Squanto wrote:
SabresFanInNebraska wrote:
Squanto wrote:
SabresFanInNebraska wrote:
Bruins hit more posts, missed more open nets and opportunities than the Sabres bro. The end.
I wasn't aware that 'missed scoring chances' was a tracked statistic. Bro.
You're sensitive. Ask me how I know...
"scoring opportunities" are a tracked statistic. Man.
Sensitive is not a word I would use. Drop your attitude. If you're going to start 'bro'ing people, you're going to catch shit for it.
Individual teams track scoring chances, but the data is not available to the public. Therefore, you have no quantifiable basis to say that one team had more or missed more chances than another.
This is hockey, not a court of law. What I mean is that we both watched the game, as fans. AND the Bruins missed more open nets, hit more posts, whatever what have you. I'll say "in my opinion" I suppose although I don't really think it's up for debate. They put up scoring chances in between periods and after the game so it's not exactly classified info.
Sensitive is not a word I would use? Drop my attitude?
When I originally used the word "bro" I didn't mean any offense by it at all. I'm somewhat new to these forums (I've lurked for a long time) but never before have I witnessed the word "bro"being interpreted as a negative thing, what the fuck? In fact its a positive gesture. The fact that you're offended by me "broing" people is hilarious.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
.jpg)
