It is currently Fri May 29, 2026 11:59 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 364 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
Author Message
BlueandYellow
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:19 pm 
Offline
Hart Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 9770
Location: Buffalo, NY
Quote:
Yeah, it's not the situation I would have chose for the team. But Stafford is already under contract. If he doesn't shut up and nut up next season there will be no way for MGMT to keep faith in him and he will be moved. But is Kennedy an upgrade over Stafford in a scoring line role? Maybe his overall game is better but I think Stafford still has more scoring potential.


By the way, sorry about coming off as an asshole, just really frustrated at this whole situation.

See, getting rid of Stafford for Kennedy, is not that bad. Sacrificing laziness for grittiness.

_________________
"Counting all the assholes in the room, I'm definitely not alone!" ~ Michael Poulsen, Volbeat, Still Standing.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:19 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
X-pensfan wrote:
Big-ass quote pyramid

Stafford scored 16+20 last season while mostly playing with Vanek & Roy, two players known for offensive production. Kennedy scored 10+16 while playing mostly with Grier & Goose, two players not nearly known for anything called "consistent scoring". Clearly Stafford has more scoring potential.

Your logic of keeping Stafford over Kennedy is a failure.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:21 pm 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
X-pensfan wrote:
BlueandYellow wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
sabresindc wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
Okay, well. I just listened to the entire press conference and here are my thoughts on the matter.

1. While playing on NHL ice, nobody cares where you grew up. I know how it feels, because I am a Ryan Malone fan from Pittsburgh. But look at the team on the ice for what it is. Calm your emotions and just pretend everybody on the team is from your back yard. Not your city, but literally your back yard. Or if you don't have a yard, the nearest patch of grass (10'x10') will do. Then, base your opinion of the team as a whole without Kennedy on it. With all due respect to him, he is not blessed with the physical attributes needed to thrive as a checking line winger in the NHL and his skill level is half that of an Ennis. I love his heart and feistiness, I really do. And I wish he was on the team with that 2-way contract that was offered him. But he's not, and I wish him well.

2. The team has a self proposed cap. Not a hard cap mind you, but for whatever reasons MGMT are NOT spending to the NHL cap ceiling this summer. Could be that there isn't anybody worth spending that kind of money on this summer. Could be that they need to cut back a little now, so they can spend more later. Could be that they are preparing for Myers gigantic contract extension next year or the year after. Could be that they are bracing for a trade at the deadline. Speculate away.

3. Regier did right by the team. He sacrificed from a position of abundance, and lets face it the Sabres have a lot of REALLY good wingers of all ages on the team. So that he could strengthen a weakness on the team. A defense man that will protect the teams most important asset, pick up a great deal of the slack left behind from Lydman, and continue to provide the team with better size for those long grueling playoffs runs that we all want to happen VERY soon. And he's only 27, probably a better catch then Sutton due to his discipline and durability. And he's not a douche either, I don't like Sutton.


Finally, I think Sabres MGMT once again conducted themselves in a professional, compassionate manner and DR in particular has said all the right things once again.

Very good points but I must respectfully disagree with some of your thoughts. When was the last time the Sabres spend a crap load on any player (oh yeah, we do have a 50 million dollar man who is WELL WORTH that kind of money :doh: ), let alone make a big trade. Really good wingers???? Seriously??? Who are these "really good wingers," and where were they last season.

Yes, we have a pretty solid defense now but how about some scoring? You need to be able to score in order to win and I don't see it. Unless someone lights a fire under these forwards asses, you can keep dreaming about a championship.


Again, sorry about the rant.....just trying to vent a little.



I whole heartedly agree that the primary need for this team after last season was a big. scoring forward. Not just BIG as in game breaking potential but physically as well and preferably a center that would replace Connolly ASAP. But where are they? There's nobody out there I would want to lock up to a long term deal and there wasn't earlier either. The only way left is to draft (Kassian is waiting in the wings-sick pun fully intended) the guy, wait until next summer, or trade. They retain the cap flexibility to trade later on and I would like to think that they have the depth, and the resources to pull off a big move down the line.

Vanek has had a bad run as of late. He has not been worth the big contract over the past couple of seasons. But he is without a doubt one of the brightest young wingers in the game of hockey. He's a 40 goal scorer, look around the league and tell me how many wingers could score 40 next season. I don't want to over hype Ennis based off of a 10 game snippet but I see no reason to doubt his ability to put up 50^ points next season as a rookie. Pominville has 70^ point talent. They have great checking line wingers, the role in which Kennedy was asked to play. And then there are a few other guys with 50 point potential including Staffard.

I wouldn't say that the Sabres have a top 5 collection of wingers (from 1-8), but top 10 for sure.

Will Kennedy's offense be missed? No. It will be improved upon, by Ennis. And they retain roster flexibility for other young forwards who may be riding an AHL hot streak while an NHL player is rather cold.

Building a Stanley Cup champion is real tough to do especially while maintaining a good team in the process. But that's what they are doing, and recent events suggest top me that they are heading the right way.


THEY'VE BEEN BUILDING FOR 40 FREAKIN' YEARS.


Yeah, well it aint easy. Might be another 40 years. The way I see it I have two choices. Enjoy the journey and view things with a bigger picture in mind, or freak out and become impatient anytime something is too difficult or complex to understand right away.

I honestly thought the ultimate goal for any sports team is to win the prize. With what the sabres are doing, the self-imposed cap crap, proves that the only goal they have is to string their fans along with mediocrity.

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
X-pensfan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:28 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:31 am
Posts: 3668
Location: Pittsburgh
mechaphil wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
Squanto wrote:
My consternation has never, for one instant, had anything to do with Kennedy being from South Buffalo. It's completely been about the fact that they're buying out a good young player to save a couple hundred thousand bucks. With Morissonn's contract in, and Kennedy out, they have $5.4M in cap room. They could have kept Kennedy at $1M, signed Morrissonn, and STILL been $4.57M under the line. So, they basically made themselves look like a bunch of cheap bastards because LQ wouldn't authorize another $833k.

If they wouldn't spend that money on one of their own players, why should anyone expect that they would ever spend it on someone else down the line?



Well, they aren't going to send Ennis down through waivers. So who do you think was eventually going to need to get bumped down? Kennedy. If he had a ONE WAY deal they would have had to have eaten more of the contract later and looked-to your eyes-as even bigger douches then.

So by your logic, the kid with heart and a penchant for kicking the shit out of his second season (it's statistically proven) is a better candidate for removal than the talented but lazy winger who's proven for three years that he's a bust?

And he did get a one-way deal. If he got a two-way deal, they would have just demoted him to Portland.


Not a BETTER candidate but the only one of the two that could be sacrificed at the time. They wanted Kennedy to take a 2-way deal. Would they rather fire up a time machine and go back and make Staffords deal two-way so they could sign Kennedy too a 1-way deal now? Sure! I think MGMT would love to have both players on 2-way deals as a matter of fact. But, business is business. They are either stuck with Stafford or still hoping he will find his game.

Why are you so immune to the idea of buying out Stafford? This doesn't have to do with one-way deals or two-way deals, this has to do with the (faulty) logic that Ennis getting his spot on the team was facilitated by buying out a kid making chump change who has talent and heart and busts his ass instead of buying out the three-year bust.


I suppose they could have bought him out for 950k, and paid Kennedy 1 million. I mean, if I had to go to war with one of them it would be Kennedy. But at the risk of completely alienating myself let's look at some facts. One of them has NHL size. They are both 24. One has put up 45 points in an NHL season and one has put up 25 points.

Let's give Stafford one more season. He's never going to play with the heart of a lion, but he has the ability to accent a scoring line. Kennedy doesn't.

_________________
"I love that you know how to do that." Cheryl/Carol/Crystal

"And I love that I have an erection that doesn't involve homeless people." Kreiger


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:31 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
X-pensfan wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
Squanto wrote:
My consternation has never, for one instant, had anything to do with Kennedy being from South Buffalo. It's completely been about the fact that they're buying out a good young player to save a couple hundred thousand bucks. With Morissonn's contract in, and Kennedy out, they have $5.4M in cap room. They could have kept Kennedy at $1M, signed Morrissonn, and STILL been $4.57M under the line. So, they basically made themselves look like a bunch of cheap bastards because LQ wouldn't authorize another $833k.

If they wouldn't spend that money on one of their own players, why should anyone expect that they would ever spend it on someone else down the line?



Well, they aren't going to send Ennis down through waivers. So who do you think was eventually going to need to get bumped down? Kennedy. If he had a ONE WAY deal they would have had to have eaten more of the contract later and looked-to your eyes-as even bigger douches then.

So by your logic, the kid with heart and a penchant for kicking the shit out of his second season (it's statistically proven) is a better candidate for removal than the talented but lazy winger who's proven for three years that he's a bust?

And he did get a one-way deal. If he got a two-way deal, they would have just demoted him to Portland.


Not a BETTER candidate but the only one of the two that could be sacrificed at the time. They wanted Kennedy to take a 2-way deal. Would they rather fire up a time machine and go back and make Staffords deal two-way so they could sign Kennedy too a 1-way deal now? Sure! I think MGMT would love to have both players on 2-way deals as a matter of fact. But, business is business. They are either stuck with Stafford or still hoping he will find his game.

Why are you so immune to the idea of buying out Stafford? This doesn't have to do with one-way deals or two-way deals, this has to do with the (faulty) logic that Ennis getting his spot on the team was facilitated by buying out a kid making chump change who has talent and heart and busts his ass instead of buying out the three-year bust.


I suppose they could have bought him out for 950k, and paid Kennedy 1 million. I mean, if I had to go to war with one of them it would be Kennedy. But at the risk of completely alienating myself let's look at some facts. One of them has NHL size. They are both 24. One has put up 45 points in an NHL season and one has put up 25 points.

Let's give Stafford one more season. He's never going to play with the heart of a lion, but he has the ability to accent a scoring line. Kennedy doesn't.

Stats don't tell the story here. You haven't watched Drew Stafford for four years in depth. You don't see what we see. Not to sound like a douche, but you're new at this (being a Sabres fan) and you don't know everything yet.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
X-pensfan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:32 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:31 am
Posts: 3668
Location: Pittsburgh
sabresindc wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
BlueandYellow wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
sabresindc wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
Okay, well. I just listened to the entire press conference and here are my thoughts on the matter.

1. While playing on NHL ice, nobody cares where you grew up. I know how it feels, because I am a Ryan Malone fan from Pittsburgh. But look at the team on the ice for what it is. Calm your emotions and just pretend everybody on the team is from your back yard. Not your city, but literally your back yard. Or if you don't have a yard, the nearest patch of grass (10'x10') will do. Then, base your opinion of the team as a whole without Kennedy on it. With all due respect to him, he is not blessed with the physical attributes needed to thrive as a checking line winger in the NHL and his skill level is half that of an Ennis. I love his heart and feistiness, I really do. And I wish he was on the team with that 2-way contract that was offered him. But he's not, and I wish him well.

2. The team has a self proposed cap. Not a hard cap mind you, but for whatever reasons MGMT are NOT spending to the NHL cap ceiling this summer. Could be that there isn't anybody worth spending that kind of money on this summer. Could be that they need to cut back a little now, so they can spend more later. Could be that they are preparing for Myers gigantic contract extension next year or the year after. Could be that they are bracing for a trade at the deadline. Speculate away.

3. Regier did right by the team. He sacrificed from a position of abundance, and lets face it the Sabres have a lot of REALLY good wingers of all ages on the team. So that he could strengthen a weakness on the team. A defense man that will protect the teams most important asset, pick up a great deal of the slack left behind from Lydman, and continue to provide the team with better size for those long grueling playoffs runs that we all want to happen VERY soon. And he's only 27, probably a better catch then Sutton due to his discipline and durability. And he's not a douche either, I don't like Sutton.


Finally, I think Sabres MGMT once again conducted themselves in a professional, compassionate manner and DR in particular has said all the right things once again.

Very good points but I must respectfully disagree with some of your thoughts. When was the last time the Sabres spend a crap load on any player (oh yeah, we do have a 50 million dollar man who is WELL WORTH that kind of money :doh: ), let alone make a big trade. Really good wingers???? Seriously??? Who are these "really good wingers," and where were they last season.

Yes, we have a pretty solid defense now but how about some scoring? You need to be able to score in order to win and I don't see it. Unless someone lights a fire under these forwards asses, you can keep dreaming about a championship.


Again, sorry about the rant.....just trying to vent a little.



I whole heartedly agree that the primary need for this team after last season was a big. scoring forward. Not just BIG as in game breaking potential but physically as well and preferably a center that would replace Connolly ASAP. But where are they? There's nobody out there I would want to lock up to a long term deal and there wasn't earlier either. The only way left is to draft (Kassian is waiting in the wings-sick pun fully intended) the guy, wait until next summer, or trade. They retain the cap flexibility to trade later on and I would like to think that they have the depth, and the resources to pull off a big move down the line.

Vanek has had a bad run as of late. He has not been worth the big contract over the past couple of seasons. But he is without a doubt one of the brightest young wingers in the game of hockey. He's a 40 goal scorer, look around the league and tell me how many wingers could score 40 next season. I don't want to over hype Ennis based off of a 10 game snippet but I see no reason to doubt his ability to put up 50^ points next season as a rookie. Pominville has 70^ point talent. They have great checking line wingers, the role in which Kennedy was asked to play. And then there are a few other guys with 50 point potential including Staffard.

I wouldn't say that the Sabres have a top 5 collection of wingers (from 1-8), but top 10 for sure.

Will Kennedy's offense be missed? No. It will be improved upon, by Ennis. And they retain roster flexibility for other young forwards who may be riding an AHL hot streak while an NHL player is rather cold.

Building a Stanley Cup champion is real tough to do especially while maintaining a good team in the process. But that's what they are doing, and recent events suggest top me that they are heading the right way.


THEY'VE BEEN BUILDING FOR 40 FREAKIN' YEARS.


Yeah, well it aint easy. Might be another 40 years. The way I see it I have two choices. Enjoy the journey and view things with a bigger picture in mind, or freak out and become impatient anytime something is too difficult or complex to understand right away.

I honestly thought the ultimate goal for any sports team is to win the prize. With what the sabres are doing, the self-imposed cap crap, proves that the only goal they have is to string their fans along with mediocrity.


Way above mediocracy in the regular season, they just need to find better pieces for the playoff puzzle. Did they let a piece go? No, I suspect that TK was a much bigger inspiration for the fans then the Sabres locker room.

_________________
"I love that you know how to do that." Cheryl/Carol/Crystal

"And I love that I have an erection that doesn't involve homeless people." Kreiger


Top
 Profile  
 
BlueandYellow
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:32 pm 
Offline
Hart Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 9770
Location: Buffalo, NY
Stafford's not exactly Mr. offense, either.

_________________
"Counting all the assholes in the room, I'm definitely not alone!" ~ Michael Poulsen, Volbeat, Still Standing.


Top
 Profile  
 
X-pensfan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:34 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:31 am
Posts: 3668
Location: Pittsburgh
BlueandYellow wrote:
Stafford's not exactly Mr. offense, either.


Nope, but he's put up about 20 more points then TK in a single NHL season. And he's entering a $$$$ year so if he likes those nice things he better try and put up 50 and keep that pace going well into spring.

_________________
"I love that you know how to do that." Cheryl/Carol/Crystal

"And I love that I have an erection that doesn't involve homeless people." Kreiger


Top
 Profile  
 
BlueandYellow
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:34 pm 
Offline
Hart Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 9770
Location: Buffalo, NY
And you had a Stanley cup moment, bro. We never did. It's different for us.

_________________
"Counting all the assholes in the room, I'm definitely not alone!" ~ Michael Poulsen, Volbeat, Still Standing.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:36 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
X-pensfan wrote:
BlueandYellow wrote:
Stafford's not exactly Mr. offense, either.


Nope, but he's put up about 20 more points then TK in a single NHL season. And he's entering a $$$$ year so if he likes those nice things he better try and put up 50 and keep that pace going well into spring.

In Kennedy's single full season, on the third line for 90% of the season, he was barely outscored by 8 points by a guy with 3 full season of NHL experience playing on the top line for 90% of the time. Wow, did Stafford show Kennedy what's up. Oh, and which forward was benched in the playoffs while fully healthy? Wasn't Kennedy.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:38 pm 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
X-pensfan wrote:
Way above mediocracy in the regular season, they just need to find better pieces for the playoff puzzle. Did they let a piece go? No, I suspect that TK was a much bigger inspiration for the fans then the Sabres locker room.

Way above mediocrity, really :? How many 1 goal games did the team win....how many 1-0, 2-1 games were there...Several. The biggest reason why the team did so well last season was Miller and Miller alone. You can't tell me that if we didn't have Miller that the Sabres would have seen the post season

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
BlueandYellow
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:41 pm 
Offline
Hart Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 9770
Location: Buffalo, NY
sabresindc wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
Way above mediocracy in the regular season, they just need to find better pieces for the playoff puzzle. Did they let a piece go? No, I suspect that TK was a much bigger inspiration for the fans then the Sabres locker room.

Way above mediocrity, really :? How many 1 goal games did the team win....how many 1-0, 2-1 games were there...Several. The biggest reason why the team did so well last season was Miller and Miller alone. You can't tell me that if we didn't have Miller that the Sabres would have seen the post season


Yeah. I mean, every team needs a decent goalie to make it. But, it's not enough to WIN IT ALL. We have decent defense, the best goaltending in the league, and we have a MEDIOCRE OFFENSE.

_________________
"Counting all the assholes in the room, I'm definitely not alone!" ~ Michael Poulsen, Volbeat, Still Standing.


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:42 pm 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
BlueandYellow wrote:
sabresindc wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
Way above mediocracy in the regular season, they just need to find better pieces for the playoff puzzle. Did they let a piece go? No, I suspect that TK was a much bigger inspiration for the fans then the Sabres locker room.

Way above mediocrity, really :? How many 1 goal games did the team win....how many 1-0, 2-1 games were there...Several. The biggest reason why the team did so well last season was Miller and Miller alone. You can't tell me that if we didn't have Miller that the Sabres would have seen the post season


Yeah. I mean, every team needs a decent goalie to make it. But, it's not enough to WIN IT ALL. We have decent defense, the best goaltending in the league, and we have a MEDIOCRE OFFENSE.

EXACTLY, that's my point!

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
X-pensfan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:43 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:31 am
Posts: 3668
Location: Pittsburgh
mechaphil wrote:
Stats don't tell the story here. You haven't watched Drew Stafford for four years in depth. You don't see what we see. Not to sound like a douche, but you're new at this (being a Sabres fan) and you don't know everything yet.


You're absolutely right. I'm looking at this almost indifferently because I haven't invested the time emotionally to this particular team. But believe me. I know what it's like to watch your favorite hockey team play like crap for years and years. I know what being on the wrong end of salary dumps feels like. I know what it's all about when your favorite players are ripped away because of the business of the NHL. And I know all about self imposed caps and ownership that can't or wont spend the money to win.

While you guys have my sympathies, I have to maintain that this isn't the end of the world. And from a business and a hockey point of view I think it could turn out to be the best choice for the team. The cap era is a pain in the dick, but this isn't Wayne Gretzky despite the similar stature.

_________________
"I love that you know how to do that." Cheryl/Carol/Crystal

"And I love that I have an erection that doesn't involve homeless people." Kreiger


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:44 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
BlueandYellow wrote:
Yeah. I mean, every team needs a decent goalie to make it. But, it's not enough to WIN IT ALL. We have decent defense, the best goaltending in the league, and we have a MEDIOCRE OFFENSE.


According to some twatfaces on the Sabres Facebook page, all you need is a good offense and a snowman for a goalie, and you're guaranteed a conference final. :p


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:44 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
No, keeping Stafford instead of Kennedy is not the best choice this team could've made.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
BlueandYellow
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:45 pm 
Offline
Hart Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 pm
Posts: 9770
Location: Buffalo, NY
:obscene-hanged:

_________________
"Counting all the assholes in the room, I'm definitely not alone!" ~ Michael Poulsen, Volbeat, Still Standing.


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:46 pm 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
X-pensfan.....I apologize if it seems like we're ganging up on you, we're not purposely trying. We're just frustrated and you're the glass half full kind of person and some of use are tired of seeing it that way for years and no one ever fills the damn glass :bang: :sad-roulette:

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Last edited by sabresindc on Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
X-pensfan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:47 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:31 am
Posts: 3668
Location: Pittsburgh
mechaphil wrote:
X-pensfan wrote:
BlueandYellow wrote:
Stafford's not exactly Mr. offense, either.


Nope, but he's put up about 20 more points then TK in a single NHL season. And he's entering a $$$$ year so if he likes those nice things he better try and put up 50 and keep that pace going well into spring.

In Kennedy's single full season, on the third line for 90% of the season, he was barely outscored by 8 points by a guy with 3 full season of NHL experience playing on the top line for 90% of the time. Wow, did Stafford show Kennedy what's up. Oh, and which forward was benched in the playoffs while fully healthy? Wasn't Kennedy.


It could be that was the BEST Kennedy had to offer and the worst Stafford had. Next season is a fresh slate for both of them. Let's see what TK does for his new team and what Stafford does for the Sabres. Like most hockey disagreements, they linger for YEARS. lol

_________________
"I love that you know how to do that." Cheryl/Carol/Crystal

"And I love that I have an erection that doesn't involve homeless people." Kreiger


Top
 Profile  
 
X-pensfan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:48 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:31 am
Posts: 3668
Location: Pittsburgh
sabresindc wrote:
X-pensfan.....I apologize if it seems like we're ganging up on you, we're not purposely trying. We're just frustrated and you're the glass half full kind of person and some of use are tired of seeing it that way for years and no one ever fills the damn glass :bang:


I didn't stir up this hornets nest of passionate fans pissed off because a local boy done good who just happens to share that same passion for hockey was axed without warning. But I am certainly caught in it! lol

Time for me to get some diner.... :whistle:

_________________
"I love that you know how to do that." Cheryl/Carol/Crystal

"And I love that I have an erection that doesn't involve homeless people." Kreiger


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 364 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron