Wow, I just watched the overtime of the game. The Flyers scored in the last second but it didn't count because the clock turned to 0.0 right when the puck was on the line. 0.1 earlier and it would have counted.
love when the Flyers are unlucky.http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/ |
|
| San Jose @ Philli http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5091 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | sabretoothpick [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | San Jose @ Philli |
Wow, I just watched the overtime of the game. The Flyers scored in the last second but it didn't count because the clock turned to 0.0 right when the puck was on the line. 0.1 earlier and it would have counted. love when the Flyers are unlucky. |
|
| Author: | sabretoothpick [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
Sharks win it in the shootout. Brutal 
|
|
| Author: | Skyline_BNR34 [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
My one friend is a Flyers fan so he's super pissed. |
|
| Author: | powerplayer [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
Rulz is rulz. Of course if this was basketball....that bitch woulda counted. |
|
| Author: | sabresindc [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
Now that's splitting hairs but the rules say that if time expires before the puck crosses the line it doesn't count....hehehehe |
|
| Author: | sabresindc [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 10:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
Official video from NHL.com. Everyone was convinced it went in before the time expired.  |
|
| Author: | CriminallyVu1gar [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
I kind of think that play should continue after the clock expires during a shot until someone touches the puck. |
|
| Author: | BlueandYellow [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
I watched that game. I don't understand why the announcers are so sure the goal counted because it looked fishy when 1 second was left and he shot the puck. The refs were really brutal in that game. Penalties going unnoticed. The Flyers were absolutely jacked out of that game. |
|
| Author: | Squanto [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
CriminallyVu1gar wrote: I kind of think that play should continue after the clock expires during a shot until someone touches the puck. Too much of a judgement call there. The officials screw up all the other judgement calls they have to make. Why add one more? |
|
| Author: | jvaccaro6 [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
I swear the NHL Refs and Amy Winehouse have the same amount of ability to make a good judgment call...just sayin... |
|
| Author: | Skyline_BNR34 [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
The only thing I think is, if the shot is off before the buzzer, it's a live puck until it gets deflected or covered. But since it's not, HAHAHAHAHAHA. |
|
| Author: | CriminallyVu1gar [ Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
Squanto wrote: CriminallyVu1gar wrote: I kind of think that play should continue after the clock expires during a shot until someone touches the puck. Too much of a judgement call there. The officials screw up all the other judgement calls they have to make. Why add one more? I don't think it would be a judgment call. If anything it would just result in a video review, which is exactly what we got in the Philly - SJ game anyways. I just see it like basketball, the ball doesn't have to go through the basket in time, merely be released in time. I think the same should be true for hockey, then if it's deflected, or hits the goalie with no time left, game/period over. Is there any question? Spend 2 minutes reviewing it. |
|
| Author: | Skyline_BNR34 [ Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: San Jose @ Philli |
CriminallyVu1gar wrote: Squanto wrote: CriminallyVu1gar wrote: I kind of think that play should continue after the clock expires during a shot until someone touches the puck. Too much of a judgement call there. The officials screw up all the other judgement calls they have to make. Why add one more? I don't think it would be a judgment call. If anything it would just result in a video review, which is exactly what we got in the Philly - SJ game anyways. I just see it like basketball, the ball doesn't have to go through the basket in time, merely be released in time. I think the same should be true for hockey, then if it's deflected, or hits the goalie with no time left, game/period over. Is there any question? Spend 2 minutes reviewing it. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|