Meh, I like Ice's rule #1 above all else.
Begin rant:
I think if anyone has a problem with something posted by another member, I'd like to see them settle the matter or at least express their views and/or concerns in a PM, without attacking or lashing out at each other either in said PM or the thread in question. Then, adjust the post or thread accordingly. Airing out dirty laundry in public is never a good idea; I don’t care what anyone says. The Mods likely have more important crap on their plates to deal with instead of reviewing what could very well be considered a low or no priority issue that really shouldn't have been reported in the first place. (EG: “Bobby/Betty called me a name and pushed me down!!!
“ *sniff sniff)
IMO, if we can police ourselves in the name of respect then things should be fine. They (the Mods) shouldn't have everyone and their dog claiming some kind of assault or attack if by chance it appears as though a member of this grand place has said or posted something which has been taken completely out of context. (Asking someone to explain what they meant by their post would be a good thing instead of calling them a, “No good cocksucker” before finding out the reasons for their views or opinions)
If, however things do get out of hand regarding a thread or post, then by all means bring the Mods into play and let them decide if the matter should be dealt with on a higher level and warnings or punishments be handed down. If the Mods are unable to come to a conclusion on the matter, then consulting with the warden of this asylum should be the next step on the ladder. That individual being the honorable, Crosscheck.
Ultimately, Ice’s rule pretty much outlines the text diarrhea I just shat everywhere above.
Don’t be a douche.
End rant.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
