It is currently Sat May 30, 2026 1:34 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
SABRESAllTheWay
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:09 am 
Offline
MegaDouche
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:41 am
Posts: 2752
Location: Fairfax, VA
NYIntensity wrote:
Maybe he's dead in a pile of coke

:clap:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
X-pensfan
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:16 am 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:31 am
Posts: 3668
Location: Pittsburgh
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
Who cares, it's only annoying when everybody whines about it. He can wait until 3 months into next season to sign for all I care. Nobody is putting a gun up to the managers, players, and agents heads to wait for him or anybody else. They are choosing to do so.


Other free agents are holding out because they know their value will go up once Kovalchuk is signed.

Therefore, the whole NHL is frozen during the hottest time of year.


Well then they can wait until 3 months into next season too. It doesn't bother me.

_________________
"I love that you know how to do that." Cheryl/Carol/Crystal

"And I love that I have an erection that doesn't involve homeless people." Kreiger


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:49 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
HelloMyKneeGrows wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Fuck you Kovalchuk. You are not worthy of getting more money than Ovechkin or Crosby or Malkin.

I don't see you leading the league in scoring and goals year in and year out, why do you deserve more then the guys who are?

There is no D in Kovalchuk anyways.


I hate to admit it but Bulldog made a good point yesterday.....

For 45-50 goals a season and a HUGE PP QB/Specialist....I dont care if you dont play defense. We have other guys for that. Give me 50 goals and Im cool. Not every forwards job is to play D just like not every D mans job is to contribute offensively. Thats why one is a SCORER and the other plays DEFENSE...



+/- ratings aren't always perfect, but when a guy is consistently in double digits negative, you know something isn't right.



thats not all on him, atlanta has never been a defense first team. and just as well, his line mates dont play defense either.

and it should be noted that ilya was a + player last season for the thrashers. he may not play great defense, but kovalchuk would help any and all teams. and maybe hes not worth 10 million a season, but 8? yeah, that kind of scoring spreads to other lines as well.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:25 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
HelloMyKneeGrows wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Fuck you Kovalchuk. You are not worthy of getting more money than Ovechkin or Crosby or Malkin.

I don't see you leading the league in scoring and goals year in and year out, why do you deserve more then the guys who are?

There is no D in Kovalchuk anyways.


I hate to admit it but Bulldog made a good point yesterday.....

For 45-50 goals a season and a HUGE PP QB/Specialist....I dont care if you dont play defense. We have other guys for that. Give me 50 goals and Im cool. Not every forwards job is to play D just like not every D mans job is to contribute offensively. Thats why one is a SCORER and the other plays DEFENSE...



+/- ratings aren't always perfect, but when a guy is consistently in double digits negative, you know something isn't right.



thats not all on him, atlanta has never been a defense first team. and just as well, his line mates dont play defense either.

and it should be noted that ilya was a + player last season for the thrashers. he may not play great defense, but kovalchuk would help any and all teams. and maybe hes not worth 10 million a season, but 8? yeah, that kind of scoring spreads to other lines as well.


The guy couldn't even get back to Patrick Elias when he texted him. Not even an acknowledgement.

That's all I need to know about this guy.

And that's no argument against his +/-. There are other guys who had the same +/- rating as he did, and scored half or less the goals that he did.

http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/leagues/ ... 02008.html

He's a bum. Plain and simple.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Last edited by PuckSniperPensel on Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:26 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
HelloMyKneeGrows wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
Fuck you Kovalchuk. You are not worthy of getting more money than Ovechkin or Crosby or Malkin.

I don't see you leading the league in scoring and goals year in and year out, why do you deserve more then the guys who are?

There is no D in Kovalchuk anyways.


I hate to admit it but Bulldog made a good point yesterday.....

For 45-50 goals a season and a HUGE PP QB/Specialist....I dont care if you dont play defense. We have other guys for that. Give me 50 goals and Im cool. Not every forwards job is to play D just like not every D mans job is to contribute offensively. Thats why one is a SCORER and the other plays DEFENSE...


+/- ratings aren't always perfect, but when a guy is consistently in double digits negative, you know something isn't right.



thats not all on him, atlanta has never been a defense first team. and just as well, his line mates dont play defense either.

and it should be noted that ilya was a + player last season for the thrashers. he may not play great defense, but kovalchuk would help any and all teams. and maybe hes not worth 10 million a season, but 8? yeah, that kind of scoring spreads to other lines as well.


and even more of a plus player with the devils. I still don't think it'd be worth it though.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:30 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
Here's an example of plenty of Thrasher's being in the + column, and Kovalchuk sucking wind at the bottom of the standings, even with all the production:

http://hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/leagues/ ... 02009.html

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:48 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
yeah, the atlanta team he has played for isnt exactly prime beef. the top 6 in atlanta were - minus players, and the bottom 6 were plus players. thats not exactly a rarity on bad teams. kovie doesnt play defense that well, but if he were on a good team, he would be a plus player, year in, year out. so that, again, doesnt encapsulate him individually. its a team sport, and him having a bad +/- doesnt mean, hey, its ALL his fault.

and remember, a ton of his production comes from the power play, where that doesnt alter your +/- (unless you give up a shortie)... id also like to point out atlantas decent but not great goaltending. that hurts too.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
Kovalchuk, as he is, isn't worth more than a 6 million dollar cap hit.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
HelloMyKneeGrows
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 2:50 pm 
Offline
Garbage Man
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:41 pm
Posts: 929
Location: Greece, NY
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Kovalchuk, as he is, isn't worth more than a 6 million dollar cap hit.


You wouldn't trade Vanek's 35 goals and 60-65 points a season at $7 million for Kovalchuk's 50 goals and 95 points for the same contract?

_________________
"I can't really hear what Jeremy says, because I got my two Stanley Cup Rings plugging my ears...." -Patrick Roy in reference to Jeremy Roenick's trash talking


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 2:53 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
HelloMyKneeGrows wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Kovalchuk, as he is, isn't worth more than a 6 million dollar cap hit.


You wouldn't trade Vanek's 35 goals and 60-65 points a season at $7 million for Kovalchuk's 50 goals and 95 points for the same contract?


Did I justify Vanek's contract anywhere?

On a side note... anyone else notice that Daniel Briere led the NHL this year in playoff points?

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
daz28
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:19 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 3363
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
HelloMyKneeGrows wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Kovalchuk, as he is, isn't worth more than a 6 million dollar cap hit.


You wouldn't trade Vanek's 35 goals and 60-65 points a season at $7 million for Kovalchuk's 50 goals and 95 points for the same contract?


Did I justify Vanek's contract anywhere?

On a side note... anyone else notice that Daniel Briere led the NHL this year in playoff points?

Just for shits and giggles, what do you think Vanek is worth if Kovy isn't worth 6?


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:32 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
daz28 wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
HelloMyKneeGrows wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Kovalchuk, as he is, isn't worth more than a 6 million dollar cap hit.


You wouldn't trade Vanek's 35 goals and 60-65 points a season at $7 million for Kovalchuk's 50 goals and 95 points for the same contract?


Did I justify Vanek's contract anywhere?

On a side note... anyone else notice that Daniel Briere led the NHL this year in playoff points?

Just for shits and giggles, what do you think Vanek is worth if Kovy isn't worth 6?


I said Kovy isn't worth MORE than 6.

You do realize that if he gets injured after being paid 10 million per, that 1/5th of his team's salary cap is tied, right?

I'd be happy with Vanek earning what Miller's earning.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:45 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
well, if you like vanek at 6, certainly you cant justify pominville at 5.

kovie is fine, hes an offensive dynamo, and a game changer. him at 7 or even 8? id take it. hes probably not the best defensive player, or best locker room guy, but its hard to put a price on that type of talent.

and his goal production dropped off in new jersey, but he was still over a point a game player.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:48 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
The fact that there are only two teams in the NHL willing to seriously talk to him says it all to me.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:48 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Paying Kovie is fine. Paying him close to $10m is fine. Paying him for 10 years seems much, and that's what he wants.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:01 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
i bet every team wants kovie. but not for 10 years. many dont have that cap space. i highly doubt its anything personal.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:03 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
You guys know why he hasn't signed anywhere yet? He wants a high first year salary with little to no bonuses and then a low second year salary with high bonuses so he still makes a fuck-ton of money in case there's another lockout (salaries don't get paid during a lockout, but bonuses do) and NO ONE wants to bow to those demands.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:05 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
cant blame him for that. look at the NFL. they are fucked if there is a lockout, which, all signs point to lockout (many NFL teams are already in "lockout mode."

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 2:10 am 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
To me a 10 million dollar player is a player who can score 100 points a year, contribute on the PP and can play the PK.

I would love Kovalchuk for 7 million max, he is not a player I think deserves a 10 million a year salary. He is a guy you can put the team on, but he needs to play all ends of the ice to justify a contract like that. An he needs to lead the league in more categories then what being one of the worst +/-players in the last ten years.

You need more than 4 seconds of average PK time a game. I guess he is a scorer, but Stamkos got 51 goals this year, all while being able to play 1:20 of PK TOI a game too. Even Crosby played :53 seconds a game average.

Kovalchuk is a great player, but not 10 million dollars great.

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 2:11 am 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
That PK TOI stat about Stamkos impresses me a lot.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: