amyy wrote:
Ennis is small but was, by far, our best player in the playoffs against a physical Boston team...
I don't get why people continually rag on small players. One of the best teams we've had in a long time was full of them. I would take Briere and Drury over some other big players any day.
I think we need to stop getting crappy players just because they're supposedly 'big.' Torres sucks, Rivet hasn't really been all that great either, and Gaustad hasn't done anything lately. The only big player on our team that's better than the smaller guys is Myers...
But other than that, yeah I agree we need to make changes. Darcy needs to sacrifice some players from his beloved 'core' guys and bring in some fresh blood.
And pick a new captain, already.
I agree, I don't think there's anything bad about diminutive players at all, last i checked Martin St Louis has won the MVP, Conn Smythe, and the Stanley Cup and nobody even bothered to draft him because he was "too small". Ideally, you would want a big tough guy driving the net and skilled guys working out of the corners. You don't want to make it too easy for towering NHL defense men to get the puck back and defuse a forecheck. I guess what I'm trying to say is that NOT EVERYBODY on the scoring lines has to be big and tough and out muscle Pronger and Chara all game. One guy per line is enough, so basically the Sabres need 2 forwards that are preferably BIG, mobile, aggressive, and wioth decent enough hands to bang in 15-25 goals.
Knuble
Malone
Hartnell
Bufuglien
and more....
Buffalo could really use one or two forwards in that mold, and MGMT knows it because they have drafted guys that could fill those roles in the near future. As for next season, it's going to take a trade because I just don't see any UFAs that appeal to me.