daz28 wrote:
Kovie has not been so bad lately. 4 goals, 8 points and plus 3 over the last 7 games. 15 years is a long contract, so basing your opinion on the first 30 games of it isn't a real good idea. It seems like he's the biggest "told ya so" topic there is. Where will all the told ya so people be if he's scoring goals in the Stanley Cup? NJ has a long history of strong play, and I'm not willing to say they've got no future.
You could not have missed the point by a larger margin, you basically shot the puck into the stands 5 feet away from an empty net, and then impaled yourself on your own stick.
The point is that he did more with less ice time last season, I meant nothing more about it than that.
Here's another example with a less controversial player:
Jerome Iginla.
In 08-09 he played 82 games with 16:31 ESTOI/G.
The very next year he played 82 games with 17:02, but scored 20 fewer points.
All I'm saying is that simply playing Vanek more at even strength isn't necessarily going to make him a more productive player. Some players are wired to go harder with less ice time, some have to change their game so they can handle more ice time. History suggests that Vanek does better with around 14m of ESOTI/G. Now with power play time the sky is the limit, because that is when he feasts.