Redden to the Islanders?
http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/ |
|
| Redden placed on waivers http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4379 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Squanto [ Sat Sep 25, 2010 12:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Redden placed on waivers |
Not that we didn't see this coming... http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/blog/puck_d ... nhl-272311 |
|
| Author: | PuckSniperPensel [ Sat Sep 25, 2010 2:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
Only took Sather how long? |
|
| Author: | SabreWolf [ Sat Sep 25, 2010 2:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
Just for the record, if Redden was even say 3.5M, I would want him on our team. |
|
| Author: | Seanothan27 [ Sat Sep 25, 2010 3:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
Worst.Contract.Ever Sucks for him though, to be burried in the AHL at 33. Oh well, he had to have seen this coming.. |
|
| Author: | ironyisadeadscene [ Sat Sep 25, 2010 3:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
can the rangers loan him out to an overseas league if they so desired? |
|
| Author: | fan4life61 [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
Seanothan27 wrote: Worst.Contract.Ever Sucks for him though, to be burried in the AHL at 33. Oh well, he had to have seen this coming.. can't redden refuse to show in hartford, then forfeit the rest of his contract and become a free agent? |
|
| Author: | ironyisadeadscene [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
he could, i think. but then he would be labeled a problem and no one would want him. except the rangers. and they just dumped him! http://www.sportsargumentwiki.com/index ... ade_Redden |
|
| Author: | fly as hale [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
I, for one, am shocked. |
|
| Author: | Stuuuuuuu [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 1:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
We're gonna start seeing more and more teams do this I think, as the fallout from ridiculous contracts starts to actually take effect. Waiving players is going to have to become a part of teams' business models, a trick of the trade. |
|
| Author: | patkane88 [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
SabreWolf wrote: Just for the record, if Redden was even say 3.5M, I would want him on our team. Why though, he really is not that good |
|
| Author: | ironyisadeadscene [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
redden a few years ago was a BEAST. he was good. |
|
| Author: | mechaphil [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
He was really good...on a team with defensive depth that could cover his mistakes and a forward corps that made him look good with lots of assists. |
|
| Author: | patkane88 [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
mechaphil wrote: He was really good...on a team with defensive depth that could cover his mistakes and a forward corps that made him look good with lots of assists. Very true and now with the Rangers they all run around like idiots. |
|
| Author: | ironyisadeadscene [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
mechaphil wrote: He was really good...on a team with defensive depth that could cover his mistakes and a forward corps that made him look good with lots of assists. i disagree. i think he was a major major asset to those sens teams. |
|
| Author: | SabreWolf [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
Redden to the Islanders?
|
|
| Author: | daz28 [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 7:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
Now I know this isn't circumvention, because of the wording, but a rose by any other name is still a rose. I'll bet NJ is thrilled they(Rangers) are allowed to do this, yet they got stripped of two big picks. This shit is just foolish if you ask me. As I've said before, I wouldn't even join a fantasy league that was run as shoddy as this. |
|
| Author: | HelloMyKneeGrows [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
Stuuuuuuu wrote: We're gonna start seeing more and more teams do this I think, as the fallout from ridiculous contracts starts to actually take effect. Waiving players is going to have to become a part of teams' business models, a trick of the trade. And this is exactly what Regier has said the last three years. He goes out and get solid, minute crunching D-Men (Montador, Morrison, to a lesser extent Leopold) all on the cheap and other teams make stupid moves like signing Wade Redden to a 6 year, $39 million contract or Brian Campbell for a 8 years, $56 million. Then they end up paying for it two years later.....that Campbell deal alone cost them most of the moves they had to make to dump salary this off-season. Just think what $7.1 mil a season could have let them keep...... |
|
| Author: | SabreWolf [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 9:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
HelloMyKneeGrows wrote: Stuuuuuuu wrote: We're gonna start seeing more and more teams do this I think, as the fallout from ridiculous contracts starts to actually take effect. Waiving players is going to have to become a part of teams' business models, a trick of the trade. And this is exactly what Regier has said the last three years. He goes out and get solid, minute crunching D-Men (Montador, Morrison, to a lesser extent Leopold) all on the cheap and other teams make stupid moves like signing Wade Redden to a 6 year, $39 million contract or Brian Campbell for a 8 years, $56 million. Then they end up paying for it two years later.....that Campbell deal alone cost them most of the moves they had to make to dump salary this off-season. Just think what $7.1 mil a season could have let them keep...... Campbell and Huet is something like 12.5M... |
|
| Author: | HelloMyKneeGrows [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
SabreWolf wrote: HelloMyKneeGrows wrote: Stuuuuuuu wrote: We're gonna start seeing more and more teams do this I think, as the fallout from ridiculous contracts starts to actually take effect. Waiving players is going to have to become a part of teams' business models, a trick of the trade. And this is exactly what Regier has said the last three years. He goes out and get solid, minute crunching D-Men (Montador, Morrison, to a lesser extent Leopold) all on the cheap and other teams make stupid moves like signing Wade Redden to a 6 year, $39 million contract or Brian Campbell for a 8 years, $56 million. Then they end up paying for it two years later.....that Campbell deal alone cost them most of the moves they had to make to dump salary this off-season. Just think what $7.1 mil a season could have let them keep...... Campbell and Huet is something like 12.5M... And as much as everyone complains about their contracts and production, toss another $1.5 on those two and you get Connolly, Roy and Pommers.....I say win |
|
| Author: | Skyline_BNR34 [ Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redden placed on waivers |
Those long deals are only good for players like a Sidney Crosby, Malkin, Ovechkin, Stamkos, Myers, Miller, Chara, Pronger, Toews, Kane, you get the idea. Those long deals are good for certain players, but not everyone deserves those contracts. If you really are deserving of a deal like that, you prove it your entire existence in the league, by producing. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|