Jim Bob wrote:
Why can't they use 3 roster spots on goalies?
Are you being sarcastic? If so, I applaud you! If not, you are grossly misunderstanding the reality of how an NHL roster works. Let me explain.
A max of 23 total players are allowed on an NHL roster. Period. If someone is injured they can be placed on IR and a new spot is made available. Because of this, there are no teams in the NHL that can afford to carry 3 goalies on the active roster, as position players cannot be sacrificed for 3rd string netminders - particularly when they command trade value on the open market.
Now, the Islanders in particular are really struggling at defense right now. They need an upgrade at that position if they are to contend for the playoffs. The idea that they will sacrifice an opportunity to upgrade that critical position because they would prefer to make sure they are 3 deep in goal is simply not a smart calculation. They need help at D now, they have a commodity they can move, and if they hope to get anything in return before it's too late they will move him ASAP.
Now, the Sabres have a surplus of defensemen. Two of them are going to be UFA's at the end of the year, Tallinder and Lydman, and both will not be resigned in the offseason. The Sabres also have a very serious need for a quality backup goalie, with Lalime sporting a groin injury, coming off double hip and hernia surgery in the off season, and carrying terrible statistics when he has played, and only a very young rookie as the other option, it would be both in the best interests of the Sabres as well as the Islanders to make this deal before the Olympic break.