PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Squanto wrote:
I never had a problem with the two year deal to see if he could stay healthy and produce. I had a problem with the amount of money he was given.
He did not deserve that kind of a raise based on a 20 game stretch and one good playoff run. He was given too much money no matter which way you look at it, production or potential.
Doesn't really matter. What would an extra 1 or 2 million of cap space had done for us over the past 2 years? We don't even spend to the cap.
Besides, contracts with shorter terms typically end up costing a little bit more because players are less willing to sign short term without money being on the table.
Yeah, Darcy has a tendency to reward potential. I'll give you that. But rewarding potential isn't dangerous for a 2 year contract.
It is for a 4 year, 5 year, or a 7 year contract, though.
I preface this on how I'm mad at Darcy...
Although the 2009 C UFA market was wafer thin...Connolly wouldn't have taken the same money or a little less than the $3.5M he was making? If he didn't...so what? Go get a $4M winger as we could have used one of those as well.
As soon as that deal was announced a Bruins fan friend of mine said to me...so Darcy's paying for Timmy's retirement? Thankfully, Patrice Bergeron was making more than Timmy coming off an 39 point season.
But add up that "premium potential" that has been wasted and that adds up to the salary of a pretty good player for at least a good chunk of their contract. Why not use that money for a good player and fill in the roster spots with all the farm club kids he's so enamored with?
I mean he's the General Manager...isn't he supposed to have a grasp on what makes a good hockey player and who's exhibiting those traits? Then again this is Buffalo sports and who knows what anyone in either front office actually has within their job description.
Its just sucks when your GM will tinker with a 2 year deal for a player who's potential is fading fast while another GM will throw out $3.9M, 11 season deals to resign Johan Franzen. Add up the "potential waste" and subtract that from the $43M Detroit sprinkled over that deal. If Darcy wastes $1 to 2 to 3M a year and he's been here how many years....sure Franzen likely won't play up to the $3.9M when he's 36, but which equally price or higher priced player on the Sabres won't play up to their contract in the present or short term?
Sorry if this is a bit off in fantasy hockey land, but I just can't stand the dumb money that Darcy loves to waste no matter how short the term on players he likes. At least John Butler hit on a few more players doing the same thing.