http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/ |
|
| Our 1st + Gerbe http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2838 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | sabresEH [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Our 1st + Gerbe |
I was just wondering what you guys think we could get for this package. What I was more wondering though is if this package could be enough to trade up at the draft and select Brett Connolly or Neiderreiter. |
|
| Author: | ironyisadeadscene [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
ennis makes gerbe expendable, and id LOVE to see gerbe moved, because hes at best, a 50 pt a season guy. thats not bad, per say, but they can use that roster spot for a more well rounded player. so what could they get for him? im not sure. |
|
| Author: | BlueandYellow [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
Ennis is way better than Gerbe. Gerbe hogs the puck and tries to be pretty, like Tim Connolly, but worse... Ennis at least passes it and has way more skill. |
|
| Author: | Timbo Slice [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
Yeah, I like Gerbe, but I'd kind of like to see him moved while his stock is high. |
|
| Author: | psychemedisabrefan [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
i'd say throw that waste of space perrson in the mix as well. the guy is useless. however the third player may be appealing to some team. |
|
| Author: | HelloMyKneeGrows [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
I think Gerbe and a 1st, if someone is willing, should at least get us in the 10-12 range but probably not a lot higher |
|
| Author: | Rud [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
We could totally trade TJ Brennan straight up for the first overall pick. |
|
| Author: | HelloMyKneeGrows [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
Rud wrote: We could totally trade TJ Brennan straight up for the first overall pick. I'm assuming this is humor? |
|
| Author: | mechaphil [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
HelloMyKneeGrows wrote: Rud wrote: We could totally trade TJ Brennan straight up for the first overall pick. I'm assuming this is humor? Only the driest. |
|
| Author: | BlueandYellow [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
Let's trade Gerbe for Pavel Datsyuk. |
|
| Author: | Dreakon [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
Finally, something reasonable! |
|
| Author: | Van_Da_Man [ Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
mechaphil wrote: HelloMyKneeGrows wrote: Rud wrote: We could totally trade TJ Brennan straight up for the first overall pick. I'm assuming this is humor? Only the driest. LOL @ Edmonton. |
|
| Author: | Jim Bob [ Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
Given that Gerbe is relatively unproven at the NHL level, I doubt he has a boatload of trade value today. As sad as it may sound, a guy like Stafford might get the Sabres further up in the 1st round than Gerbe would. |
|
| Author: | PuckSniperPensel [ Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
Gerbe is going to be a very good NHL player. You guys need to start getting selfish. I want to keep both him and Ennis. |
|
| Author: | HelloMyKneeGrows [ Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
PuckSniperPensel wrote: Gerbe is going to be a very good NHL player. You guys need to start getting selfish. I want to keep both him and Ennis. We've have enough flashy midgets who are incapable of hitting or doing the dirty work necessary to score goals most nights. One more I can handle (Ennis), but two more is one too many and I think Gerbe becomes the odd man out. |
|
| Author: | PuckSniperPensel [ Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
HelloMyKneeGrows wrote: PuckSniperPensel wrote: Gerbe is going to be a very good NHL player. You guys need to start getting selfish. I want to keep both him and Ennis. We've have enough flashy midgets who are incapable of hitting or doing the dirty work necessary to score goals most nights. One more I can handle (Ennis), but two more is one too many and I think Gerbe becomes the odd man out. Not in the future. Gerbe and Ennis are going to be our two flashy midgets, flanked by guys like Zach Kassian, Tim Kennedy, Luke Adam, and others. |
|
| Author: | sabresEH [ Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
Jim Bob wrote: Given that Gerbe is relatively unproven at the NHL level, I doubt he has a boatload of trade value today. As sad as it may sound, a guy like Stafford might get the Sabres further up in the 1st round than Gerbe would. Yeah he would need to be showcased a bit more before trading. Usually when you look to move up some later draft picks are involved but I wouldn't mind keeping all 3 3rd's we have this year. |
|
| Author: | sabresEH [ Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
PuckSniperPensel wrote: HelloMyKneeGrows wrote: PuckSniperPensel wrote: Gerbe is going to be a very good NHL player. You guys need to start getting selfish. I want to keep both him and Ennis. We've have enough flashy midgets who are incapable of hitting or doing the dirty work necessary to score goals most nights. One more I can handle (Ennis), but two more is one too many and I think Gerbe becomes the odd man out. Not in the future. Gerbe and Ennis are going to be our two flashy midgets, flanked by guys like Zach Kassian, Tim Kennedy, Luke Adam, and others. If we could draft Brett Connolly he and Ennis would just rip it up together. It would be worth trading Gerbe for imo. |
|
| Author: | ironyisadeadscene [ Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
luke adam is good in the Q, but i have a hunch hes not going to be a big impact player in the NHL. could be wrong, |
|
| Author: | mechaphil [ Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Our 1st + Gerbe |
ironyisadeadscene wrote: luke adam is good in the Q, but i have a hunch hes not going to be a big impact player in the NHL. could be wrong, I'm 50/50 on him, but I'm gonna enjoy seeing what he can do in the AHL next season. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|