It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 1:57 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 200 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Author Message
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:25 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
I don't really disagree with the column, but I don't think Miller definitely isn't expendable.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
OldTimeHockey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:19 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:13 pm
Posts: 1661
Rud wrote:
It's both. Our defense is giving up some bad plays, ala Grabner's breakaway, but Miller is coughing up some pretty bad goals. Like both wrap-around goals earlier. He needs a few games off.

Then again, we have Miller on this team because we expect him to be able to make those big saves when our defense lapses, which he hasn't been doing as of late.


Rud's got this one right.

Miller has had few easy games this season. Say what we did about Hank and Toni and how much money they got from their new teams, but we really missed their quietly good and pretty consistent play from the blueline. I know all the stat mongers will say that he's not really faced many more shots per minutes than he usually faces, but he's definitely facing more quality shots this season. If there was one thing that Hank and Toni were good at was pushing the play to the outside. Right now our slot's as open as a hooker after day 3 of a Shriner's convention.

(Let's also not forget that he plays a lot is usually in the top 3 in shots faced per season.) That alone could wear you down a bit.

Wide open shooting lanes open up far too often with our current D pairings. When Vanek and Stafford get an unobstructed shooting lane like that we expect them to score. So when a guy like Grabner get's one...he's gonna score on most of those.

Now Miller does need to buckle things done better. He's not ever going to go on a shutout run like Tim Thomas, but Miller's best skill is make that ridiculous save to keep us in a 2-1 or 3-2 tilt. He hasn't been making those saves...granted our D hasn't made it easy at all on him. He's not been the master of his own net and hasn't played positionally as well as we're used to seeing. I don't normally jump onto something Jerry Sullivan says, but I agree with him that Miller may be thinking too much.

If he can get out of his own head and just react....he'll be fine.

_________________
If your having goal problems, I feel bad for ya son....we got 99 problems but Vanek ain't one!


Top
 Profile  
 
DieHardFan
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:36 pm 
Offline
Emergency Call-Up

Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 4:31 pm
Posts: 243
So what it really boils down to is whether one Vezina year equates to greatness and indispensability, when the other 5 years have been less than spectacular, where he has not been in the conversation as a Vezina contender or led the team to any huge milestone, even when they have made the playoffs. It's really not about what he's done (or hasn't done) the past couple of weeks.

I like the guy, really do, and thoroughly believe he is good for this team. But I remain convinced that his on-ice achievements, when taken in the context of his entire career and compared to other contemporary goalies, really aren't that awe-inspiring to the point of being untouchable. I think he happens to be a very good and solid player on a team that over the past few seasons has not had any other true leaders or stud performers, which in turn raises his relative value to this team.


Top
 Profile  
 
DieHardFan
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:49 pm 
Offline
Emergency Call-Up

Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 4:31 pm
Posts: 243
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Exactly, Woz. The Sabres were physically dominated in their own end for large stretches of time during the third period. Miller did everything he could do to fight off those shots, but they were coming from everywhere.


C'mon man - he gave up 4 goals on 16 shots in the 3rd period of the 2 games combined where they had a 2-goal lead, and you've got no problem with that, whatsoever? Now we're gonna start talking quality of the shots? That's what kills me about his game - great start, no finish. A great goaltender finds a way to win at least one of those games!


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:31 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
DieHardFan wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Exactly, Woz. The Sabres were physically dominated in their own end for large stretches of time during the third period. Miller did everything he could do to fight off those shots, but they were coming from everywhere.


C'mon man - he gave up 4 goals on 16 shots in the 3rd period of the 2 games combined where they had a 2-goal lead, and you've got no problem with that, whatsoever? Now we're gonna start talking quality of the shots? That's what kills me about his game - great start, no finish. A great goaltender finds a way to win at least one of those games!


I'd have a problem with it if the Sabres played half way decent for stretches during those periods, but they just didn't. It was a constant assault the whole time.

There have been other games where the Sabres have been shelled because they're up 1 late in the third or something like that, and they've held on. But how you can expect a goaltender to keep you alive when you spend the whole period in your own zone?

That just doesn't happen.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
fly as hale
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:42 pm 
Offline
Mrs. Miller
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:02 pm
Posts: 7998
Location: Orchard Park
DieHardFan wrote:
2 games combined where they had a 2-goal lead, and you've got no problem with that, whatsoever? Now we're gonna start talking quality of the shots? That's what kills me about his game - great start, no finish. A great goaltender finds a way to win at least one of those games!

Great goalies play bad games sometimes. It's hockey.

_________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Hockey Night in Buffalo


Top
 Profile  
 
Wozniak
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:29 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:11 am
Posts: 2864
Location: Chicago
DieHardFan wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Exactly, Woz. The Sabres were physically dominated in their own end for large stretches of time during the third period. Miller did everything he could do to fight off those shots, but they were coming from everywhere.


C'mon man - he gave up 4 goals on 16 shots in the 3rd period of the 2 games combined where they had a 2-goal lead, and you've got no problem with that, whatsoever? Now we're gonna start talking quality of the shots? That's what kills me about his game - great start, no finish. A great goaltender finds a way to win at least one of those games!

quality of the shots a goalie faces ALWAYS matter regardless of what goalie your talking about. Last year, for example, Niemi rarely had to make the ZOMG THAT WAS FUCKING AMAZING save. the team in front of him really limited the quality of shots against him which made him look a lot better then he was (and most of Chicago fell for it).

hell, if you've watched any Sabres games in the last couple years you would have seen Miller getting shelled in some games. you would have also seen him bail out the fucking team in front of him.

_________________
Check out my website: http://www.artistzero.com

"That wasn't very nice...I do believe you killed my hat."

Driver of the FIRE LINDY RUFF Bandwagon since 2008.


Top
 Profile  
 
DieHardFan
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:10 am 
Offline
Emergency Call-Up

Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 4:31 pm
Posts: 243
Wozniak wrote:
DieHardFan wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Exactly, Woz. The Sabres were physically dominated in their own end for large stretches of time during the third period. Miller did everything he could do to fight off those shots, but they were coming from everywhere.


C'mon man - he gave up 4 goals on 16 shots in the 3rd period of the 2 games combined where they had a 2-goal lead, and you've got no problem with that, whatsoever? Now we're gonna start talking quality of the shots? That's what kills me about his game - great start, no finish. A great goaltender finds a way to win at least one of those games!

quality of the shots a goalie faces ALWAYS matter regardless of what goalie your talking about. Last year, for example, Niemi rarely had to make the ZOMG THAT WAS FUCKING AMAZING save. the team in front of him really limited the quality of shots against him which made him look a lot better then he was (and most of Chicago fell for it).

hell, if you've watched any Sabres games in the last couple years you would have seen Miller getting shelled in some games. you would have also seen him bail out the fucking team in front of him.


Nothing but excuses by all his apologists. He didn't get the job done. Period. He's the leader, the team's best player, and the face of the franchise, so he gets the lion's share of the blame when the team fails in big situations. That's how it works. And losing 2 playoff games after giving up 2 goal leads when that didn't happen at all during the season is without doubt failure.

When his finish is as good as his start, then I'll start feeling differently about his indispensability to the team.


Top
 Profile  
 
Sabresfansince1980
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:02 am 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 3021
Location: So far away
I'll be very comforted when you start feeling better about him.


Top
 Profile  
 
schooner44
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:31 pm 
Offline
First Rounder
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 141
Location: Albuquerque NM
Its a combination of both Miller & Defense. Last year our D-men were much more solid on the back end but less productive in the offensive zone. We brought in Leopold and finally gave Sekera the ice time he deserves but on the flip side, let Lydman and Tallinder walk. That's the biggest difference right now but also, Miller isn't making those incredible saves night in and night out to cover up defensive zone mistakes like last year.

I love Weber's grit but I would be a happy man if I never saw another one of his moronic giveaways right in the middle of our defensive zone. At this point, the team is better off without his toughness and giveaways...let Butler take Weber's place once Monty is back.

_________________
"Every time I think you say the dumbest thing ever...you keep on talkin' " - Hank Hill
"Starting today, the Buffalo Sabres' reason for existence will be to win a Stanley Cup" - Terry Pegula


Top
 Profile  
 
Vanek_Fanatic_26
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:46 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:24 am
Posts: 1998
Location: Buffalo
DieHardFan wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Exactly, Woz. The Sabres were physically dominated in their own end for large stretches of time during the third period. Miller did everything he could do to fight off those shots, but they were coming from everywhere.


C'mon man - he gave up 4 goals on 16 shots in the 3rd period of the 2 games combined where they had a 2-goal lead, and you've got no problem with that, whatsoever? Now we're gonna start talking quality of the shots? That's what kills me about his game - great start, no finish. A great goaltender finds a way to win at least one of those games!


One bad game does not define a goalie. Even Roy and Brodeur had their clunkers.

_________________
Girgensons for captain. Team Keep Nick DesLauriers forever.

@TJLuckman550


Top
 Profile  
 
VanekKing
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:49 pm 
Offline
Penalty Killer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:14 pm
Posts: 609
Location: Clarence, NY
We are gonna look back at this thread and laugh at it, just like all of the other negative miller threads..


*Not saying this thread was made to be negative by the OP*

_________________
Miller, Myers and Greir are sick, but not Jesus Christ..

KILL OTTAWA


Top
 Profile  
 
fly as hale
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:52 pm 
Offline
Mrs. Miller
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:02 pm
Posts: 7998
Location: Orchard Park
VanekKing wrote:
We are gonna look back at this thread and laugh at it, just like all of the other negative miller threads..


*Not saying this thread was made to be negative by the OP*

At least it's not as bad as the threads made a few years ago when a good handful of fans were advocating that we trade Miller and have (then) 18-year-old Jhonas Enroth (who had never played a single game in North America) be our starter because he was slated to become the next Henrik Lundqvist.

_________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Hockey Night in Buffalo


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:30 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
Reimer beat us tonight.

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:32 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
reimer and our forwards not showing up

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:44 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
optimus reim player good.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:45 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
At least this thread has some reasonable discussion.

I'm just going to be nuts hearing radio callers and seeing blogs declare every goal that Miller lets up from here on out as 'soft'.

Ponderous.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 10:47 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
optimus reim player good.


dont worry, yhoshi. apparently, im not speaking english either ;)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
fly as hale
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:40 pm 
Offline
Mrs. Miller
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:02 pm
Posts: 7998
Location: Orchard Park
Squanto wrote:
At least this thread has some reasonable discussion.

I'm just going to be nuts hearing radio callers and seeing blogs declare every goal that Miller lets up from here on out as 'soft'.

Ponderous.

Robitaille was absolutely hilarious when he was responding to some doofus who called into WGR 550 and said that Enroth should be playing over Miller.

_________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Hockey Night in Buffalo


Top
 Profile  
 
AudSabres
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:47 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:35 pm
Posts: 4998
Location: In your head, producing very weird thoughts.
fly as hale wrote:
Squanto wrote:
At least this thread has some reasonable discussion.

I'm just going to be nuts hearing radio callers and seeing blogs declare every goal that Miller lets up from here on out as 'soft'.

Ponderous.

Robitaille was absolutely hilarious when he was responding to some doofus who called into WGR 550 and said that Enroth should be playing over Miller.


I lol'd at that.

_________________
If it's a tight squeeze, spit on it! - NyI

He's a middling AHL player who had the good fortune of a drunk arbitrator. - The Squanto re: Tim Kennedy


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 200 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: