http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/ |
|
| Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. http://www.sabresjunkie.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=3302 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | NYIntensity [ Mon May 10, 2010 7:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
I'm supposed to be comparing 32 vs 64 bit Win 7 for my recommendation for the Marine Corps. To me, it's pretty glaring. The operating forces have old gear (printers, etc). This is a short and sweet point paper I'm making. What am I missing, and do I have anything wrong? (XC, Squanto, SATW, in particular?) - To take advantage of the memory addressing of 64 bit, you need to have at least 4gb of RAM. - 64 bit does NOT support hardware with 32 bit drivers. - Some 32 bit programs will simply NOT run on 64 bit OS; others will run at degraded performance levels. - Not all software will even take advantage of the extra memory that a 64 bit OS supports unless it has been programmed with a 64 bit processor in mind - 16 bit applications WON’T run (not sure if we even have any in the environment any more) In short, unless the user is running resource-hungry applications (Photoshop, video editing software, AutoCAD, etc), a 32 bit OS is a safer bet to maintain customer satisfaction and continuity of service. |
|
| Author: | Crosscheck [ Mon May 10, 2010 7:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
In short, to take advantage of a 64bit OS, you need to have a single process addressing more than 2Gb of memory. Even if you use photoshop heavily, that usage is hard to achieve...maybe video editing large files. If you're making a recommendation for desktops/laptops/workstations then there's no practical reason to recommend 64bit IMHO. The real advantage is in server/database applications or purpose built workstations for, as you mentioned, CAD or video editing. Others please chime in, that's just my $.02 64 bit has been around for decades, it's just trendy in the consumer market now...why, I have no idea. |
|
| Author: | NYIntensity [ Mon May 10, 2010 7:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
Crosscheck wrote: In short, to take advantage of a 64bit OS, you need to have a single process addressing more than 2Gb of memory. Even if you use photoshop heavily, that usage is hard to achieve...maybe video editing large files. If you're making a recommendation for desktops/laptops/workstations then there's no practical reason to recommend 64bit IMHO. The real advantage is in server/database applications or purpose built workstations for, as you mentioned, CAD or video editing. Others please chime in, that's just my $.02 64 bit has been around for decades, it's just trendy in the consumer market now...why, I have no idea. Definitely just workstations; our servers are mostly 64 bit running ESX 4.0, AFAIK. Of course there are some legacy systems, but they've done a good job updating and migrating as much as possible. We're about to pilot a P2V program (I just love abbreviating that...childish, I know) to try to start reeling in the stragglers. |
|
| Author: | mechaphil [ Mon May 10, 2010 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
Quote: P2V i lold |
|
| Author: | NYIntensity [ Mon May 10, 2010 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
mechaphil wrote: Quote: P2V i lold Thanks. Really, it means Physical to Virtual (server speak) |
|
| Author: | CriminallyVu1gar [ Mon May 10, 2010 10:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
I have 64 bit vista and 8 GB of ram...you know...for the apocalypse. |
|
| Author: | Skyline_BNR34 [ Tue May 11, 2010 1:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
CriminallyVu1gar wrote: I have 64 bit vista and 8 GB of ram...you know...for the apocalypse. Do you also have an unlimited supply of .22 ammo also? |
|
| Author: | YankeeInRaleigh [ Tue May 11, 2010 4:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
Seeing as how 64 is a bigger number than 32 (almost TWICE as big!) i'd say 64 must be better. All I know is i've got a dual core dell with 64 bit vista, and I can have like...27 porn vids running at once, it's fucking incredible. |
|
| Author: | NYIntensity [ Tue May 11, 2010 4:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
YankeeInRaleigh wrote: Seeing as how 64 is a bigger number than 32 (almost TWICE as big!) i'd say 64 must be better. All I know is i've got a dual core dell with 64 bit vista, and I can have like...27 porn vids running at once, it's fucking incredible. You've probably got boatloads of memory. When it comes to Vista, it's a prerequisite for you to even be able to boot. |
|
| Author: | CriminallyVu1gar [ Tue May 11, 2010 4:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
YankeeInRaleigh wrote: Seeing as how 64 is a bigger number than 32 (almost TWICE as big!) i'd say 64 must be better. All I know is i've got a dual core dell with 64 bit vista, and I can have like...27 porn vids running at once, it's fucking incredible. lol me too! |
|
| Author: | PatGreen [ Tue May 11, 2010 5:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
mechaphil wrote: Quote: P2V i lold i don't get it. |
|
| Author: | Montalo [ Tue May 11, 2010 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
PatGreen wrote: mechaphil wrote: Quote: P2V i lold i don't get it. penis to vagina |
|
| Author: | NYIntensity [ Tue May 11, 2010 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
Montalo wrote: PatGreen wrote: mechaphil wrote: Quote: P2V i lold i don't get it. penis to vagina
|
|
| Author: | Skyline_BNR34 [ Tue May 11, 2010 10:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
NYIntensity wrote: YankeeInRaleigh wrote: Seeing as how 64 is a bigger number than 32 (almost TWICE as big!) i'd say 64 must be better. All I know is i've got a dual core dell with 64 bit vista, and I can have like...27 porn vids running at once, it's fucking incredible. You've probably got boatloads of memory. When it comes to Vista, it's a prerequisite for you to even be able to boot. I wish this computer has more, because it always is running 70% at Vista idle, yes it only has 1 GB of RAM. Which sucks badly. |
|
| Author: | BlueandYellow [ Tue May 11, 2010 10:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
NYIntensity wrote: Montalo wrote: PatGreen wrote: mechaphil wrote: Quote: P2V i lold i don't get it. penis to vagina ![]()
|
|
| Author: | PatGreen [ Tue May 11, 2010 11:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
i don't get it |
|
| Author: | patkane88 [ Tue May 11, 2010 11:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
YankeeInRaleigh wrote: Seeing as how 64 is a bigger number than 32 (almost TWICE as big!) i'd say 64 must be better. All I know is i've got a dual core dell with 64 bit vista, and I can have like...27 porn vids running at once, it's fucking incredible.
|
|
| Author: | Sabres2Sabres [ Wed May 12, 2010 12:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
Wait...64 is almost twice as big as 32? I had the impression it is twice as big as 32. |
|
| Author: | Skyline_BNR34 [ Wed May 12, 2010 12:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
Sabres2Sabres wrote: Wait...64 is almost twice as big as 32? I had the impression it is twice as big as 32. Haha, same here now that you mention it. |
|
| Author: | YankeeInRaleigh [ Wed May 12, 2010 9:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Geek advice? 32 vs 64 bit OS. |
Sabres2Sabres wrote: Wait...64 is almost twice as big as 32? I had the impression it is twice as big as 32. oh, you must be using the "New Math"...damned kids, with your music! |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|