http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/

SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO
http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6607
Page 1 of 1

Author:  ooodjaceooo [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:57 am ]
Post subject:  SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

Sorry but this really pissed me off

http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Peter-Te ... /161/39566

Author:  sabresindc [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

fuck him.....fan homer. I agree that Roy is probably our most well known diver but most calls, either way, were deserved.

Author:  SABRESAllTheWay [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

There was like what, one tripping call? Kane was holding to every Sabres last night.

Were they watching the same game I was?

Author:  PuckSniperPensel [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 9:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

https://twitter.com/#!/Teddier

Let him have it. That's what I'm doing.

Author:  PatGreen [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 9:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

harassment fixes everything!!!!

Author:  YankeeInRaleigh [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

meh, I thought roy definitely embellished on that last penalty.

Author:  hockeyplaya00 [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

Heres how I went about reading that article, Ill start with the URL

www. "a website!"

hockey..."A hockey website! Maybe a good source of articles and such!"

buzz... ".......Im not even going to open it..."

Author:  fly as hale [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

I'm more offended by the horrible writing than the content itself. Amateur. Do these people actually get paid to write for Hockey Buzz? Christ.

Author:  ironyisadeadscene [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

PatGreen wrote:
harassment fixes everything!!!!


all i can think of right now is what would sterling archer do?

Author:  PatGreen [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

ironyisadeadscene wrote:
all i can think of right now is what would sterling archer do?

nothing but win

Author:  ironyisadeadscene [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

PatGreen wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
all i can think of right now is what would sterling archer do?

nothing but win


ill put these donuts on the floor, and you can eat them like a hungry hungry hippo.

Author:  sabresrocker56 [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

The clearly fabricated quotes pretty much disqualify this piece right off the bat. Unless his readers really believe he just chills with the 'Nucks at the bar regularly. This is the downside of the internet. Give someone the ability to write "stories" and they think they can write whatever they want be considered a journalist. What a bum. Even the title is terrible. Does anybody at least bother to edit these blogs over at HB. (Dumb question, sorry).

Author:  sabresEH [ Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

As if the Canucks are a team that is allowed to complain about diving. The league said they would start calling more diving penalties this year because of how they played in the playoffs. Most calls were justified last night. Refs definitely determined the outcome of the game.

Author:  patkane88 [ Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

I still can't believe roy was never called for diving that lead to that 5-on-3 last night.

Author:  BlueandYellow [ Thu Nov 10, 2011 4:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

Wah they took penalties waaahhhh get the fuck over it. They were all deserved except maybe Roy's, and I didn't see a penalty for slashing VANEK'S STICK out of his hands.

Author:  useful fictions [ Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: SABRES DIVERS?...UHH NO

fly as hale wrote:
I'm more offended by the horrible writing than the content itself. Amateur. Do these people actually get paid to write for Hockey Buzz? Christ.


i completely agree. the writer can't differentiate adverbs and pronouns, apparently. i think a lesson in the use of commas, or the consideration of a semi-colon where it's needed, would also help.

not only should the author's ability to keep such company be put in question, but his ability to perceive the intent of the reactions and comments of those around him should be brought up. if this person can't clearly communicate, then how are we supposed to believe that he (it?) understands what is being communicated to him?

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/