patkane88 wrote:
Actually you did say 3-0 and not 2-0, thats why I posted my statement from 3-0.
Here's what I said:
"I can't believe ANYBODY would chalk this one up as DONE considering how we JUST SAW a 3-0 series lead evaporate.
Yes, it was courtesy of Philly. HOWEVER, Philly also demonstrated in that series that they themselves are quite capable of dropping 3-in-a-row."
The point I was making was that Philly demonstrated that they can drop as many as 3-in-a-row in a series. They just did it. That's not to imply that they'll have to drop 3-in-a-row for the Habs to win. I was just emphasizing that worse case scenarios have been overcome by the Habs and they're not in as deep a hole yet as they were in the series they just won.
Yes, being down 2-0 is not good, but hardly insurmoutnable, especially by a team that has shown in the last 2 series that they have an ability to kick ass when their back is against the wall.