It is currently Sat May 30, 2026 12:47 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
mechaphil
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:52 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
I wanted McCormick or Cowan up specifically to injure Rask. Who gives a shit about a career AHL enforcer.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Los9090
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:57 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:35 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: Glenville, NY
mechaphil wrote:
I wanted McCormick or Cowan up specifically to injure Rask. Who gives a shit about a career AHL enforcer.

I'd like to see one go after Boychuk honestly. Though Mair did put a good lick on him...TOWARDS THE END OF THE DAMN GAME :evil: :evil:

_________________
"...they came down into the stands and asked if I knew how to do play by play. I said...No. But. I'll take a shot at it if you want".- Rick Jeanneret


Top
 Profile  
 
powerplayer
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:59 pm 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:01 pm
Posts: 866
mechaphil wrote:
I wanted McCormick or Cowan up specifically to injure Rask.


Wow.

Well you certainly won't object I'm sure to, say, Lucic or Boychuck injuring Miller...if that's the way the game is to be played?

Great, we'll see Lalime vs. Thomas.

At least all the scorng will be more entertaining.


Top
 Profile  
 
HelloMyKneeGrows
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:10 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:41 pm
Posts: 929
Location: Greece, NY
powerplayer wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
I wanted McCormick or Cowan up specifically to injure Rask.


Wow.

Well you certainly won't object I'm sure to, say, Lucic or Boychuck injuring Miller...if that's the way the game is to be played?

Great, we'll see Lalime vs. Thomas.

At least all the scorng will be more entertaining.


This man apparently doesn't get/like sarcasm

_________________
"I can't really hear what Jeremy says, because I got my two Stanley Cup Rings plugging my ears...." -Patrick Roy in reference to Jeremy Roenick's trash talking


Top
 Profile  
 
powerplayer
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:17 pm 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:01 pm
Posts: 866
HelloMyKneeGrows wrote:
powerplayer wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
I wanted McCormick or Cowan up specifically to injure Rask.


Wow.

Well you certainly won't object I'm sure to, say, Lucic or Boychuck injuring Miller...if that's the way the game is to be played?

Great, we'll see Lalime vs. Thomas.

At least all the scorng will be more entertaining.


This man apparently doesn't get/like sarcasm



I generally bask in sarcasm, but forgive me if I took your comment seriously. There are some around here who would mean such a statement, so your comment didn't strike me as especially out-of-the-norm.


Top
 Profile  
 
squirrel
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:55 pm 
Offline
Rink Rat

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:58 pm
Posts: 28
Poor coaching. No team has won a cup without a powerplay. The players are just doing what Lindy wants them to do. Why the fuck would a coach tell the guys to do the same stupid drop pass in the Neutral zone every time while everyone is stopped dead at the blueline? I just love when I hear Lindy, Rob Ray and other no talent players talking about just closing eyes and shooting on net. Other teams make nice passes and have great plays not just throw it on net from straight on. Watch the other playoff teams play and tell me if they just "throw it on net" after crossing the blueline? LA and Washington had some sweet passing plays the other night. Does Pat Kane just keep it simple and only just throw it on net? Why should Ennis just close his eyes and shoot the puck like Hecht or Lydman. The kid has talent and we should get a coach who will be able to coach him. Makes me sick Lindy benches a rookie who had almost a point per game and had his first career playoff point because Connolly was too slow to receive a pass. Fucking James Patrick went over to Ennis and told the kid to not make passes, just keep it simple and by the way you are done the rest of the game even though we are down a goal(he played 16 seconds the last 5 minutes). I would like to see how Lindy would coach Malkin or Crosby. He would tell them to just shoot it on net and not be too fancy and make sure you make short shifts. They would tell him to shut the fuck up.


Top
 Profile  
 
daz28
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:39 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 3363
squirrel wrote:
Poor coaching. No team has won a cup without a powerplay. The players are just doing what Lindy wants them to do. Why the fuck would a coach tell the guys to do the same stupid drop pass in the Neutral zone every time while everyone is stopped dead at the blueline? I just love when I hear Lindy, Rob Ray and other no talent players talking about just closing eyes and shooting on net. Other teams make nice passes and have great plays not just throw it on net from straight on. Watch the other playoff teams play and tell me if they just "throw it on net" after crossing the blueline? LA and Washington had some sweet passing plays the other night. Does Pat Kane just keep it simple and only just throw it on net? Why should Ennis just close his eyes and shoot the puck like Hecht or Lydman. The kid has talent and we should get a coach who will be able to coach him. Makes me sick Lindy benches a rookie who had almost a point per game and had his first career playoff point because Connolly was too slow to receive a pass. Fucking James Patrick went over to Ennis and told the kid to not make passes, just keep it simple and by the way you are done the rest of the game even though we are down a goal(he played 16 seconds the last 5 minutes). I would like to see how Lindy would coach Malkin or Crosby. He would tell them to just shoot it on net and not be too fancy and make sure you make short shifts. They would tell him to shut the fuck up.

I do NOT have multiple accounts, but if I did this would be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:16 am 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
That same 'stupid drop pass' at the blue line is the method of zone entry most credited to Mike Babcock from the Wings, and is being used throughout the league on a regular basis. It's actually a quite effective way of getting into the zone when the defense stacks 4 across at the line, when the players execute it correctly of course.

I guess Mike Babcock must be an inferior coach too.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:20 am 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
powerplayer wrote:
HelloMyKneeGrows wrote:
powerplayer wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
I wanted McCormick or Cowan up specifically to injure Rask.


Wow.

Well you certainly won't object I'm sure to, say, Lucic or Boychuck injuring Miller...if that's the way the game is to be played?

Great, we'll see Lalime vs. Thomas.

At least all the scorng will be more entertaining.


This man apparently doesn't get/like sarcasm



I generally bask in sarcasm, but forgive me if I took your comment seriously. There are some around here who would mean such a statement, so your comment didn't strike me as especially out-of-the-norm.

You took my comment exactly as it was intended to be taken - 100% seriously. A team of unremitting goonery will not hear a message unless it is delivered on their level. They take out our biggest weapon, we take out theirs.

When Kaleta held up instead of destroying Rask a la Gomez and Miller, I felt pride that he didn't cross that line...but then I was remiss that the Sabres have no one with a ruthless-enough mentality to do it.

However, and I want this to be perfectly clear, I am not the kind of person to advocate head-hunting of the highest degree on a regular basis. This series has me in a particularly-bloodthirsty mood.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
AudSabres
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:22 am 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:35 pm
Posts: 4998
Location: In your head, producing very weird thoughts.
mechaphil wrote:
I wanted McCormick or Cowan up specifically to injure Rask. Who gives a shit about a career AHL enforcer.


This.

Or at least to get some kind of worthy traffic infront of their goalie.

As for the topic? Why can't we handle boston?

We're not big enough. Plain and simple.

Losing puck battles, corner battles, front of the net battles plus the fact that the guy's we send to the front are small, (EG: Roy Ennis etc...) It's just not going to work. Unless guys start to wake up and start playing the game with the same anger as they did in the last few minutes of this game, we're done in 6 tops but I wouldn't be shocked to see us joining the Laffs on the greens in 5.

_________________
If it's a tight squeeze, spit on it! - NyI

He's a middling AHL player who had the good fortune of a drunk arbitrator. - The Squanto re: Tim Kennedy


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:23 am 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
Squanto wrote:
That same 'stupid drop pass' at the blue line is the method of zone entry most credited to Mike Babcock from the Wings, and is being used throughout the league on a regular basis. It's actually a quite effective way of getting into the zone when the defense stacks 4 across at the line, when the players execute it correctly of course.

I guess Mike Babcock must be an inferior coach too.

Hasn't been working for us too much against the Bruins.

I'd rather see them go in with a head full of steam dump at redline and go charging in.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:29 am 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
It's all execution.

The point of the play is to get the 4 PKers to stop and react to the drop pass, trying to keep their gaps smaller. When you do that, the person receiving the pass can continue to use their momentum to skate around the flat footed PKers, OR shoot it in and have the forwards use their forward momentum to do the same, and get puck possession quicker.

The Sabres don't execute it anywhere close to correctly. They do the drop pass even when challenged by a forechecker, which blows the play up, or they do it too late, causing the forwards to have to stop to stay onside, negating that advantage.

In short, they're doing it wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:30 am 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Squanto wrote:
It's all execution.

The point of the play is to get the 4 PKers to stop and react to the drop pass, trying to keep their gaps smaller. When you do that, the person receiving the pass can continue to use their momentum to skate around the flat footed PKers, OR shoot it in and have the forwards use their forward momentum to do the same, and get puck possession quicker.

The Sabres don't execute it anywhere close to correctly. They do the drop pass even when challenged by a forechecker, which blows the play up, or they do it too late, causing the forwards to have to stop to stay onside, negating that advantage.

In short, they're doing it wrong.

Wait...wait...wait...hold on...oh, here it is (Thank you, ThinkGeek)...
Image

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
AudSabres
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:32 am 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:35 pm
Posts: 4998
Location: In your head, producing very weird thoughts.
mechaphil wrote:
Squanto wrote:
It's all execution.

The point of the play is to get the 4 PKers to stop and react to the drop pass, trying to keep their gaps smaller. When you do that, the person receiving the pass can continue to use their momentum to skate around the flat footed PKers, OR shoot it in and have the forwards use their forward momentum to do the same, and get puck possession quicker.

The Sabres don't execute it anywhere close to correctly. They do the drop pass even when challenged by a forechecker, which blows the play up, or they do it too late, causing the forwards to have to stop to stay onside, negating that advantage.

In short, they're doing it wrong.

Wait...wait...wait...hold on...oh, here it is (Thank you, ThinkGeek)...
Image



/Thread :lol: Phil with the undisputed WIN!

_________________
If it's a tight squeeze, spit on it! - NyI

He's a middling AHL player who had the good fortune of a drunk arbitrator. - The Squanto re: Tim Kennedy


Top
 Profile  
 
powerplayer
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:18 am 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:01 pm
Posts: 866
Bucky Gleason sure had some forceful comments about last night's game:

"Understand, the issue wasn't effort Monday. The Sabres played hard. They simply weren't good enough against a better, tougher team with more experience. It's not a crime so much as the cold truth."


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:27 am 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
powerplayer wrote:
Bucky Gleason sure had some forceful comments about last night's game:

"Understand, the issue wasn't effort Monday. The Sabres played hard. They simply weren't good enough against a better, tougher team with more experience. It's not a crime so much as the cold truth."

Bucky Gleason is, and always has been, a writer that stirs controversy. He's a bit of a douche, and has shown time after time he doesn't really know dick; he echoes opinions of bandwagoners.

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
Jim Bob
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:22 am 
Offline
Penalty Killer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:01 am
Posts: 540
I'm much more worried about the play of the Sabres top two lines than I am about the guys that are supposed to play physical.

The Sabres top two lines were shutout last night and that is why they lost.

Raffi Torres has as many points so far as Connolly, Roy, and Pominville COMBINED.

The Sabres need their best players to be their best players if they are to advance. And with regards to their forwards, that simply isn't happening.

_________________
Sabres Hockey: Commitment to Mediocrity


Top
 Profile  
 
Sabresfansince1980
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:30 am 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 3021
Location: So far away
In a different series against a different team, players like Pominville, Roy, Ennis, and Kennedy would be effective. Against a bigger and more physical team that plays a physical style, in a series in which the whistles are in the refs pocket, those same players are going to disappear.

These guys can't just automatically turn into people that they are not. If Vanek and Hecht were playing, and Connolly and Stafford were healthy this series would be a different story. With a full healthy line-up Buffalo would still be able to overcome the size, physical, and officiating disadvantage.


Top
 Profile  
 
powerplayer
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:19 pm 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:01 pm
Posts: 866
Sabresfansince1980 wrote:
If Vanek and Hecht were playing, and Connolly and Stafford were healthy this series would be a different story.


If he Bruins top player, all-star Marc Savard was healthy, it would be a different series even still.

Sabresfansince1980 wrote:
With a full healthy line-up Buffalo would still be able to overcome the size, physical, and officiating disadvantage.


Without being tied for most injuries in the league this season, Boston probably would've finished higher than 6th in the East.

Just keepin' it real.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:25 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
WHAT OFFICIATING DISADVANTAGE?!

jeez people. im just as upset as the next person, but when push comes to shove, the officials are calling these games evenly. im not going to fabricate excuses to help myself sleep at night. the sabres had 3 powerplays last night, the bruins 2. point the finger elsewhere.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron