It is currently Fri May 29, 2026 10:21 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
Rud
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 8:20 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 4121
Location: Hamburg
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36352097/ns ... ws-europe/

Quote:
SMOLENSK, Russia - The crash of an aging Russian airliner ravaged the top levels of Poland's military, political and church elite Saturday, killing the Polish president and dozens of other dignitaries as they traveled to a ceremony commemorating a slaughter that has divided the two nations for seven decades.

Poles wept before their televisions, lowered flags to half-staff and taped black ribbons in their windows after hearing that the upper echelons of the establishment lay dead in woods a short drive from the site of the Katyn forest massacre, one of Poland's greatest national traumas.

Thousands of people, many in tears, placed candles and flowers at the presidential palace in central Warsaw. Many called the crash Poland's worst disaster since World War II


This is unbelievably tragic.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Melly317
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:44 pm 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 1335
Location: Tonawanda
I read this earlier. The location where the plan crashed is kind of eerie. They crashed near the memorial of a massacre they were going to commemorate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre

_________________
this place feels more like home, with one big happy family :romance-grouphug:


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:44 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Holy shit, imagine the level of chaos going on in Polish government right now.

Raise a glass of Tyskie in memory of all those lost.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Van_Da_Man
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 11:12 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:07 pm
Posts: 2313
Location: Wisconsin
That country has had nothing but problems over the last hundred years. :(

_________________
"Call a cop he robbed Delmore blind!!!"
Rick Jeanerette after Marty Biron's diving save back in 2000.

"I'm going to go to the spa and have a hot tub and massage and relax," Miller said. "That's it, and it's back to work tomorrow." Ryan Miller after clinching the North East division.


Top
 Profile  
 
acrossthelines
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:50 am 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 4192
Yeah, read about that. That's a lot of people. :(

Poland's had it rough.

_________________
Miles to go before I sleep

‎"Love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation."
-Khalil Gibran


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:59 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
i dont get why poland is so cursed.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:45 am 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
This is really sad, but here's what I don't understand...My company (a sizable internet firm with offices all around the country) has an explicit travel policy about how many members of the same department can fly on a plane together or how many upper level executives can fly on a plane together. It's a fairly common business continuity practice.

We have similar policies in our own government...why didn't Poland?
There were FAR too many important people on that plane.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:38 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
How about this - why the hell was the PRESIDENT of Poland on a 20 year old airplane?!

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:40 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Crosscheck wrote:
This is really sad, but here's what I don't understand...My company (a sizable internet firm with offices all around the country) has an explicit travel policy about how many members of the same department can fly on a plane together or how many upper level executives can fly on a plane together. It's a fairly common business continuity practice.

We have similar policies in our own government...why didn't Poland?
There were FAR too many important people on that plane.

Your company also probably has a prohibition against flying in out-of-production 20 year old Tupolev planes that were designed by the Soviets in the 1960s (well, maybe your company policy isn't that specific). Polish officials have been complaining about the nation's air fleet for years, although this seems to be more of a pilot error than a mechanical problem.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:43 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
that plane is still produced. youd be shocked how old many of the planes you fly in are. many still flying date back to the 60s and 70s, more in the 80s though.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:46 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Godzilla1960 wrote:
Polish officials have been complaining about the nation's air fleet for years, although this seems to be more of a pilot error than a mechanical problem.


Oh, I know, I'm just amazed they allowed so many high level officials on the same aircraft, no matter what it was.
The age of the plane doesn't really bother me actually (the caveat being that it was properly maintained). The 747 was designed in the 60's and has been flying since 1970 too.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:48 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
that plane is still produced. youd be shocked how old many of the planes you fly in are. many still flying date back to the 60s and 70s, more in the 80s though.

According to the New York Times the Soviets ended mass production of the Tupolev Tu-154 20 years ago.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/world ... anted=2&hp

Crosscheck wrote:
The age of the plane doesn't really bother me actually (the caveat being that it was properly maintained). The 747 was designed in the 60's and has been flying since 1970 too.

The thing that would bother me is that it was Soviet built. I would no sooner fly in plane built in the Soviet Union/Russia than I would eat a food product made in China.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:56 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
We also have a 'hit by a bus compliant' travel policy for my boss and I. We do hang out quite a bit outside of work, and the owner asked us to not travel in the same vehicle when we go out of town.

If we were both incapacitated, our company would be in a world of shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 1:03 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Godzilla1960 wrote:
The thing that would bother me is that it was Soviet built. I would no sooner fly in plane built in the Soviet Union/Russia than I would eat a food product made in China.

I can agree with that. You want scary Soviet era technology?
Go take a walk through the Soviet scorpion submarine they have parked next to the Queen Mary in Long Beach.

Just walking / crawling through that thing scared me and it's parked next to a dock.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
Godzilla1960 wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
that plane is still produced. youd be shocked how old many of the planes you fly in are. many still flying date back to the 60s and 70s, more in the 80s though.

According to the New York Times the Soviets ended mass production of the Tupolev Tu-154 20 years ago.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/world ... anted=2&hp

Crosscheck wrote:
The age of the plane doesn't really bother me actually (the caveat being that it was properly maintained). The 747 was designed in the 60's and has been flying since 1970 too.

The thing that would bother me is that it was Soviet built. I would no sooner fly in plane built in the Soviet Union/Russia than I would eat a food product made in China.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-154

mass production ended in 1998, and they began limited production.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
HelloMyKneeGrows
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:44 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:41 pm
Posts: 929
Location: Greece, NY
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
Godzilla1960 wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
that plane is still produced. youd be shocked how old many of the planes you fly in are. many still flying date back to the 60s and 70s, more in the 80s though.

According to the New York Times the Soviets ended mass production of the Tupolev Tu-154 20 years ago.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/world ... anted=2&hp

Crosscheck wrote:
The age of the plane doesn't really bother me actually (the caveat being that it was properly maintained). The 747 was designed in the 60's and has been flying since 1970 too.

The thing that would bother me is that it was Soviet built. I would no sooner fly in plane built in the Soviet Union/Russia than I would eat a food product made in China.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-154

mass production ended in 1998, and they began limited production.




_________________
"I can't really hear what Jeremy says, because I got my two Stanley Cup Rings plugging my ears...." -Patrick Roy in reference to Jeremy Roenick's trash talking


Top
 Profile  
 
BlueandYellow
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:51 pm 
Offline
Hart Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 9770
Location: Buffalo, NY
Was the vice president on the plane? That would fuck Poland over like never before.

_________________
"Counting all the assholes in the room, I'm definitely not alone!" ~ Michael Poulsen, Volbeat, Still Standing.


Top
 Profile  
 
Godzilla1960
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:29 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 1050
Location: Florida: America's Biggest Ponzi Scheme
Godzilla1960 wrote:
According to the New York Times the Soviets ended mass production of the Tupolev Tu-154 20 years ago.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/world ... anted=2&hp
ironyisadeadscene wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-154

mass production ended in 1998, and they began limited production.

Thanks for the link to the Wikipedia article, irony. I now know more about the Tupolev Tu-154 than I ever thought I would.

It doesn't look like it will be a major issue in the cause of the crash, but I still don't have a definitive answer about when the Russians stopped producing the plane. The New York Times stated the plane ended mass production 20 years ago. You say they ended mass production in 1998.

Your Wikipedia article says that the specific version of this plane, the Tu-154M Lux, ended mass production in 2006 and that no new airframes have been built since the early 1990s (the only production since then has involved assembling airplanes from components on hand - great, they must be building the planes in somebody's back yard). The link for the 1998 date is just an aviation discussion board, not unlike the one we are currently on, and the actual Wikipedia article states that some versions of the plane have been built since then.

If the Wikipedia article is correct, then the New York Times is wrong in stating that the Russians "halted mass production 20 years ago" (the article's authors cite Paul Hayes, director of accidents and insurance at Ascend, as their source for that bit of info).

All this may not matter (except it bugs me when reporters aren't exact in their information) considering that the plane has an average safety record and that mechanical issues were most likely not the cause of this accident. I still wouldn't trust my life to Russian technology.

_________________
"Go out and run 'em."
- Lindy Ruff, 23 Feb. 2007


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:00 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
thank you for the sarcasm.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
HelloMyKneeGrows
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:50 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:41 pm
Posts: 929
Location: Greece, NY
Godzilla1960 wrote:
Godzilla1960 wrote:
According to the New York Times the Soviets ended mass production of the Tupolev Tu-154 20 years ago.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/world ... anted=2&hp
ironyisadeadscene wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-154

mass production ended in 1998, and they began limited production.
I still wouldn't trust my life to Russian technology.[/color]


Wait....you wouldn't trust your life to government funded industry and technology!?!?!?! Good to know.....cause the govn't now owns 60% of our largest automobile manufacturer

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124385428627671889.html

_________________
"I can't really hear what Jeremy says, because I got my two Stanley Cup Rings plugging my ears...." -Patrick Roy in reference to Jeremy Roenick's trash talking


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: