It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 6:43 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
Sabresfansince1980
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:11 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 3021
Location: So far away
PatGreen wrote:
Sabresfansince1980 wrote:
PatGreen wrote:
looked fine to me. bullshit penalty. can change my mind when i see a video.


Lol, that was the textbook definition of what the league is finally trying to eliminate from the game. He'll be gone for at least the rest of the Chicago series.


glad you noticed i said i haven't seen the video.


"Looked fine to me. bullshit penalty." Apparently you saw it, and from previous discussions you seem to come down on the 'let 'em play" side of the issue. I lol'd because of the "bullshit' comment, but it's not worth getting bent about it. We'll find out today what the league thinks anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PatGreen
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:17 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
Sabresfansince1980 wrote:
"Looked fine to me. bullshit penalty." Apparently you saw it, and from previous discussions you seem to come down on the 'let 'em play" side of the issue. I lol'd because of the "bullshit' comment, but it's not worth getting bent about it. We'll find out today what the league thinks anyway.

i didn't see it when i posted that. i watched it when it got posted on the internet. typically i am more of a "let 'em play", but i think the villainous offenders should be dealt HUGE penalties, not a paltry 5 games. if your elbow is UP, then you get ten games the first time, 20 the second, and a season the third. if you clearly crush a guy from behind, 5 games, then 15 games, then a season.

it's a contact sport, stuff like this does happen and there's no way to argue otherwise. the best way to change this is to stop teaching players to drive up and across when they hit and to check the old fashioned way- across the body or use hip checks. much safer.

edit: for the record, i'm okay with interference being called and i was since i saw it.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:42 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
watching sportscenter... no suspension, barnaby says.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:08 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
yup

nothing.

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=362743

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:48 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Worst justification I've seen yet.

Quote:
No suspension for Torres. Right call. Hard, brutal hit, sure. Hockey has brutality. If Torres had accelerated into him, different story.


What kind of logic is that? Slower hits to the head are ok, but faster ones are bad?

EDIT: Even worse is the NHL's justification that the area behind the net is a 'hitting area'.

Because concussions only happen in the neutral zone. What a joke.


Top
 Profile  
 
PatGreen
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:53 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
i still haven't seen where his head gets hit first.


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:55 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Overhead angle is clear as day to me. Shoulder to the head. But, it doesn't really matter. The league doesn't really care about this stuff anyways.


Top
 Profile  
 
PatGreen
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:20 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
when do those players hit have to start taking responsibility for their positioning? rule 48 says the area behind the net is a hitting area, and seabrook put himself in a prone position in said hitting area.

i'm not saying it's always the "hitee's" fault, so don't spin it that way. have we moved completely away from the area where people say "keep your head up"?

i don't like to see people get hurt, but i don't want to watch euro hockey, either.

there has to be a happy medium somewhere, and i'm confused as to where that is now.


Top
 Profile  
 
SABRESAllTheWay
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:21 pm 
Offline
MegaDouche
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:41 am
Posts: 2752
Location: Fairfax, VA
I mean, keeping your elbows and arms in are obvious, but man I think he completely forgot to bend his knees to match the height difference and holy fuck did he forget to keep his shoulder in. Ban his ass for three seasons...

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Displaced Fan
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:30 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 1:34 am
Posts: 4097
PatGreen wrote:
when do those players hit have to start taking responsibility for their positioning? rule 48 says the area behind the net is a hitting area, and seabrook put himself in a prone position in said hitting area.

i'm not saying it's always the "hitee's" fault, so don't spin it that way. have we moved completely away from the area where people say "keep your head up"?

i don't like to see people get hurt, but i don't want to watch euro hockey, either.

there has to be a happy medium somewhere, and i'm confused as to where that is now.


There are plenty of obvious suspendable hits and I hate them. That being said though, keep your fucking head up man. A lot of hits that would normally destroy a guy are avoided or muffled by seeing it coming and preparing for it. Also, a lot of hits that wouldn't be so bad and that are routine end up being fucking insane because the guy who gets hit isn't watching around him. Hits to the head should be adressed seriously and throw head hunsters out but sometimes bad hits happen accidentally.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:32 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
PatGreen wrote:
there has to be a happy medium somewhere, and i'm confused as to where that is now.


I don't disagree. I just feel like this is a perfect case where the hitter could have executed a monster hit cleanly and avoided head contact. If Torres doesn't pop up at the last second, not a jump, but going from flexed knee to straight up, he doesn't come close to Seabrook's head. Cranks him square in the shoulder, great hit. He didn't need to do that to have the same effect on the play.

Players just don't have respect for each other. They don't care if the other guy gets hurt, they just want to plaster any part of him right onto SportsCentre.


Top
 Profile  
 
Displaced Fan
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:39 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 1:34 am
Posts: 4097
Squanto wrote:
PatGreen wrote:
there has to be a happy medium somewhere, and i'm confused as to where that is now.


I don't disagree. I just feel like this is a perfect case where the hitter could have executed a monster hit cleanly and avoided head contact. If Torres doesn't pop up at the last second, not a jump, but going from flexed knee to straight up, he doesn't come close to Seabrook's head. Cranks him square in the shoulder, great hit. He didn't need to do that to have the same effect on the play.

Players just don't have respect for each other. They don't care if the other guy gets hurt, they just want to plaster any part of him right onto SportsCentre.


I'm not saying that you're wrong completely but it's a fast paced game man. I have a hard time laying intent on Torres. I mean, he may have straightened up because he anticipated Seabrook too or shit maybe he just did it to anticipate getting the puck...I don't know. At the end of the day though I think if the league just had a blanket rule that was clear cut then players would keep it in mind more. Like mando suspension for a head hit then pile on more games for each additional head shot. Get the guys to think about it more and maybe you'd see less hits like this....but if hitters are thinking they have to ginger around hits you may end up having puck getters paying even less attention, relying on that rule as a buffer and then who knows. I don't have the answer but I do think the mando rule would help.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:47 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Clearer and evenly applied rules would be a nice change. No matter where you stand on the issue,that much is true.

I don't think that Torres stood up in order to headshot. I think he did it to highlight reel Seabrook. That seems to be the way people are taught to hit these days; by extending upwards into the check instead of through the player like I was taught. My view on it is that the upwards angle of attack is what's causing all these ugly hits.


Top
 Profile  
 
PatGreen
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:51 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
Squanto wrote:
My view on it is that the upwards angle of attack is what's causing all these ugly hits.

lol that's one hundred and ten percent physics. i've been saying that off and on for years. that's why there's no hip checking anymore. it's all drive up and through at a 45 degree angle. not across and not through. until the changes start in the youth, there won't be any seen in the nhl.

very similar to the nfl's inability to tackle anymore.


Top
 Profile  
 
daz28
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:50 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 3363
If Raffi was a Duck, he'd have had the book thrown at him. Lucky for him he isn't, and he's on one of the league's current darling teams. I agree B. Ryan's foot stomp was a douche move, but he's never even been suspended before. Raffi just served a 4 gamer for a similar offense. Colon Stalin and his fancy title need to take a long walk off a short pier. I'd be totally fine if the league dispensed of him and Buttman tomorrow. I hate those 2.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:12 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
lol the owners just signed bettman to a 5 year extension.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:30 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Quote:
Colin Campbell statement on Torres hit "When Rule 48 (Illegal Check to the Head) was unanimously adopted by the General Managers in March 2010, there was no intention to make this type of shoulder hit to the head illegal. In fact, at that time, we distributed a video to all players and teams that showed a similar hit on a defenseman by an attacking forward coming from the opposite direction behind the net and stated that this is a 'legal play'. "This hit meets none of the criteria that would subject Torres to supplemental discipline, including an application of Rule 48: he did not charge his opponent or leave his feet to deliver this check. He did not deliver an elbow or extended forearm and this hit was not 'late'."

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
PatGreen
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:33 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
cross where's the source for this?

edit: found it.

http://aol.sportingnews.com/nhl/story/2 ... ffi-torres


Top
 Profile  
 
daz28
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:25 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 3363
Were there any videos distributed to the fans, or when were we supposed to know what the "intimate feelings of the owners" really were?? I'll guess we were to be informed sometime after "no goal". I'm also not sure if I spotted any apology in the terminology to the Vancouver Canucks on the bad call, either. Great job Mr. Campbell, as usual.


Top
 Profile  
 
Sabresfansince1980
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:28 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 3021
Location: So far away
I'm really confused now...more than usual.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: