NYIntensity wrote:
Occurs in the department of defense.
In 1947 the U.S. changed the name of the Department of War to the Department of Defense. I think that subtle change had a profound impact on budget negotiations ever since.
If congress is negotiating the budget for the Department of War and we are not actually at war, then it is easy to make the argument that the budget should be less than at a time of war. However, if you propose cutting the budget for defense, even at a time of peace, well then, you are just weak on national security and possibly an enemy of American freedom.
The total amount of our tax dollars spent on "defense" for 2012 is between $1.030–$1.415 trillion. Our military spending is now equal to that of the rest of the world combined.
Since I don't see us ever going back to the Department of War title, perhaps it is time we expanded the definition of defense. Isn't it part of the U.S. defense to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure? Doesn't a strong country need modern roads, bridges, ports, and electronic and communications grids? Doesn't a strong country need police, firefighters, nurses, and emergency first responders? Doesn't a strong country need the best schools in the world to prepare the next generation of Americans to compete in that world?
Aren't those things part of the defense of the nation?
There is so much more needed for the real defense of our country than just another boondoggle weapons system or a bloated and wasteful military-industrial complex.