BlueandYellow wrote:
Miller is better than Rask.
Of all the goalies to try and rip, you pick the only one who has better numbers than Miller. You can argue Rask has played less games, but that DOES NOT mean Rask would do worse in the same amount of games. Pure conjecture on your part.
BlueandYellow wrote:
Our goal scorers are better than anyone on Boston IMO,
I'm glad you stuck "IMO" on the end, otherwise that is an absurd statement.
BlueandYellow wrote:
Myers is better than Chara. The reason Chara has so many goals is because he throws it at the net and he gets lucky and the puck dodges around 5 people and in a little slot Miller can't see.
Myers is better than Chara now? Really? Yes, Myers is extremely good FOR A ROOKIE, but he still makes plenty of mistakes out there. He has a very promising career ahead of him and doesn't need such exagerrated praise to be well-thought-of. Careful with the homer hyperbole.
BlueandYellow wrote:
Plus, I love how Lydman is playing, he is better than a few Boston D and so is Rivet and Tallinder...
Careful. The Bruins are 2nd only to the Devils in fewest goals allowed. Their D is pretty solid. Among others, you can thank Chara for that---of course, according to you, he may perhaps be able to pick up a few pointers from Myers

Okay, so Miller isn't better than Rask? Obviously he is... Look at his play. No one can doubt he is better than Rask right now. Rask is good, but Miller is better.
Guess what? Pominville and Roy did WAY better than most of the guys on Boston. Hecht would be their second best goalscorer in the season! Best point leader was 53 points!
Myers is a better skater than Chara. No doubt. They are actually pretty even.
And the reason the Bruins are only second to the Devils in FGA is because those teams both play the trap. That's why the B's have so few goals. Sturm has 22, most goals a Bruin had.