It is currently Wed Jun 10, 2026 5:53 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
jvaccaro6
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:35 pm 
Offline
Certifiably Hotter than ETC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 3689
Look, I dislike Drew Stafford as much as the next guy, but anybody who thinks Ellis should play and Stafford should sit needs to get their heads examined. Stafford is a decent skill player, capable of putting up some decent numbers when not playing against teams top checking lines. Put him at 3rd or 4th line RW. Sit Kennedy or Ellis.

Kennedy is a ghost 99% of the time, and in the box more often than not. Penalties will kill you in playoffs. Ellis is a decent player, but puts up as many points as Andrew Peters.

_________________
"She's like plan C after an 18 pack"

Squanto 7/27/2010


Top
 Profile  
 
SabresBillsFan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:38 pm 
Offline
Power Forward

Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:08 pm
Posts: 1217
jvaccaro6 wrote:
Look, I dislike Drew Stafford as much as the next guy, but anybody who thinks Ellis should play and Stafford should sit needs to get their heads examined. Stafford is a decent skill player, capable of putting up some decent numbers when not playing against teams top checking lines. Put him at 3rd or 4th line RW. Sit Kennedy or Ellis.

Kennedy is a ghost 99% of the time, and in the box more often than not. Penalties will kill you in playoffs. Ellis is a decent player, but puts up as many points as Andrew Peters.


I agree I will take Stafford's Skill over Ellis any day of the week. I also agree that Kennedy is a ghost about 99% of the time. I just don't see why no one is jumping all over his ass.


Top
 Profile  
 
jvaccaro6
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:41 pm 
Offline
Certifiably Hotter than ETC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 3689
SabresBillsFan wrote:
jvaccaro6 wrote:
Look, I dislike Drew Stafford as much as the next guy, but anybody who thinks Ellis should play and Stafford should sit needs to get their heads examined. Stafford is a decent skill player, capable of putting up some decent numbers when not playing against teams top checking lines. Put him at 3rd or 4th line RW. Sit Kennedy or Ellis.

Kennedy is a ghost 99% of the time, and in the box more often than not. Penalties will kill you in playoffs. Ellis is a decent player, but puts up as many points as Andrew Peters.


I agree I will take Stafford's Skill over Ellis any day of the week. I also agree that Kennedy is a ghost about 99% of the time. I just don't see why no one is jumping all over his ass.


With a few members, who are less active now, you'd get your throat jumped down if you even dared call out a local kid.

_________________
"She's like plan C after an 18 pack"

Squanto 7/27/2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:42 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
jvaccaro6 wrote:
Look, I dislike Drew Stafford as much as the next guy, but anybody who thinks Ellis should play and Stafford should sit needs to get their heads examined. Stafford is a decent skill player, capable of putting up some decent numbers when not playing against teams top checking lines. Put him at 3rd or 4th line RW. Sit Kennedy or Ellis.

Kennedy is a ghost 99% of the time, and in the box more often than not. Penalties will kill you in playoffs. Ellis is a decent player, but puts up as many points as Andrew Peters.


Talent wise, Stafford obviously beats Ellis.

But at the end of the day, I personally don't want a skill guy with zero effort on my 4th line that I rely on to give my team some energy.

Stafford's play as of late has been anti climatic. At least Ellis plays with a reckless abandon.

If we were just trying to load the lineup with as much talent as possible, Ennis would have been up playing for Mair or Ellis a long time ago. But that's not how you win hockey games.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:08 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
jvaccaro6 wrote:
Look, I dislike Drew Stafford as much as the next guy, but anybody who thinks Ellis should play and Stafford should sit needs to get their heads examined. Stafford is a decent skill player, capable of putting up some decent numbers when not playing against teams top checking lines. Put him at 3rd or 4th line RW. Sit Kennedy or Ellis.

Kennedy is a ghost 99% of the time, and in the box more often than not. Penalties will kill you in playoffs. Ellis is a decent player, but puts up as many points as Andrew Peters.

I would like to see Kennedy up on LW with Connolly and Pommers. Kennedy digs in the corners and behind the net and he has a tight turn radius. If Connolly can stay in the slot and Pommers roam around the right face off circle ready to shoot I think Kennedy turns out be a playmaking LWer.

Put Hecht/Torres on a line with Goose and Stafford.
Put Mair centering Kaleta and Hecht/Torres if necessary.

The bigger picture on that line make up is the absence of Grier and/or the absence of a true 3 line center. I mean, Grier is a great 2 way, defensive RWer, but I wouldn't resign him if we keep Stafford. Thats an off season decision though. The current situation heading into the playoffs is a different story.
Thats why I'd like to see Ennis up centering Torres and Stafford. Torres can score, so can Stafford. Maybe Ennis gives them that edge, who knows.

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:22 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
I'd love to have Kennedy on the wing on one of the top 2 lines.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
daz28
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:31 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 3363
If it's up to TV, then Mancari will stay. I know no one is supposed to be excited, but Vanek seemed pretty hyped up when he pointed to Mark after that perfect dish from behind the net. As for Stafford or Ellis? I'll take the guy who plays pk, too. If young Butler can sit, then surely 'on his way to journeyman'(if he's lucky) Stafford can also. Kennedy on top 2, nah. He impresses me less offensively, and more defensively every day. This may be a good thing? If his offense comes around that is.


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:35 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
daz28 wrote:
If it's up to TV, then Mancari will stay. I know no one is supposed to be excited, but Vanek seemed pretty hyped up when he pointed to Mark after that perfect dish from behind the net. As for Stafford or Ellis? I'll take the guy who plays pk, too. If young Butler can sit, then surely 'on his way to journeyman'(if he's lucky) Stafford can also. Kennedy on top 2, nah. He impresses me less offensively, and more defensively every day. This may be a good thing? If his offense comes around that is.

You have to give the kid an offensive shot to see his offense. Right now he is stuck playing with defensive 2 way forwards without alot, if any, offensive talents. This in my opinion, is hampering Kennedy's ability to produce offensively.
He was not a center with the farm club, nor with the minors, why stick at a position he clearly is not comfortable with?

Also, as I stated in another post, I think Kennedy with Connolly is a huge confidence boost for this kid.

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:40 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
Kennedy with Connolly would be unreal. It would give Tim a chance to just let loose on offense a little bit.

Timmah Squared. Sounds good to me.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:53 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
While Kennedy deserves a little heat, it should be remembered that he is still a noob. He's not playing horribly for a guy with only 62 NHL games under his belt.

He does need to keep his PIMs down, he's high in that department for a non-enforcer/agitator,no doubt about that.

I don't give him a lot of heat simply because he's a rook still, not because he's from our hood.


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:54 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
T2?

Image

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
psychemedisabrefan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:14 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 2138
Location: Pendleton, NY
I was just thinking If mancari shows any promise it increases his trade value I mean he wanted one last season if he wasn't going to get a roster spot. If the guy is going to come to play every night, with the odd off game here and there, I want him on my team but if this is an attempt to just get paid, and the laziness will set in the better he plays the more value he accumulates.

_________________
"Tis The Season, Fa la la la la LaFontaine" - Rick Jeanneret


Top
 Profile  
 
SabresBillsFan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 7:21 pm 
Offline
Power Forward

Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:08 pm
Posts: 1217
Squanto wrote:
While Kennedy deserves a little heat, it should be remembered that he is still a noob. He's not playing horribly for a guy with only 62 NHL games under his belt.

He does need to keep his PIMs down, he's high in that department for a non-enforcer/agitator,no doubt about that.

I don't give him a lot of heat simply because he's a rook still, not because he's from our hood.


I agree with Squanto on this and that's the only reason why I'm not giving the kid heat because he's a rookie. But at the end of the day when you look at everything Mancari hasn't been given as many games as Kennedy has and you can't really justify Mancari play last season or the time before on just a handful of games. I see some potential with Mancari that Kennedy doesn't have and that's being very headups with the puck and has a booming shot. He just needs to hustle more and use the big body of his to create more chances. So far he's playing well and hopefully can keep it up it would be a boost to the sabres some extra offense. On the other hand Kennedy in my opinion has been less and less noticeable each game but he's a rookie and I expect players to be learning and suppose to be getting better each game. Yeah it might be who he's paired with but you also have to look at it a different way their was one spot open on the team for him or Gerbe and he beat Gerbe out in the preseason for the last spot. So you have to go where your needed.


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 12:35 am 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
slesh wrote:
daz28 wrote:
If it's up to TV, then Mancari will stay. I know no one is supposed to be excited, but Vanek seemed pretty hyped up when he pointed to Mark after that perfect dish from behind the net. As for Stafford or Ellis? I'll take the guy who plays pk, too. If young Butler can sit, then surely 'on his way to journeyman'(if he's lucky) Stafford can also. Kennedy on top 2, nah. He impresses me less offensively, and more defensively every day. This may be a good thing? If his offense comes around that is.

You have to give the kid an offensive shot to see his offense. Right now he is stuck playing with defensive 2 way forwards without alot, if any, offensive talents. This in my opinion, is hampering Kennedy's ability to produce offensively.
He was not a center with the farm club, nor with the minors, why stick at a position he clearly is not comfortable with?

Also, as I stated in another post, I think Kennedy with Connolly is a huge confidence boost for this kid.

I think the best reason to stick him at Center is because with Hecht playing like he has you don't move him. If Hecht was playing like he did last year I'd be all for Kennedy playing 2nd line LW, but with him having to play a more responsible defensive role I'm all up for that also, gives us a great two-way forward who will light the lamp when he is playing top 6 minutes.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
VanekKing
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:09 am 
Offline
Penalty Killer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:14 pm
Posts: 609
Location: Clarence, NY
Mancari nreaking out of his shell..


..and being shoved back in it :lol:

_________________
Miller, Myers and Greir are sick, but not Jesus Christ..

KILL OTTAWA


Top
 Profile  
 
HelloMyKneeGrows
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:46 am 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:41 pm
Posts: 929
Location: Greece, NY
VanekKing wrote:
Mancari nreaking out of his shell..


..and being shoved back in it :lol:


Yeah, this organization seems to hate this guy for some reason.

_________________
"I can't really hear what Jeremy says, because I got my two Stanley Cup Rings plugging my ears...." -Patrick Roy in reference to Jeremy Roenick's trash talking


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:49 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
now, i heard this was actually not a send down, but a "loan." thus, recalling him wouldnt count against the 4 recall rule after the deadline.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:03 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
now, i heard this was actually not a send down, but a "loan." thus, recalling him wouldnt count against the 4 recall rule after the deadline.

I, too, have noticed the word "loan" being used in regards to this transaction...hmm...

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:05 pm 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
mechaphil wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
now, i heard this was actually not a send down, but a "loan." thus, recalling him wouldnt count against the 4 recall rule after the deadline.

I, too, have noticed the word "loan" being used in regards to this transaction...hmm...

We own him anyways.

But what if a freak accident happened to the NHL team and 5 players got hurt, and they had to recall 5 players up?

I've never heard this rule about NHL/AHL transfers and such and I always thought if the player can clear waivers he can be recalled from Portland anytime the team needs him, since they are property of the Buffalo Sabres.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:08 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
its just the rules. i dont know why, but thats the rules.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron