It is currently Fri May 29, 2026 2:48 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 161 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
PatGreen
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 8:46 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
mechaphil wrote:
No doubt in my mind that the orders were "Shoot to kill" and nothing else.

for truth. silly to think otherwise.


Top
 Profile  
 
backthatSASSup
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 10:27 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1549
Location: BuffaLOVE
I disagree with you both. I'm just a silly thinker, I guess.


Top
 Profile  
 
PatGreen
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 10:31 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
what's the point of capturing him? put him in guantanamo and deal with that? increased terrorist activity until he's released? more daniel pearls?

if there was any reason to bring him alive, you can be sure SEAL 6 would have done it, especially since he was unarmed. obama watched the whole thing go down and at any point could have said "capture him." the order was to kill.

no one even wanted his body, apparently, so he was buried at sea within 24 hours (so he would be buried in accordance with muslim tradition). it also prevented a grave site for being used as a memorial.


Top
 Profile  
 
backthatSASSup
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 10:34 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1549
Location: BuffaLOVE
I definitely think if he wasn't trying to resist as they claim he was and that he surrendered, they would have not killed him. To do so would be against international law, whether you like it or not. Were there orders given that he could be killed? Yes, if he resisted. And that's the story the US is sticking with. You can resist and be unarmed.

Silly me for thinking so.


Top
 Profile  
 
PatGreen
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 10:38 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
no it's silly that you don't think the order was shoot to kill.

if you don't think they could have fabricated that he resisted, you're ignoring government. it's not like people follow the geneva convention anyways.

captain barbossa said it right... "it's not really rules, it's more of a guideline."


Top
 Profile  
 
backthatSASSup
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 10:40 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1549
Location: BuffaLOVE
I'm not disputing that they didn't have orders to kill; they did, if he resisted. If he had surrendered, I don't think they still would have killed him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PatGreen
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 11:29 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
well it seemed like you took offense to my "silly" comment, which was the same point that was in your last post.


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 11:43 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
jvaccaro6 wrote:
As much as I agree with this, I think it was an unspoken order to kill him. Can you imagine the black eye the Obama Administration would get if they actually ordered the assassination of Bin Ladin? Especially if Wiki-Leaks got their hands on it. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but every Republican would have been screaming in fury; especially given Obama's stance on world peace. Ordering any assassination would be just an ugly, ugly mark on his resume.


There isn't a politician in this country that would have criticized Obama for a kill only order. Not a one.


Top
 Profile  
 
backthatSASSup
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 9:57 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1549
Location: BuffaLOVE
What do you guys think of Mr. Bush declining the invitation to go to ground zero to lay a wreath down with President Obama? Here's some quotes from people regarding his decline to show:

Quote:
"It would be an extraordinary -- dare I say 'unprecedented,' to borrow one of Obama's favorite words? -- act of political maturity, good faith, and transcendent unity against our common jihadi enemies," Malkin wrote on her blog. "Dubya needs to change his mind -- for America's sake."


Quote:
In a statement, David Sherzer, spokesman for the ex-president, said Bush "appreciated the invite, but has chosen in his post-presidency to remain largely out of the spotlight. He continues to celebrate with all Americans this important victory in the war on terror."


Quote:
"He and his family ... have an old-fashioned view, that we only have one president at a time," added Gergen, who has served in Democratic and Republican administrations. "I think this is quite genuine on the part of President Bush."


Quote:
Still, Malkin insists that Bush's visit would show the world that both parties stand together on at least one issue.

"Side by side, the Democratic commander in chief and his GOP nemesis would join hands at the former site of the World Trade Center towers, pay heartfelt tribute to the thousands of victims of Osama bin Laden here at home and around the world, and pledge continued support for our military, intelligence, and homeland security personnel at home and around the world," she added.


Quote:
LZ Granderson, a CNN.com contributor, writes that "in a perfect world, both parties would come together to celebrate what bin Laden's death means to the country's sense of closure."


Quote:
"It was also important that President Bush put in place counterterrorism strategies and policies, efforts that the military and intelligence have been making over the years," former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on CNN's "American Morning" on Tuesday. "To work together better to achieve that kind of level of integration didn't happen yesterday. This is something that has been happening for quite a long time."


http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/05/04/ ... tml?hpt=T1

I understand where Mr. Bush is coming from, and I also feel that he probably just wants to sink into a normal, somewhat private life after his presidency since it wasn't so well regarded. I do think that he should go, though, just because it culminates all his hard work he put in for a cause he believed him. I don't agree with Mr. Bush's policies and I didn't like him as president, but he does deserve some credit for bin Laden's capture. Finding him was a meticulous mission and I don't find it the least unsettling or any less of an accomplishment because it took 10 years. I think it would just demonstrate some unity in a time of partisan politics, because both parties can agree that bin Laden's death was a big accomplishment for our War on Terror.


Top
 Profile  
 
backthatSASSup
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 9:58 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1549
Location: BuffaLOVE
Squanto wrote:
jvaccaro6 wrote:
As much as I agree with this, I think it was an unspoken order to kill him. Can you imagine the black eye the Obama Administration would get if they actually ordered the assassination of Bin Ladin? Especially if Wiki-Leaks got their hands on it. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but every Republican would have been screaming in fury; especially given Obama's stance on world peace. Ordering any assassination would be just an ugly, ugly mark on his resume.


There isn't a politician in this country that would have criticized Obama for a kill only order. Not a one.


I don't necessarily believe that anger would come from within our own country, but I do think it would hurt our world image (possibly more than this already has).


Top
 Profile  
 
jvaccaro6
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 10:01 am 
Offline
Certifiably Hotter than ETC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 3689
Before this turns into a Bush hate thread, he's also declined invites from several GOP lead officials as well. He said when he left the white house he simply wanted to fade from the spotlight, and go back to his ranch. He's stood his ground on that stance, and I have gotta say, I don't blame him. He had (unfairly more often than not) one of the worst approval ratings as a president, and simply got run down doing the job. If he takes 30 years to recharge his batteries, I'd be shocked, but not necessarily disappointed in him. He needed to get away from the lime light, and has done so.

_________________
"She's like plan C after an 18 pack"

Squanto 7/27/2010


Top
 Profile  
 
Displaced Fan
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 10:03 am 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 1:34 am
Posts: 4097
It's pretty plain that capturing him would have been a TERRIBLE plan. Alive he's a symbol of resistance and a martyr much more so than dead and buried at sea with no head stone to pray at. Killing him is quick and easy while going through a trial would not only take forever and give this d-bag a gazillion more media airtime miles. And when he's found guilty...what of? Do we want to deal with the "Did he get a fair trial?" bullshit you know would come up? What about the obvious pissing contest that some countries would insist on dragging us into as to who should prosecute him and for which crimes since he was responsible for so much shit in so many countries? Fuck that. Dead and gone. Way way less messy than having to juggle the fucking bologna shit storm that we'd have on our hands if he was kickin' it in a US prison.

I think that when weighed against the possible benefits of capturing him (intelligence) it's pretty clear that the only order that would have made sense was to put a bullet in his head. It's just business. ha!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Hammygoodness
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 10:06 am 
Offline
More Heart Than Skill
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:07 am
Posts: 2030
Location: Ilion, NY
The decision wasn't whether to capture UBL or kill him, but whether to kill him with a missile or to use a SEAL team to get confirmation. They weren't going in there to take prisoners. And I agree with the decision.

Ham

_________________
Do you believe yet?


Top
 Profile  
 
fly as hale
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 10:07 am 
Offline
Mrs. Miller
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:02 pm
Posts: 7998
Location: Orchard Park
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/0 ... tml?hpt=C1

Some snippets...

Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama had all issued orders to kill or capture the al Qaeda leader.

"The authority (during the raid) was to kill bin Laden," CIA Director Leon Panetta said Tuesday during an interview with PBS. "Obviously, under the rules of engagement, if he had in fact thrown up his hands, surrendered, and didn't appear to be representing any kind of threat, then they were to capture him. But they had full authority to kill him."

Asked if bin Laden tried to grab a weapon or physically attack a commando, the official would say only that "he didn't hold up his hands and surrender."

Bin Laden, considered a combatant by virtue of his position as head of al Qaeda, needed to immediately make clear a desire to surrender, if that was his decision, in order to avoid being shot. That apparently didn't happen, Groves said.

"The United States offered bin Laden the possibility to surrender, but he refused," Martin Scheinin, the United Nations' special rapporteur for human rights, said Tuesday. "Bin Laden would have avoided destruction if he had raised a white flag."

_________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Hockey Night in Buffalo


Top
 Profile  
 
backthatSASSup
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 10:40 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1549
Location: BuffaLOVE
Super graphic photos in this link. Don't look at pictures 7-9 if you get easily grossed out.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/0 ... tml?hpt=T1

Number 7 looks like his son they believe was being groomed to take over bin Laden. Number 8 was armed with a deadly mini water gun. Number 9, I have no comment. Obviously the one photo missing is OBL.


Top
 Profile  
 
Los9090
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2011 12:55 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:35 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: Glenville, NY
Al Queda confirms bin Ladin's death and VOWS revenge...

_________________
"...they came down into the stands and asked if I knew how to do play by play. I said...No. But. I'll take a shot at it if you want".- Rick Jeanneret


Top
 Profile  
 
AudSabres
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2011 1:44 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:35 pm
Posts: 4998
Location: In your head, producing very weird thoughts.
I'm guessing this is the long hand form of Al Queda saying, "This shit just got real".

If true though, seriously? Attacks on the 10th anniversary of 9/11?

Seriously?

_________________
If it's a tight squeeze, spit on it! - NyI

He's a middling AHL player who had the good fortune of a drunk arbitrator. - The Squanto re: Tim Kennedy


Top
 Profile  
 
Displaced Fan
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2011 1:58 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 1:34 am
Posts: 4097
The Taliban and Bin laden's overall goal is what they call the "death of a thousand cuts". Death by debt. They bogged down the USSR in a long drawn out campaign which hurt them financially and they believe that bleeding them slowly was a big part of why the USSR crumbled. That same goal is exactly what they are trying to enact with us. It costs them a few thousand to bomb us or pull off a 9/11 while it costs us billions/trillions to defend ourselves and push an offense. The more we get roped into a fight with them, the more we're being our worst enemy. It's the reaction to their actions that cause the most harm. I don't think it takes a genius to look around and go "Hmmm...".

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:05 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Al Qaeda was held together because of Bin Ladin's personality and charisma. With him gone, they'll start to fracture into smaller groups lead by different people who have different ideas about how to proceed.

I'd guess they'll be irrelevant within 5 years. At least I hope so.


Top
 Profile  
 
MsRussellBeebe
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2011 2:12 pm 
Offline
Two-Way Center
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:02 pm
Posts: 824
Bwahahahahaha!


Attachments:
osama_bin_laden_facebook.jpg
osama_bin_laden_facebook.jpg [ 17.63 KiB | Viewed 2441 times ]

_________________
[ERROR 404: User brain not found - Try again later]
"Sarcasm and cynicism: Just two of the many services I provide."
"Never make someone a priority when you are only an option for them."
"You can't polish a turd."
Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 161 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: