Trust

E X C E L L E N C E


Top
 Profile  
 
sabres1996
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:07 pm 
Offline
Face-Off Specialist
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 2:38 pm
Posts: 723
Location: West Seneca, New York
How come every topic you start, it's always you bitching or it's negative? come on man, we're doing good right now, don't put me in a bad mood.

_________________
Sophomore Bitches! Class of 2014!
R.I.P. Molly B. 5/28/96-5/23/11
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:15 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
powerplayer wrote:
Still, they keep facing backups and IMHO aren't really being tested.

On what do you base that opinion?

IMO maybe 1 of those games was won on soft goals, the rest were legitimate wins.

What goals went in last night that Quick would have definitely stopped???

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:22 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
Squanto wrote:
Championships are won in the spring, not the fall.


but they can be lost in the fall. gotta string some wins together, which thankfully, theyve begun doing.

and why are some things such a taboo to discuss? someone makes a thread, and then everyones all, "WHY IS THIS A THREAD? WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THIS?!" because its a message board and thats what they are for.

_________________
Image


Last edited by ironyisadeadscene on Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:23 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
sabres1996 wrote:
How come every topic you start, it's always you bitching or it's negative?



Seriously.

And what the fuck is the point of this thread, it's not like the team is making some choice to face backup goalies, or that they will face backups throughout the season, what are you even proposing? This thread has zero purpose.


Top
 Profile  
 
powerplayer
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:45 pm 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:01 pm
Posts: 866
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
sabres1996 wrote:
How come every topic you start, it's always you bitching or it's negative?



Seriously.

And what the fuck is the point of this thread, it's not like the team is making some choice to face backup goalies, or that they will face backups throughout the season, what are you even proposing? This thread has zero purpose.


Someitmes it's IMPOSSIBLE to have a grown-up discussion on this board.

I have had interesting discussions with some people about this very topic in person, yet nobody I talked to poo-pooed the concept that this team has had an easier versoion of these so-called top teams and division leaders. Geez, how can you guys not see that?

Here's an experiment: Let's put Lalime in and see how the team does! What's that? You don't think they'll do as well? Why not, goalies are interchangeable. If the fucking Islanders beat the Sabres with Lalime in net, that's still a victory over the Sabres, right? Yay! The Isles can skate with and beat the Sabres now! Yup.

Exercize some critical thoguht and stop attacking the messenger.

And for anybody who thinks thigns are peachy because April is sooooo far away, you need to recognize that playoff or cup contention is BUILT throughout the season, not in April.


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:46 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
but they can be lost in the fall. gotta string some wins together, which thankfully, theyve begun doing.

and why are some things such a taboo to discuss? someone makes a thread, and then everyones all, "WHY IS THIS A THREAD? WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THIS?!" because its a message board and thats what they are for.


Yeah, I'm quite aware of that.

My point is that writing off a team in November as having zero chance at a championship run is silly. As poorly as they started, they're currently tied for 8th place in the conference. They have been able to turn it around and not play themselves out of contention.

And this subject is not taboo. It's just been beaten to death over the last few weeks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:48 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
We haven't peaked.

This team can play even better hockey. Pominville and Connolly finally got themselves on the board last night.

The D is still coming together game by game.

I see the backup situation as an opportunity to build some confidence and start playing better hockey.

So far, so good.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:50 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
powerplayer wrote:
Exercize some critical thoguht and stop attacking the messenger.


People are exercising 'critical thought'. They just don't agree with you.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:50 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
Squanto wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
but they can be lost in the fall. gotta string some wins together, which thankfully, theyve begun doing.

and why are some things such a taboo to discuss? someone makes a thread, and then everyones all, "WHY IS THIS A THREAD? WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THIS?!" because its a message board and thats what they are for.


Yeah, I'm quite aware of that.

My point is that writing off a team in November as having zero chance at a championship run is silly. As poorly as they started, they're currently tied for 8th place in the conference. They have been able to turn it around and not play themselves out of contention.

And this subject is not taboo. It's just been beaten to death over the last few weeks.


they havnt played themselves out of contention no. almost, but they are back in. the devils were talking about the golden 20/20 rule. 20 points by the 20 game mark. and how few teams who have failed to get 20 points by 20 games have made the playoffs in the history of the league. its happened, but its rare.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron