Squanto wrote:
OldTimeHockey wrote:
Its just funny to me that there are umpteen threads about how the Sabres don't spend enough or the right money and this is the business model of the Golisano regime.
THE SABRES HAVE SPENT TO THE CAP EVERY YEAR UNDER GOLISANO'S OWNERSHIP EXCEPT THIS ONE. THIS IS A FACT.
BTG has not been cheap. He's put the money out there. It's been spent wrong, and that's on Regier/Quinn.
Why would ownership keep a management group around that fails to achieve success? What's the logic behind missing the playoffs two years in a row and staying put with who you've got?
How about responsibility?
Quote:
Ruff acknowledged it took him more than a month to get over losing Drury and Briere, two players he had come to rely on heavily to get his message across and keep his team focused. It wasn't until late August that he finally began to look ahead.
"You're getting ready and looking at what you have, and you're thinking, 'The players that are gone are gone,"' Ruff said. "I really felt that we still had a good team. It just took a period of time."
Regier and Ruff have always consulted heavily on who and what they need for this team. And while Regier has made some questionable moves over time, he's no idiot.
In order for the Sabres to stay close to the level they were at, they'd need to keep at least one of these guys around.
So who exactly was responsible for BOTH of these players walking out the door?
Quote:
Regier's the epitome of a company man, the good soldier, his commitment to his bosses so steadfast that he's accepted blame (or declined to declare innocence) even when matters were out of his hands. He remained quiet following the botched re-signing of Chris Drury. Only later did it become known that his superiors were responsible for scuttling a deal that was all but done.
http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/colum ... 312015.eceOwnership.
Somehow, someway, BTG dropped the ball. And he knew it. And that's why he couldn't bring himself to replace those who make hockey decisions.