Oakstream wrote:
Update on Kaleta:
When the NHL was negotiating the last collective bargaining agreement, it made a point of ensuring that teams had the opportunity to take players to salary arbitration.
But teams almost never use club-elected arbitration and this summer is no exception. When the deadline passed for club-elected salary arbitration Tuesday afternoon, the only name on the list was Patrick Kaleta of the Buffalo Sabres.
The 24-year-old right winger had the best offensive season of his career in 2009-10 when he scored 10 goals and 15 points in 55 games to go with 89 penalty minutes. He made $522,500 last season. Over the course of his career, Kaleta has scored 17 goals and 31 points in 153 games.
The arbitration case ensures Kaleta will be under contract next season. He can opt for a one- or two-year award if he does not come to a contract agreement with the Sabres before the decision is handed down, likely sometime in August.
http://www.thehockeynews.com/articles/3 ... -deal.htmlso this is a good thing then right? why wouldn't the sabres just give him a little love... im not a fan of overpaying guys, but i would certainly give him maybe a lil more to keep him around and happy....
so explain this... the club is taking him to the arbitrator ... which means he is defiantly on the 2010/11 roster...
if he does not come to terms before the award from arbitration ... he can accept the arbitrators decision on a one or two year deal... do i have that right? that doesn't sound like a bad deal? what happens in the event of an offer sheet on him or does this take him off of that list? and i wonder why more teams dont use this?
_________________
Belief - Commitment - Character - Discipline - Trust
E X C E L L E N C E