Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
powerplayer wrote:
WHY oh WHY does this team have to have it's back up against a wall to play inspired hockey?
Why doesn't "just being in the playoffs" cause them to play with such energy and persistence?
So you didn't see them play all out in game 4 of this series when it was only a 2-1 decision?
You know Game three wasn't too bad either, they weren't playing like total shit and they weren't playing to try and give the ruins as many opportunities to score as possible either.
Game two they were inspired before Vanek went down and the second period at least.
This team is in a goalie battle in this series. They've been playing fine without their leading scorer in Vanek, but it hurts and they still can't play the same way as they did in game 1 without Vanek.
Even Washington has to play a bit different without Ovechkin. I mean this year they didn't rely on him as much because they played differently without him. the years before they played the same way without him and lost most of those games because they relied on him too much.
You're discounting and disclaiming.
What I have seen mostly this series is lots of turnovers, bad decisions lost leads and paid scorers not scoring much at all.
In the first FOUR games, Boston led a combined total of 19 minutes, yet won 3 of the 4. I want you to think about that.
Sorry if my commentary cannot be rosy. If the team is so capable of playing the way they did in game 5, why did they lose a 2-goal lead TWICE in 3 games---against the LOWEST scoring team in the league, no less?
Why not play game 2 like it's game 5 and you're on the brink of elimiantion? Boston seemed to be playing that way since game 2.
If the Sabres end up losing this series, I'd prefer that they go out NOT showing everybody how good they COULD HAVE BEEN. I get no satisfaction from that. That's the attitude of someone who readily accepts pernennial loss(a/k/a there's
always an excuse).
Wouldn't mind a cup sometime, but management has to stop talking themselves into the idea that the core of this team is good enough. It's not, goddammit, it's not.