Sabresfansince1980 wrote:
I don't think it's much intrusion on the pace of the game to review goal/no-goal situations. If the goal was awarded there is a stoppage anyway. If a goal isn't awarded a review would/should take 1-2 minutes. The rate at which replays are shown during the broadcast is remarkable. A goal review judge would have the replays within seconds and be able to communicate with the referee immediately after the review. Play could continue unless the no-goal call is reversed. Stop play and reset the ball at midfield.
In either scenario just start the clock over from the time of the goal/no-goal, or just add on another minute or two to extra time. The impact of blowing a goal call is much greater than interrupting the pace or the clock.
Agreed. Plus, how many of these blown calls have been in the "really fucking obvious" realm within ten seconds of looking at a replay? Problem is most refs feel like they need to take a minute or more to look like a replay to give the impression that they're really thinking hard about it or something.
People get so romanticized about sports. Baseball is the absolute worst. People get this notion of how the game "should be" in their heads and are so resistant to change things as technology improves.
Like the Jim Joyce call, or any close play at a base in baseball. It's not like baseball isn't absolutely plodding anyways. We can't have say a booth official looking at every base replay and turning on a light or something if the call is blatantly wrong (close plays always stand as called)? Really? We're willing to be wrong in order to preserve some imagined "integrity of the game?" Really?