It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 7:09 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
gr8daygo
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:08 am 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 2265
i know i posted this in the Tampa post game thread.... but I want some more action on it, lol... give me some thoughts... What do you see?

My questions... seriously now....

1 - Do we agree it is time for Timmy to move on? Clearly making more fuck-ups than being productive... Contract ends at the end of the year so he should be moved between now and the trade dead line. Again, Im a huge Timmy homer, but his play has been extremely sub par, especially on the PP... IF Timmy is moved, can Ennis or Gerbe man the 2nd line C? Do you move Goose up until next year when Adam might be ready? Or do we really ride Timmy out?

2- Stafford. Its no secret we started winning once Staff got hurt. I don't like him in the top 6... do you give him another chance? Where do you stick him? Or would you try and move him and keep Ellis up?

3- Rivet, should he be starting any more? I understand he is the captain. And You dont want to send your captain packing. But hasn't Butler looked better? I like the D and depth on the D, so I don't want to really move anyone there. I think D depth is key for a play off run... the question is should Craig be a healthy scratch until an injury occurs?

I do like what I have seen out of the team recently. Roy and TV are on a mission... its great to get those guys going... But i still think there needs to be a little tinkering... Yes, they have shown they can skate with anyone... But the recurring Tim Connley Turn Over Show needs to stop! I just don't think Rivet can keep up any more. And I like how this team plays with out Stafford, so why should he be given yet ANOTHER chance?

_________________
Belief - Commitment - Character - Discipline - Trust

E X C E L L E N C E


Top
 Profile  
 
X-pensfan
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:46 am 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:31 am
Posts: 3668
Location: Pittsburgh
1. Yes. I favor US hockey players and players that make through US hockey training, and he is incredibly talented. So he doesn't really have to do much for me to root for him, but I can't even find a reason to keep him on the team, he's that bad! Ennis could not do worse running the second line. Connolly is not going to be a Sabre next season, so trade him at the deadline when he could have some value to a playoff team that is decimated by injuries.

2. See above. Stafford will be replacef by Kassian next season, so try to move him for an older more talented rental winger from a younger non-playoff team.

3. Butler is better in every aspect of the game. Rivet makes for good depth though, so I would keep him unless Weber is playing at an epic level. In that case send him to a contender looking for depth like the Nucks.



Don't move anybody until the deadline, so let's stop bitching and make these player look good to lazy scouts who read message boards!!

_________________
"I love that you know how to do that." Cheryl/Carol/Crystal

"And I love that I have an erection that doesn't involve homeless people." Kreiger


Top
 Profile  
 
gr8daygo
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:51 am 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 2265
X-pensfan wrote:
1. Yes. I favor US hockey players and players that make through US hockey training, and he is incredibly talented. So he doesn't really have to do much for me to root for him, but I can't even find a reason to keep him on the team, he's that bad! Ennis could not do worse running the second line. Connolly is not going to be a Sabre next season, so trade him at the deadline when he could have some value to a playoff team that is decimated by injuries.

2. See above. Stafford will be replacef by Kassian next season, so try to move him for an older more talented rental winger from a younger non-playoff team.

3. Butler is better in every aspect of the game. Rivet makes for good depth though, so I would keep him unless Weber is playing at an epic level. In that case send him to a contender looking for depth like the Nucks.



Don't move anybody until the deadline, so let's stop bitching and make these player look good to lazy scouts who read message boards!!


Not sure the boards can help Timmy in any way.... his play certainly doesn't help him... we need one of those epic Darcy fleecing's we haven't seen in some time... come on Darcy, you have one more fleece job in ya... fuck Quinn... get it done... well by the deadline at least...

_________________
Belief - Commitment - Character - Discipline - Trust

E X C E L L E N C E


Top
 Profile  
 
Sabretooth
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:58 am 
Offline
Garbage Man

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 10:52 am
Posts: 1122
All three are good as gone by season's end.

Connolly should have been moved already. Why we keep him around for no reason is up to a higher authority. He still has some trade value.

Stafford, same situation as Connolly, but younger. He cannot dig in and perform at the level he needs to. He needs a change in scenery via trade.

Rivet may stay around until the season's end, then test out as an UFA for the first time.

_________________
Let's go Buffalo!


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 12:56 pm 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
Connolly WILL NOT be traded, that's a lock. They will end the season with him but let him walk without offering him a new contract. He has absolutely no trade value at all with his play this year. Most players excel when free agency is approaching, but not Timmy. He'll be lucky to have a team match his $4.5 million the Sabres are paying him now.

Do you honestly believe that Stafford is THE player who prevented this team from winning????? I don't see his replacement scoring. The players who are scoring are the ones who would be out there if Stafford was in the line up....Pure coincidence.

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
freshtracks
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:05 pm 
Offline
Rink Rat

Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:49 pm
Posts: 27
1. In a perfect world, Connolly would be re-signed for $2M per year or less to center the 3rd line and 2nd PP unit. In the real world, Timmy will finish the year, have maybe one hot month, and then be let go. He will probably reject a lot of low-ball free agent offers at first, then will be forced to accept an even lower one because he waited too long.

2. Stafford is showing (limited) signs of his potential this year. With the way Vanek and Roy have been playing, Stafford could do very well if he gets put back on their line. Either way, the $13.5M 2nd line has been doing jack lately and needs to get blown up, but I doubt Stafford is the guy to make the difference. So I don't know what you do with him, except be thankful he's not costing the team a huge contract.

3. Poor Craig Rivet. It's looking like the post-surgery resurgence we had all hoped for is just not happening for him, but I still feel he's an asset to the team and it would be a waste to stuff him in the press box all season. Maybe there's a spot for him on the coaching staff?


Top
 Profile  
 
gr8daygo
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:07 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 2265
sabresindc wrote:
Connolly WILL NOT be traded, that's a lock. They will end the season with him but let him walk without offering him a new contract. He has absolutely no trade value at all with his play this year. Most players excel when free agency is approaching, but not Timmy. He'll be lucky to have a team match his $4.5 million the Sabres are paying him now.

Do you honestly believe that Stafford is THE player who prevented this team from winning????? I don't see his replacement scoring. The players who are scoring are the ones who would be out there if Stafford was in the line up....Pure coincidence.


Hecht came on very strong when staff was out... Roy Ennis TV also came on while Staffard was out. and ellis seemed to help out the lower lines... I wouldn't call that coincidence. I'd call that getting Ennis where he belongs (Top 6)... and not sure what got into Hecht but he has been playing pretty solid hockey... Id say Stafford being out has helped the chemistry of the team and allowed players to be in better position given their talent....

_________________
Belief - Commitment - Character - Discipline - Trust

E X C E L L E N C E


Top
 Profile  
 
gr8daygo
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:12 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 2265
freshtracks wrote:
1. In a perfect world, Connolly would be re-signed for $2M per year or less to center the 3rd line and 2nd PP unit. In the real world, Timmy will finish the year, have maybe one hot month, and then be let go. He will probably reject a lot of low-ball free agent offers at first, then will be forced to accept an even lower one because he waited too long.

2. Stafford is showing (limited) signs of his potential this year. With the way Vanek and Roy have been playing, Stafford could do very well if he gets put back on their line. Either way, the $13.5M 2nd line has been doing jack lately and needs to get blown up, but I doubt Stafford is the guy to make the difference. So I don't know what you do with him, except be thankful he's not costing the team a huge contract.

3. Poor Craig Rivet. It's looking like the post-surgery resurgence we had all hoped for is just not happening for him, but I still feel he's an asset to the team and it would be a waste to stuff him in the press box all season. Maybe there's a spot for him on the coaching staff?


Please, please keep Stafford away from the top 6... PLEASE at least keep him out of the Top 3... I like what REV have done, why break that up to give Stafford yet another chance to meet his potential...

_________________
Belief - Commitment - Character - Discipline - Trust

E X C E L L E N C E


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:17 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
who is going to take these guys? think we, the fans, are the only people aware these guys are struggling this season?

moving these players would get less of a return then the sabres would want, and you dont get better moving a player just for the sake of moving a player.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
gr8daygo
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:20 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 2265
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
who is going to take these guys? think we, the fans, are the only people aware these guys are struggling this season?

moving these players would get less of a return then the sabres would want, and you dont get better moving a player just for the sake of moving a player.


I think Rivet should stay for the season, I like him for depth on the D....

Timmy i just cant stand seeing the turn over show any more and he'll probably not be offered a contract at the end off the year, so you send him at the dead line or ride him out

Stafford, i just see the team play better with out him, so sit his ass in the press box then...

Do you see the current roster being a cup contender?

_________________
Belief - Commitment - Character - Discipline - Trust

E X C E L L E N C E


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:23 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
no, and the players the sabres could get in return for these 3 arnt going to change that either.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:27 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
If i'm Regier, I pull the trigger to bring in Penner for Stafford and Butler + a pick (2nd rounder, and why not, Darcy gives them away at the deadline anyways).
Edmonton needs a young, stay at home type D man. And Stafford is a good RW addition for them at a reasonable price.

I then trade Connolly and Rivet for draft picks or prospects to who ever will pay the most.
Call up Luke Adam to replace Connolly at Center on line 2 and put Ennis on the LW.

Vanek - Roy - Penner
Ennis - Adam - Pomminville

There you go, shed salary with moving Connolly, Stafford and Rivet, brought in an ELC in Luke Adam and added Penner's 4.25 mil. Its a cost savings for the team and actually puts a better product on the ice IMHO.

Will Regier do this? Of course not, he's in love with his players, but it should be done none the less.

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:32 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Connolly doesn't garner much at the deadline. Maybe a later round pick from a team looking to fill an injury hole. That being said, I'd take anything to get him off the roster. He's just a waste of space. He knows he'll never make this kind of money again, and I really think he's playing not to get hurt.

Nobody takes Rivet. Nobody.


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:36 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
Squanto wrote:
Connolly doesn't garner much at the deadline. Maybe a later round pick from a team looking to fill an injury hole. That being said, I'd take anything to get him off the roster. He's just a waste of space. He knows he'll never make this kind of money again, and I really think he's playing not to get hurt.

Nobody takes Rivet. Nobody.

Probably right about Rivet. But I have to think someone will give something for Connolly, and a later round pick would be in the realm unfortunately.
But ya, getting him off the roster would be a plus at this point and time, he's actually a detrement to the team now.

Sad really, becuase I can see Roy and Vanek really trying to get it done out there, they just need the other lines to chip in on the score sheet in a more regular fashion.

Meh, who knows, I'll keep watching them, they did pull off a little run there for a few games, and ya never know when or if the light switch will go on with this club.

Just out of curiousity, any word on Miller and the time he'll miss?

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:39 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
This is the question I always ask:

If Connolly is such a terrible player for the Sabres (which I think he is), why would another team give up anything to get him?

These other teams watch these games. If fans can see that Connolly is terrible, the professionals surely can.


Top
 Profile  
 
slesh
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:43 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 2419
Location: Driving Ms. Daisy, from behind!
Squanto wrote:
This is the question I always ask:

If Connolly is such a terrible player for the Sabres (which I think he is), why would another team give up anything to get him?

These other teams watch these games. If fans can see that Connolly is terrible, the professionals surely can.

Well, other teams GM's may value him differently than we do.
I keep asking myself why Sutter and Sather still hold GM positions in the NHL. Hehehe.
Can we find someone to take him?
I think we can, I'd rather he go in a package though to grab a player (Penner and Hemsky come to mind obviously due to Edmontons woes).

_________________
Lord Stanley's Cup is what its all about.
Mr. Pegula, your destiny awaits you sir.


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:21 pm 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
gr8daygo wrote:
sabresindc wrote:
Connolly WILL NOT be traded, that's a lock. They will end the season with him but let him walk without offering him a new contract. He has absolutely no trade value at all with his play this year. Most players excel when free agency is approaching, but not Timmy. He'll be lucky to have a team match his $4.5 million the Sabres are paying him now.

Do you honestly believe that Stafford is THE player who prevented this team from winning????? I don't see his replacement scoring. The players who are scoring are the ones who would be out there if Stafford was in the line up....Pure coincidence.


Hecht came on very strong when staff was out... Roy Ennis TV also came on while Staffard was out. and ellis seemed to help out the lower lines... I wouldn't call that coincidence. I'd call that getting Ennis where he belongs (Top 6)... and not sure what got into Hecht but he has been playing pretty solid hockey... Id say Stafford being out has helped the chemistry of the team and allowed players to be in better position given their talent....

Hecht has 2 goals, 3 assists and is a -4 with a 3.2 shooting percentage for the season. I wouldn't say he has "come on very strong." I do concede that Ennis has turned it up a few notches and is playing well in place of Stafford. I just think that since Roy and Vanek are clicking now that if you put Stafford in there he would follow suit. I am probably wrong and he could tank like Connolly but I'd give him the benefit of the doubt. I could see blaming him if his line sucked but just about everyone on the team was horrible before Stafford got hurt. You can not solely blame the whole teams issues on one guy.

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:38 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Stafford has never gotten going when playing with Roy and Vanek, even when those two have been going well.

Nothing leads me to believe that he would start now.


Top
 Profile  
 
sabresindc
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 5:09 pm 
Offline
Captain Clutch
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 6146
Location: Southern most point of Northern Virginia
Squanto wrote:
Stafford has never gotten going when playing with Roy and Vanek, even when those two have been going well.

Nothing leads me to believe that he would start now.

Stafford had 4 goals and 4 assists with a 9.1 shooting percentage in just 14 games. For 14 games I would say that isn't all that bad compared to some others on this team who have played all 22 but have much lower stats. Stafford was streaky in the past but so was Roy. Roy is probably the most consistent player on the team this season when it comes to forwards.

_________________
sabretoothpick wrote:
Yhoshi wrote:
wollt ihr die sabres oben sehen müsst ihr die tabelle drehn.

It's a phrase that basically means, if you wanna see the Sabres at the top, turn the rankings.


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 5:35 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
The thing with Stafford, we all know his shortcomings, but he's probably the best scorer we have behind Vanek and Roy (which is really depressing).

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: