I'm sick of responding with this spiel in threads every time it's applicable so here goes...
It's of my opinion that the rules being called much tighter following the end of the lockout combined with Darcy Regier stumbling onto a roster make-up that excelled due to the rules being called tighter is why the Sabres were so good for those two years.
That's my story and I'm stickin' to it.
DISCLAIMER: I wouldn't give up those two years and the ridiculous excitement that came with them for anything, but let's call a spade a spade - they got lucky, plain and simple.
Edit: SECOND DISCLAIMER: Yes, they were talented, and yes a lot of those guys are still very good wherever they are, but those teams couldn't put together 60 minutes on a consistent basis and were too damn floaty. And those would still be problems now, only the game is much cluthier and grabbier than it was a few years ago. Guess what I'm saying is, the only consistency has been the coach. And that makes him the problem
you son of a...