http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/ |
|
| Please No Ales Hemsky http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=6804 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | SabresBillsFan [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Please No Ales Hemsky |
I know his name is being thrown around for awhile now and I hope the sabres aren't interested in acquiring him. This team doesn't need another underachiever and a player who isn't motivate to show up every game. |
|
| Author: | ksquier89 [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
Any player with the first name Ales....caugh Kots caugh |
|
| Author: | Howie Hodge [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
Absolutely agree with you both here. Hemsky is a soft, injury prone (probably low pain threshold) player. Very talented; but we've seen those here before, and we ended up all hating Satan. Last night he held up on winning a race that would have prevented icing against The Oilers, in fear he'd get hit. Literally backed off. Game was 4 - 3 Oilers, with 22 seconds left. Result was a faceoff in Edmonton's end; whereas his getting to the puck would have kept play going in a Chicago end, and Crawford out of the net. Luckily Chicago was unable to tie it. Wimp. |
|
| Author: | BlueandYellow [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
Ales Hemsky isn't lazy. I hate that the term lazy is thrown around so meaninglessly, just to add on to someone's point even when it's false. Ales Hemsky is injury prone, but extremely talented and he's NOT lazy. |
|
| Author: | Howie Hodge [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
The word "lazy" doesn't appear in any posts until the last one prior to this one. |
|
| Author: | BlueandYellow [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
Howie Hodge wrote: The word "lazy" doesn't appear in any posts until the last one prior to this one. I know the literal term lazy didn't show up, but saying he isn't motivated is essentially the same thing. |
|
| Author: | Howie Hodge [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
Apology accepted. |
|
| Author: | BlueandYellow [ Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
BlueandYellow wrote: Ales Hemsky isn't lazy. I hate that the term lazy is thrown around so meaninglessly, just to add on to someone's point even when it's false. Ales Hemsky is injury prone, but extremely talented and he's NOT lazy. By the way, I wasn't directing this specifically at any of you, but just in general. |
|
| Author: | patkane88 [ Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
Hemsky would fit in so well with all the under achieving crap forwards this team has |
|
| Author: | OilOnWhyte [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
SabresBillsFan wrote: I know his name is being thrown around for awhile now and I hope the sabres aren't interested in acquiring him. This team doesn't need another underachiever and a player who isn't motivate to show up every game. Joined to respond to this post. Not sure why Hemsky gets this label. The guy is a near point per game player (he's averaged .92 points per game since the lockout). He's injured a lot more than I'd like him to be, but I'd rather see the Oilers sign him for a three or four year deal. He's easily been the best forward on the team when healthy since the Cup run of '06. From where does he get the label of 'underachiever'? |
|
| Author: | BlueandYellow [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
OilOnWhyte wrote: SabresBillsFan wrote: I know his name is being thrown around for awhile now and I hope the sabres aren't interested in acquiring him. This team doesn't need another underachiever and a player who isn't motivate to show up every game. Joined to respond to this post. Not sure why Hemsky gets this label. The guy is a near point per game player (he's averaged .92 points per game since the lockout). He's injured a lot more than I'd like him to be, but I'd rather see the Oilers sign him for a three or four year deal. He's easily been the best forward on the team when healthy since the Cup run of '06. From where does he get the label of 'underachiever'? Welcome to our boards, by the way. This is what I wanted to say. I've seen Hemsky play. His main problem is injuries, but he tries and has talent. I'd want him on the Sabres for sure. |
|
| Author: | OilOnWhyte [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
BlueandYellow wrote: OilOnWhyte wrote: SabresBillsFan wrote: I know his name is being thrown around for awhile now and I hope the sabres aren't interested in acquiring him. This team doesn't need another underachiever and a player who isn't motivate to show up every game. Joined to respond to this post. Not sure why Hemsky gets this label. The guy is a near point per game player (he's averaged .92 points per game since the lockout). He's injured a lot more than I'd like him to be, but I'd rather see the Oilers sign him for a three or four year deal. He's easily been the best forward on the team when healthy since the Cup run of '06. From where does he get the label of 'underachiever'? Welcome to our boards, by the way. This is what I wanted to say. I've seen Hemsky play. His main problem is injuries, but he tries and has talent. I'd want him on the Sabres for sure. Thank you! I've maintained that if you'd like to trade him because he's injury prone, I can't really argue that. TC was a guy you had that was injury prone, but when he played, he wasn't too awful bad. Same with Hemsky. When he plays, he'll have the two assists in a 4-2 loss. I've got plenty of examples from the past five years should illustration ever become necessary. The complete utter lack of NHL-calibre defence is what's keeping the Oilers away from being near the playoffs. It's not Hemsky, that's for sure. |
|
| Author: | ironyisadeadscene [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
i like hemsky. but, look. if you wanna keep hemsky, can we have RNH? please? the oilers are going to be a super team real fast. |
|
| Author: | OilOnWhyte [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
ironyisadeadscene wrote: i like hemsky. but, look. if you wanna keep hemsky, can we have RNH? please? the oilers are going to be a super team real fast. The Oilers will continue to struggle until the defence is fixed. This will be the sixth consecutive year out of the playoffs. The natives are restless. With that being said, I'm pretty sure Edmonton would take Ales Kotalik off your hands...again. |
|
| Author: | BlueandYellow [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
OilOnWhyte wrote: BlueandYellow wrote: OilOnWhyte wrote: SabresBillsFan wrote: I know his name is being thrown around for awhile now and I hope the sabres aren't interested in acquiring him. This team doesn't need another underachiever and a player who isn't motivate to show up every game. Joined to respond to this post. Not sure why Hemsky gets this label. The guy is a near point per game player (he's averaged .92 points per game since the lockout). He's injured a lot more than I'd like him to be, but I'd rather see the Oilers sign him for a three or four year deal. He's easily been the best forward on the team when healthy since the Cup run of '06. From where does he get the label of 'underachiever'? Welcome to our boards, by the way. This is what I wanted to say. I've seen Hemsky play. His main problem is injuries, but he tries and has talent. I'd want him on the Sabres for sure. Thank you! I've maintained that if you'd like to trade him because he's injury prone, I can't really argue that. TC was a guy you had that was injury prone, but when he played, he wasn't too awful bad. Same with Hemsky. When he plays, he'll have the two assists in a 4-2 loss. I've got plenty of examples from the past five years should illustration ever become necessary. The complete utter lack of NHL-calibre defence is what's keeping the Oilers away from being near the playoffs. It's not Hemsky, that's for sure. I actually was hoping Edmonton would take Larsson. RNH is a great player, but an Oiler team with Larsson on it would've been disgusting. |
|
| Author: | ironyisadeadscene [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
OilOnWhyte wrote: ironyisadeadscene wrote: i like hemsky. but, look. if you wanna keep hemsky, can we have RNH? please? the oilers are going to be a super team real fast. The Oilers will continue to struggle until the defence is fixed. This will be the sixth consecutive year out of the playoffs. The natives are restless. With that being said, I'm pretty sure Edmonton would take Ales Kotalik off your hands...again. you guys can have grags. for like.. a 3rd round pick. |
|
| Author: | OilOnWhyte [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
BlueandYellow wrote: I actually was hoping Edmonton would take Larsson. RNH is a great player, but an Oiler team with Larsson on it would've been disgusting. I absolutely was pulling for Larsson. Looking back, RNH is a pretty nice consolation prize. |
|
| Author: | OilOnWhyte [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
ironyisadeadscene wrote: you guys can have grags. for like.. a 3rd round pick. Gragnani leads your team in +/-, and the Sabres are under .500? Third round pick? Done. Done yesterday. |
|
| Author: | Jammerz04 [ Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
Hemsky would be a great addition to the Sabres. But the only thing we desperately need on this team is a star center.... |
|
| Author: | Los9090 [ Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Please No Ales Hemsky |
Yup, we're good on the wing |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|