It is currently Fri May 29, 2026 11:04 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:57 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO


Matt Cookie is scum. The impact on Savard occurs only at his head and neck. And no penalty was called.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Rud
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:49 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 4121
Location: Hamburg
This is absolutely inexcusable. Seeing shades of the Richards on Booth hit, here.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresrocker56
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 880
This is an absolutely gutless play by Cooke. He is garbage and he will always be garbage. There is absolutely no reason for him to take a run at Savard's head well after he released that puck. This really could have injured Savard, and he'll probably be out for a long time. There is no reason to make that hit and Cooke knows it. This is a complete lack of respect for another player. Cooke needs to be gone for a long long time. Richards too should have been suspended, because he is also a dirt bag, but he does it more subtly and gets away with it because he is considered "Selke-worthy." The only thing Mike Richards is worthy of is suspensions. Both this and the hit on Booth are gutless and unnecessary plays that do not belong in the game. If Cooke gets less than 10 games, it'll be an absolute mockery.

_________________
Rest in Peace Nani. 10/3/10

Gerbacity

NYIntensity wrote:
Sabres2Sabres wrote:
If Miller and Myers were playing like they did last year, we'd probably be over 500 right now.

If I had decided to jerk off instead, I probably wouldn't be paying child support...


"Grier coming in over the line. He leaves it to Gaustad. The shot. THEY SCOOOREE!! RING UP ANOTHER ONE FOR THE GOOSE!!! HONK IF YA HEAR THE GOOSE!! 3-0 BUFFALO!"


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:12 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
In before 'he was admiring his pass' comments.

Disgusting, gutless move. It seems like there have been so many more this season as compared to the last couple. The league MUST do something about this before someone gets paralyzed.


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:13 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
I don't think a penalty should've been called. It's all the equipment's fault imo. Guys can't be expected to be held accountable for the way they play.

:roll:

sarcasm/wanted to be the first to make that dumb comment

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:15 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
What really disgusted me is the slow-motion toward the end of the clip. You see just how late Cooke was in hitting Savard, and how far up on Savard's head his hit was. Wretched.

I don't want to see one comment about the gear players are wearing these days, because gear doesn't tell you to drill another player in the head intentionally. If that's your argument, you need to be checked for schizophrenia, because you can't discern reality from fantasy.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:17 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
someone took reggie dunlops "let em know your there" speech too seriously.

what a gutless play. i dont approve.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
psychemedisabrefan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:25 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 2138
Location: Pendleton, NY
shoulder to the neck, savard had just shot the puck. i think cooke had started the check before the shot but still shoulder to neck doesn't equal fun. just put a ban on head shots.

_________________
"Tis The Season, Fa la la la la LaFontaine" - Rick Jeanneret


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:05 am 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/nhl/ne ... id=4974051

Cooke has the audacity to thing that was shoulder to shoulder? Yeah, that's why you lifted your elbow up scumbag.

Quote:
"I felt like it was shoulder to shoulder," said Cooke, who is uncertain whether he will be suspended by the NHL. "I know he's shooting the puck but I just finished my check. I got hit the same way my shift before at center ice by their defenseman, except I [ducked] at the last second."


Also, Savard has a confirmed concussion, and was taken off the ice on a stretcher.

If the over/under on this is 10 games, I'm praying for the over. I'm sure he gets 5 or less though.


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:59 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Squanto wrote:
http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/nhl/news/story?id=4974051

Cooke has the audacity to thing that was shoulder to shoulder? Yeah, that's why you lifted your elbow up scumbag.

Quote:
"I felt like it was shoulder to shoulder," said Cooke, who is uncertain whether he will be suspended by the NHL. "I know he's shooting the puck but I just finished my check. I got hit the same way my shift before at center ice by their defenseman, except I [ducked] at the last second."


Also, Savard has a confirmed concussion, and was taken off the ice on a stretcher.

If the over/under on this is 10 games, I'm praying for the over. I'm sure he gets 5 or less though.


It baffles me that NHL owners don't want to put a mandatory penalty in place for blows to the head.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:28 am 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
THAT is the blindside hit I'm talking about.

That could be penalized just like boarding. Open ice hits should be from the front only, so players have a fighting chance at defending themselves.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Los9090
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:46 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:35 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: Glenville, NY
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
THAT is the blindside hit I'm talking about.

That could be penalized just like boarding. Open ice hits should be from the front only, so players have a fighting chance at defending themselves.

Good point there. Can't believe there was no call. :evil:

_________________
"...they came down into the stands and asked if I knew how to do play by play. I said...No. But. I'll take a shot at it if you want".- Rick Jeanneret


Top
 Profile  
 
Timbo Slice
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 1:48 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 2708
No penalty. What a joke. This makes me so mad. Are there going to have to be 10 officials on the ice? Or more? This is disgusting.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:01 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Check out this video made by a fan...a much better look than NESN had.
http://www.nesn.com/2010/03/matt-cookes ... n-nhl.html


Intent to injure...no question in my book.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:05 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
Los9090 wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
THAT is the blindside hit I'm talking about.

That could be penalized just like boarding. Open ice hits should be from the front only, so players have a fighting chance at defending themselves.

Good point there. Can't believe there was no call. :evil:


the ref must not have seen it. they would have called that. but as a ref once told me "we cant call what we cant see. i cant make a call based on the aftermath with a guy on the ice. i cant make a call when i hear a high stick, but dont see it."

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
sabretoothpick
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:08 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 1877
Location: Graz, Austria
Make an example out of him and suspend him for the rest of the season.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:22 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
the ref must not have seen it. they would have called that. but as a ref once told me "we cant call what we cant see. i cant make a call based on the aftermath with a guy on the ice. i cant make a call when i hear a high stick, but dont see it."


That's a reasonable argument, but with 4 officials on the ice? That's inexcusable. The linesman can't can penalties themselves, but they are able to (and by rule SUPPOSED to) tell the referee if they saw something, and the referee can call a penalty on it. You never see if happen, but they have that ability.


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:53 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
Squanto wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
the ref must not have seen it. they would have called that. but as a ref once told me "we cant call what we cant see. i cant make a call based on the aftermath with a guy on the ice. i cant make a call when i hear a high stick, but dont see it."


That's a reasonable argument, but with 4 officials on the ice? That's inexcusable. The linesman can't can penalties themselves, but they are able to (and by rule SUPPOSED to) tell the referee if they saw something, and the referee can call a penalty on it. You never see if happen, but they have that ability.


Too many officials are too concerned with sticking up for one another.

I umpired little league for three years, and there were a few guys that would say, "if I have to check a call just agree with me so there's no problems." And this is in a low pressure situation for freaking kids, I can't imagine what goes on in professional sports.

I never agreed with that mantra, it was always, get it right. Period. Paragraph.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:07 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
Well it wasn't an elbow.

But you can eliminate most blows to the head just by disallowing blind side hits at open ice.

The Neil hit on Drury was just like this. Legal by the rule book now, but dangerous and cheap.

No blind side hits = no defenseless hits.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Albatross
PostPosted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:08 pm 
Offline
First Rounder

Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:55 pm
Posts: 142
I'm all for hard nosed physical hockey but seriously this kind of fucking shit has to stop. Make an example out of him: I'd say 20 games.

_________________
Sloppy seconds = 6 games "clean" headhunting = nothing
it's obvious Bettman and Campbell are Pens cocksuckers


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: