It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 7:16 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
Vanek_Fanatic_26
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 12:38 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:24 am
Posts: 1998
Location: Buffalo
backthatSASSup wrote:
Stuuuuuuu wrote:
I'd like to see the balance sheets too. Just some simple post it note math tells me that if most teams are spending to the around the cap of approximately $60 million, then player salaries league wide would come to about $1.8 billion. If the NHL took in close to $3 billion in revenue last year, then they'd be sinking 60% of revenue into player salaries. Now, I'm not sure what the average percentage of revenue labor costs account for in most industries (wasn't easily found by a Google search), but 60% seems pretty high to me. Especially when you consider that that's only PLAYER labor costs, and doesn't factor in salaries of all other staff, like management, coaches, trainers, janitorial staff, retail employees, etc. Then of course, you have the cost of buying equipment, the maintaining of facilities (refrigeration and humidity control no doubt being a major expense in this sport). There's also advertising and plenty of other expenses that I'm sure I'm missing here.

It's just hard for me to see how running an NHL team could be profitable (or even could cover costs) for 30 different businesses operating in that financial atmosphere.


Two major things I think you're forgetting are sponsorships and endorsements. These teams probably make a great deal of money from that, in addition to ticket sales and merchandising.

I think Phil once provided the correct term in that owning a sports franchise is what is called a vanity asset. In appearance it looks like a very valuable asset, but in reality they generate losses. At the same time, owning a sports franchise is probably wise for someone generating a lot of income because the losses offset any income they have, thus reducing their tax liabilities. I don't really know, though, since I don't access to the information.

But to kinda refer back to your post, I ultimately think that contraction is inevitable and should happen. If you look at the NBA, for example, the superstars are clustering together and the other teams can't even compare. Having a large amount of teams mean that too many average players enter the league and can't compete with teams that have a conglomerate of super stars. Having fewer teams, in my opinion, makes it more competitive and interesting.


Or having a more restrictive CBA would help, but the players unions are too greedy over the millions of dollars they already make.

_________________
Girgensons for captain. Team Keep Nick DesLauriers forever.

@TJLuckman550


Top
 Profile  
 
Stuuuuuuu
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 12:12 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 2876
Location: Portland, Oregano
I can only assume that endorsements and sponsorships are included in that $3 billion in revenue the league took in this season.


Top
 Profile  
 
Vanek_Fanatic_26
PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 3:06 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:24 am
Posts: 1998
Location: Buffalo
Absolutely. It's called revenue "sharing" for a reason lol.

_________________
Girgensons for captain. Team Keep Nick DesLauriers forever.

@TJLuckman550


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron