It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 5:11 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 138 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:17 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
Found this via Mirtle:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/news/story?id=6185492

JFC just get them out of Arizona already. This is an embarrassment.

_________________
mechaphil


Last edited by mechaphil on Wed Apr 13, 2011 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
AudSabres
PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:37 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:35 pm
Posts: 4998
Location: In your head, producing very weird thoughts.
Guess this puts tsn.ca's Jet-o-meter up a little more.

Common Winnipeg!!!! :clap:

_________________
If it's a tight squeeze, spit on it! - NyI

He's a middling AHL player who had the good fortune of a drunk arbitrator. - The Squanto re: Tim Kennedy


Top
 Profile  
 
Skyline_BNR34
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:12 am 
Offline
Cup Winner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 13019
Location: North Carolina
But that's not the guy who was planning to buy the Yotes though. Who is or what is the guy suing for and what does he gave to do with the yotes?

_________________
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
No need for violence, just tell her she's got a game misconduct and show her the door.

Rud wrote:
As I said in the GDT, the call on Rivet was horseshit. The Bruins player was holding onto Rivet's stick like it was the last fucking raft on the Titanic.


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:16 am 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
What are you talking about?

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 12:19 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
http://jetsowner.com/

:)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:13 am 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Skyline_BNR34 wrote:
But that's not the guy who was planning to buy the Yotes though. Who is or what is the guy suing for and what does he gave to do with the yotes?


Short version:

The new lease agreement calls for Glendale to give Hulsizer $100M up front, but recoup that money through parking fees and naming rights to certain things over the life of the lease. However,multiple studies of the revenues generated show that Glendale will never get their $100M back in full over the lease term.

The Goldwater Institute is a public policy organization. They do a lot of stuff, but one thing they do is watch for government agencies that do things they think violate laws, and go after them.

Arizona has a law that prohibits public money being used as a gift to a private business. The Goldwater Institute has alleged that because it's known in advance that Glendale will never get their money back in full, giving them the money would be a gift, and illegal under Arizona law. Basically : If I loan you $40 knowing that you'll only ever give me $20 back, I gave you a gift of $20.

So, they're basically saying 'If you do this, we will sue you for violating the gift law." The threat of a lawsuit is holding up the bond sale, which Glendale was going to use to generate the $100M. Glendale is now suing back, saying that because Goldwater is threatening to sue, thy're jeopardizing the lease agreement, and will cost Glendale money.

It's ugly, and all these lawsuits will probably cause the NHL to give up and move north.


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:24 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
The team clearly isn't wanted down there.

Winnipeg would be a great market. I don't understand why the NHL isn't jumping all over this.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:35 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
The team clearly isn't wanted down there.

Winnipeg would be a great market. I don't understand why the NHL isn't jumping all over this.


i think the NHL is fairly giving arizona a chance to keep the team in there, and i think its fair, but at some point, enough is enough, and you need to give yourself enough time to make a move and settle in.

as far as winnipeg goes, i would LOVE winnipeg, but i also know quebec city is hot for a team as well.

its too bad the yotes got that nice new barn, and they cant fill it. what the hell are they gonna do with it? the suns play downtown, and that arena (us airways arena) gets all the major concerts and events. you could potentially see an 8 year old arena tore down. doubtful.. but still. this goes beyond just the yotes moving for arizona.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:36 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
http://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2010/12/8/1536097/nhl-relocation-winnipeg-quebec-city is why they aren't, according to some SBN writer.

Also, a 15K seat arena in a hockey-starved region in Canada is just too damn small. Expand it another 3K.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
gr8daygo
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:55 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:56 pm
Posts: 2265
mechaphil wrote:
http://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2010/12/8/1536097/nhl-relocation-winnipeg-quebec-city is why they aren't, according to some SBN writer.

Also, a 15K seat arena in a hockey-starved region in Canada is just too damn small. Expand it another 3K.



I certainly do not want to see a team in southern ontario .... I'd say, based on that article... Hartford is the way to go... now im not sure if they have the arena for it... but it wouldn't be bad to see...

also, wonder what a team would do in KC.... there used to be a KC team .... they have an arena... interesting thought...

_________________
Belief - Commitment - Character - Discipline - Trust

E X C E L L E N C E


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:03 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
gr8daygo wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
http://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2010/12/8/1536097/nhl-relocation-winnipeg-quebec-city is why they aren't, according to some SBN writer.

Also, a 15K seat arena in a hockey-starved region in Canada is just too damn small. Expand it another 3K.



I certainly do not want to see a team in southern ontario .... I'd say, based on that article... Hartford is the way to go... now im not sure if they have the arena for it... but it wouldn't be bad to see...

also, wonder what a team would do in KC.... there used to be a KC team .... they have an arena... interesting thought...


from my understanding, hartford wants a team, but the city isnt what it used to be, and they dont feel they can support a team. i dunno, id like hartford as well. i just dont see it.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:06 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
Man... if Seattle had the proper facilities, it'd be an awesome hockey market.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:15 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Man... if Seattle had the proper facilities, it'd be an awesome hockey market.


no kidding. and that city would embrace the team very quickly after the loss of the sonics.

if the tacoma dome had a refrigeration system, that could work. in the mid 90s when they remodeled seattle center (now key arena).. it was done so no NHL team could move in to potentially take money away from the sonics. now how foolish does that move look?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:19 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Man... if Seattle had the proper facilities, it'd be an awesome hockey market.


no kidding. and that city would embrace the team very quickly after the loss of the sonics.

if the tacoma dome had a refrigeration system, that could work. in the mid 90s when they remodeled seattle center (now key arena).. it was done so no NHL team could move in to potentially take money away from the sonics. now how foolish does that move look?


Right? I was in Seattle a couple of years ago. It's an awesome city. Key arena is in an interesting spot, though. Wedged in the arts center.

Parking would be a huge issue to tackle, on top of the extensive renovations the arena would need to house a hockey team.

Image

It's cool though because it's dug somewhat into the ground. The ice is probably really good there.

Image

As you can see though, there's no parking in sight.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:24 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Man... if Seattle had the proper facilities, it'd be an awesome hockey market.


no kidding. and that city would embrace the team very quickly after the loss of the sonics.

if the tacoma dome had a refrigeration system, that could work. in the mid 90s when they remodeled seattle center (now key arena).. it was done so no NHL team could move in to potentially take money away from the sonics. now how foolish does that move look?


Right? I was in Seattle a couple of years ago. It's an awesome city. Key arena is in an interesting spot, though. Wedged in the arts center.

Parking would be a huge issue to tackle, on top of the extensive renovations the arena would need to house a hockey team.

Image

It's cool though because it's dug somewhat into the ground. The ice is probably really good there.

Image

As you can see though, there's no parking in sight.


one of the reasons the sonics left was because they wanted a new facility. the key arena looks awesome, and a complete overhaul could bring in an NHL team. but i dont even think the thunderbirds play there anymore.

no, they built their own arena.

now, heres an idea, modeled after the canes. the hurricanes moved to greensboro and played at the greensboro Colosseum till the RBC center was finished. so, could an NHL team survive 3 years in spokane before moving to seattle?

edit: doesnt look like it, spokanes arena doesnt sit more then 11,000 people.

damn, i REALLY like this seattle idea.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:33 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
I do too Mike. Seattle, with the support and renovations, would be an AWESOME hockey market.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:40 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
mechaphil wrote:
http://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2010/12/8/1536097/nhl-relocation-winnipeg-quebec-city is why they aren't, according to some SBN writer.

Also, a 15K seat arena in a hockey-starved region in Canada is just too damn small. Expand it another 3K.


The position of the Winnipeg group is that although the place is only 15k seats, they'd fill it every night, which still puts them in front of about 10 NHL teams.

I'd have to think they could find a way to get the place close to 17k though.


Top
 Profile  
 
AudSabres
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:47 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:35 pm
Posts: 4998
Location: In your head, producing very weird thoughts.
Squanto wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
http://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2010/12/8/1536097/nhl-relocation-winnipeg-quebec-city is why they aren't, according to some SBN writer.

Also, a 15K seat arena in a hockey-starved region in Canada is just too damn small. Expand it another 3K.


The position of the Winnipeg group is that although the place is only 15k seats, they'd fill it every night, which still puts them in front of about 10 NHL teams.

I'd have to think they could find a way to get the place close to 17k though.


Yeah, when they built the MTS Centre, they did so with the possibillity of expanding it by another 2-3000, should the NHL come calling. Little tid-bit, the new barn in Newark is actually smaller than the old CAA in the swamp. So they'd only have to expand by 2000 or so to keep up with current NHL rinks. They've been doing some reno's to the press area to expand it to accommodate more exits and washroom facilities and what not.

They've raised the roof in Calgary in recent years to accommodate more seating, shit, they did the same to The Aud back in the day. So this feat can be accomplished. Providing that the upgrades are approved by local fire and building codes, of course.

_________________
If it's a tight squeeze, spit on it! - NyI

He's a middling AHL player who had the good fortune of a drunk arbitrator. - The Squanto re: Tim Kennedy


Top
 Profile  
 
mechaphil
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:47 pm 
Offline
Thy Horror Cosmic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:57 pm
Posts: 19086
Location: BFLO
It's not that I don't think they can fill it, I don't think it's big enough to suit demand.

_________________
mechaphil


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:48 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
Squanto wrote:
mechaphil wrote:
http://www.sbnation.com/nhl/2010/12/8/1536097/nhl-relocation-winnipeg-quebec-city is why they aren't, according to some SBN writer.

Also, a 15K seat arena in a hockey-starved region in Canada is just too damn small. Expand it another 3K.


The position of the Winnipeg group is that although the place is only 15k seats, they'd fill it every night, which still puts them in front of about 10 NHL teams.

I'd have to think they could find a way to get the place close to 17k though.


at orlando arena, they replaced the seats with slightly narrower seats to bump up seating from 15,000 to 17,000 in the shaq days.... you add 1 seat per row.. that could add up mighty quick, couldnt it?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 138 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: