PuckSniperPensel wrote:
powerplayer wrote:
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
I don't think those lines are that bad at all.
Line #2 has ZERO POINTS written all over it.
Line 4 is OK, but Ennis should be on line 1 & Gerbe should be....I don't know
where Gerbe should be. I guess it is time to punish Ennis with few scoring
opportunities. Ennis, you've been a bad boy. You're bannished to line 3.
I can't believe 1/3 of the top line will likely either be Gerbe or Ennis. Nothing against those two, but that really is pathetic. Think the extra room in the salary cap (plus somebody's salary) might've gotten a nice scorer on that 1st line? But hey, what-the-fuck-do-I-know.
Anybody know this Pegula's e-mail address?
Oh wait, maybe it's...
[email protected]You haven't seen them play yet.
What's wrong with Ennis on the top line PP? They've had glorious opportunities in the past.
And our second line, Adam has been trying his hardest to score a goal, and plus if they don't get any points, is it any worse then what we have had on that line?
And the Salary cap didn't go up very much from last year. Yes we have room to add some sort of scorer to the team, but we might be waiting for the deadline to add someone and to make sure we have the room in case they are signed long term, you never know. And when Connolly comes off the books, that frees up 4.5 more million to screw around with giving us almost 9 million to get our team put back together.
And not all top line players are going to score 100 points a year. You will probably have two players over a PPG on a top line throughout the league. You know, I would love to see which teams have a top line with all three of those players over 82 points or a PPG in a given year.
_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.
Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
