|
Why hasn’t Buffalo won a NFL or NHL championship?
That is the question that haunts Buffalo sports fans. Yes, the Bills were two time AFL champs, but that was a long time ago and during an era when the best teams in football were still in the NFL. Buffalo can also boast of three minor league baseball championships, and four indoor lacrosse championships, but I think we all know that nobody get too excited about winning that hardware.
We want the Vince Lombardi trophy and the Stanley Cup.
People talk about Buffalo’s handicap as a small market team, so I guess it is fair to compare us with a similar city only 225 miles to the south - Pittsburgh.
Whereas we have only runner-up memories of nearly great teams, they have been so much more successful, winning five World Series championships, six Super Bowls, and three Stanley Cups. These are two very similar cities, in size, history, and geography, yet they have build small market champions and we have not.
What makes Pittsburgh so much more successful in sports than Buffalo?
Both cities are about the same size in area (58.3 sq. miles for Pittsburgh; 52.5 sq. miles for Buffalo). Pittsburgh’s nearly 317,000 population is slightly more than Buffalo’s 272,000 people, but not a great deal more. Both cities peaked in population in the 1950s, with Pittsburgh listed as the 12th largest city in American and Buffalo the 15th.
Both cities have lost population in every census since then, with Buffalo back to its 1890s population.
Pittsburgh was hit hard by competition with German and Japanese steel in the 1970s and 1980s. Buffalo was hurt by the opening of the St. Lawrence Seaway in 1957, which allowed shippers to bypass the New York state canal system. Both cities experienced white flight to the suburbs and Rust Belt to Sun Belt population shifts in the 1980s. Today Pittsburgh is the 60th largest city in America (a little smaller than New Orleans, a little larger than Toledo) and Buffalo is the 69th largest (a little smaller than Anchorage, a little larger than Lincoln, Ne.). The difference is not in our size or history.
The answer might be in the economies of the two cities. Both cities have attempted to diversify their economies, shifting from manufacturing to medical, banking, and more high-tech jobs, however Pittsburgh appears to have been more successful.
There are nine Fortune 500 companies with headquarters in Pittsburgh, which puts them at #8 for cities with Fortune 500 headquarters. Buffalo has one (M&T Bank). Pittsburgh has an average household median income that is about $4,000 higher than Buffalo and a per capita average income that is also about $4,000 more than the average Buffalonian. Buffalo has 8% more families living below poverty than does Pittsburgh. In fact, Buffalo is one of the poorest cities in the U.S. with populations of more than 250,000 people. Only Detroit and Cleveland have higher poverty rates, and only Miami and Cleveland have a lower median household income.
Pittsburgh is listed by Forbes magazine as the 13th best city for young professionals to live. They were also was named "America's Most Livable City" by Places Rated Almanac in 2007. Furthermore, in 2009, Pittsburgh was named most livable city in the United States and 29th-most-livable city worldwide by the British newspaper, The Economist. Buffalo is investing more in the city, but it still has a ways to go before it starts topping the lists of best places to live and work.
This difference in the economic base, with more fans in Pittsburgh able to financially support sports teams that can spend more money on better talent, might explain why two very similar cities in size and history have had two very different experiences when it comes to winning championships.
_________________ "Go out and run 'em." - Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007
|