http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/ |
|
| connolly wont be moved? http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5686 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | ironyisadeadscene [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | connolly wont be moved? |
http://blogs.buffalonews.com/sabres/201 ... es+Edge%29 |
|
| Author: | Squanto [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
It's also been reported that the Sabres are listening to offers, and haven't decided on him yet. Best to wait until 3pm to see. |
|
| Author: | ironyisadeadscene [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
i find it odd the word "untouchable" was used though. |
|
| Author: | Ryan911T [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
Squanto wrote: Best to wait until 3pm to see. It's so far away!!! |
|
| Author: | Squanto [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
ironyisadeadscene wrote: i find it odd the word "untouchable" was used though. Could very well be creative license from the reporter. LeBrun has said the Sabres are listening. |
|
| Author: | Sabresfansince1980 [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
ironyisadeadscene wrote: i find it odd the word "untouchable" was used though. That's what TBN does, use dramatic words, maybe try to put them in Regier's mouth, in order to express their "expert" opinions and criticize him. Can't wait for fat ass Bucky Treason to chime in later. |
|
| Author: | mechaphil [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
I trust Pierre LeBrun's report that he isn't in play RIGHT NOW. |
|
| Author: | PuckSniperPensel [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
Lebrun is pretty reliable with Sabres information. |
|
| Author: | Displaced Fan [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
Meh...fuck, Quinn said the team wasn't being sold. I believe nothing. |
|
| Author: | Sabretooth [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 1:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
If Connolly was showing up each game, scoring, and playing like a legititmate first line center, he would not be touchable. Knowing things for him have been reverse this season and we do not intend to keep him after the season, we have over two hours remaining to ship his ass out. Anyone who says Connolly is untouchable is not the best pro-Sabres source. |
|
| Author: | Sabresfansince1980 [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
Goofy, it was John Vogl of TBN using that term. Obviously they are trolling as usual. |
|
| Author: | Sabretooth [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
Vogl lost his credibility for the day. Screw him. |
|
| Author: | Squanto [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
Sabretooth wrote: Vogl lost his credibility for the day. Screw him. Cmon, Vogl is the BEST BEAT REPORTER IN THE HISTORY OF SPORTS according to his editor. |
|
| Author: | SabresKings5711 [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
Displaced Fan wrote: Meh...fuck, Quinn said the team wasn't being sold. I believe nothing. This. I agree, Connolly should be gone by 3pm... I hope. |
|
| Author: | fly as hale [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
ironyisadeadscene wrote: i find it odd the word "untouchable" was used though. That's The Buffalo News's use of the word, not the Sabres. Squanto wrote: Cmon, Vogl is the BEST BEAT REPORTER IN THE HISTORY OF SPORTS according to his editor. I thought it was lame that they did that special report on him all because of what Miller said. It's not that I don't respect what sports reporters do to get information to fans, I know they work hard, but it was obvious that they were way too sensitive about Miller's remarks so they had to give readers a detailed play-by-play description into what goes into their work day. |
|
| Author: | Sabretooth [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
Squanto wrote: Sabretooth wrote: Vogl lost his credibility for the day. Screw him. Cmon, Vogl is the BEST BEAT REPORTER IN THE HISTORY OF SPORTS according to his editor. What does that make Bucky Gleason, the next Edward Morrow? |
|
| Author: | Sabretooth [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
fly as hale wrote: ironyisadeadscene wrote: i find it odd the word "untouchable" was used though. That's The Buffalo News's use of the word, not the Sabres. The Buffalo News is really leftist today. |
|
| Author: | X-pensfan [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
Sabretooth wrote: If Connolly was showing up each game, scoring, and playing like a legititmate first line center, he would not be touchable. Knowing things for him have been reverse this season and we do not intend to keep him after the season, we have over two hours remaining to ship his ass out. Anyone who says Connolly is untouchable is not the best pro-Sabres source. It's not a horrible idea to keep him and see if he can muster some playoff pride and up his UFA value significantly, with a strong showing. That would be in his best interest but I don't know if he has that club in his bag. Still, if the offers are weak, keeping could be the best thing for the club in the short term. |
|
| Author: | Sabretooth [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
If Darcy Regier fails to acquire a center, I guess we are stuck with Connolly. Regier just gets a castration this evening. |
|
| Author: | YankeeInRaleigh [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 2:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: connolly wont be moved? |
ironyisadeadscene wrote: i find it odd the word "untouchable" was used though. Really? It seems the perfect word to me...I mean, what fucking team would want to touch him anyways? |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|