It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 2:31 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 344 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 18  Next
Author Message
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:16 am 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
Yeah, those questions are worded to guide the audience into thinking a certain way.

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
Mr. Natural
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:30 am 
Offline
7th Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:45 pm
Posts: 279
Location: A higher plane
Maybe someone could point out exactly how the questions are biased.

I don't see it.

They are simply asking what people think of the two movements. The Occupy Wall Street question gets some degree of explanation added, but that is for the simple reason that most people being polled are unfamiliar with the movement, since it is only a couple of weeks old, whereas the Tea Party has been around long enough to have worked its way into the national consciousness.

On another note, I do not understand the derision and hostility directed at these folks. Are they unfocused, unorganized, and perhaps inconsistent in their message? Sure. They are also mostly kids, so what do you expect?

At the very least they are doing something most of us never even come close to, which is avail ourselves of our guaranteed right to influence the national dialogue on an important issue. They are engaged. If they were not out there protesting would we then be bashing the younger generation for their apathy?

Give them a break. Whether you agree or disagree with their arguments, at least they are engaged in national issues of importance. Isn't that something we should expect of all citizens in a democratic society?

_________________
th' only knower of th' cosmic mysteries alive at this time


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:39 am 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Mr. Natural wrote:
Maybe someone could point out exactly how the questions are biased.

I don't see it.

They are simply asking what people think of the two movements. The Occupy Wall Street question gets some degree of explanation added, but that is for the simple reason that most people being polled are unfamiliar with the movement, since it is only a couple of weeks old, whereas the Tea Party has been around long enough to have worked its way into the national consciousness.


You're intelligent enough that this shouldn't have to be explained.

Each question has a possible response of 'DON'T KNOW ENOUGH'. If the person being asked doesn't know, that's what they should answer. They should not be told 'Oh, this is what it is. Sorta. Now what do you think of it?'

The question is leading.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:42 am 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Mr. Natural wrote:
Maybe someone could point out exactly how the questions are biased.

I don't see it.

They used examples of their grievances that most people would generally agree with.
Maybe they should add: "Many of them believe 9/11 was perpetrated by the US government..."
or, "Many of them express a desire to replace our capitalist system with Socialism, communism or other such economic systems they feel are more equitable."

Qualifying statements kinda matter in polling.
Two candidates can poll the same question in different ways and produce the poll results they want.
Quote:
On another note, I do not understand the derision and hostility directed at these folks. Are they unfocused, unorganized, and perhaps inconsistent in their message? Sure. They are also mostly kids, so what do you expect?

Yes, we all expect kids in their early 20's to be naive idealists and to use their considerable free time to rail against injustices.
Nothing new.
Now that they've cost the city of New York millions of dollars and gotten their message out, I think people expect them to move on to something more substantive...like grooming candidates, forming a political party or PAC's, things like that.
They're walking the line between protesting and being a squatting nuisance.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Mr. Natural
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:19 am 
Offline
7th Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:45 pm
Posts: 279
Location: A higher plane
Crosscheck wrote:
They're walking the line between protesting and being a squatting nuisance.

LOL.

ALL protesters are seen as "a squatting nuisance" by someone. Usually the very powers they are protesting.

That is sort of the point, isn't it? To be a big enough nuisance to get those in power to take action in order to make the nuisance go away.

_________________
th' only knower of th' cosmic mysteries alive at this time


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:24 am 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Mr. Natural wrote:
ALL protesters are seen as "a squatting nuisance" by someone. Usually the very powers they are protesting.

That is sort of the point, isn't it? To be a big enough nuisance to get those in power to take action in order to make the nuisance go away.


Do you think, given no other specific actions, these protesters will influence legislation in any way?

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Hammygoodness
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:59 am 
Offline
More Heart Than Skill
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:07 am
Posts: 2030
Location: Ilion, NY
Look, I approve of people exercising their right to free speech and right to assemble. I even agree with some of the sentiments, such as being against bailouts for the banks and cutting away much of the government/big business connection. But I think there are those out there that want to use the unrest for a revolution, which is dangerous in my mind. I also think many want to use the movement to bring down capitalism, which I also think is dangerous. I'm sure some of the protesters themselves may agree with these two things, but I don't know how many, since their message is so disjointed. I just hope they don't end up getting used by those who are savvy at maneuvering the masses.

Ham

_________________
Do you believe yet?


Top
 Profile  
 
Mr. Natural
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:20 pm 
Offline
7th Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:45 pm
Posts: 279
Location: A higher plane
Crosscheck wrote:
Mr. Natural wrote:
ALL protesters are seen as "a squatting nuisance" by someone. Usually the very powers they are protesting.

That is sort of the point, isn't it? To be a big enough nuisance to get those in power to take action in order to make the nuisance go away.


Do you think, given no other specific actions, these protesters will influence legislation in any way?

No, I don't.

However, I think that no one is more surprised at the popular response to this protest than the protesters themselves. I get the impression that this grew much faster and much larger than any of them anticipated. They look like they are making it up as they go.

P.S. The city blinked, at least for now, in the clean-up showdown.

_________________
th' only knower of th' cosmic mysteries alive at this time


Last edited by Mr. Natural on Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Stuuuuuuu
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:27 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 2876
Location: Portland, Oregano
In Portland the protest started last Wednesday. Yes there were arrests yesterday and they had blocked one block of a public street until then, but all in all, it's been pretty calm and conflict-free as far as these things go. The protestors negotiated with the organizers of the Portland Marathon that happened last weekend. They agreed on where they would camp out so as not to disrupt the volunteer station for the marathon. They planned for things like bathroom needs. The protestors sent the mayor white roses to show their appreciation of how he'd dealt with them. I heard on the radio yesterday that there was already a vegetable garden there. More power to them.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:30 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Female Coast guard member harassed and spat upon by Occupy Boston protesters...the Coast guard has now advised its members to avoid the area while in uniform
http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/loc ... r-20111013

Occupy Wall Street protesters jump over barriers this morning and initiate a conflict with waiting police
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manh ... kMxaEW1sYP

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Mr. Natural
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:51 pm 
Offline
7th Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:45 pm
Posts: 279
Location: A higher plane
Crosscheck wrote:
Female Coast guard member harassed and spat upon by Occupy Boston protesters...the Coast guard has now advised its members to avoid the area while in uniform
http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/loc ... r-20111013

"Devon Pendleton, a spokesman for Occupy Boston, doesn't believe that those male protesters are actually part of the movement. However, Pendleton wants to be clear, that if protesters are responsible for doing something so disrespectful, he'd like to apologize on behalf of Occupy Boston.

The peaceful protesters say the violence wasn't supposed to happen and a group of anarchists were the ones rebelling. They say they do not condone that type of behavior."


Large protest groups are often judged by the actions of their most extreme and radical members, just as the Tea Party movement was unfairly tainted by the actions of its most racist followers.

_________________
th' only knower of th' cosmic mysteries alive at this time


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:21 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
If your protest group is all about inclusion and you willingly allow violent anarchists to join your ranks you will be judged accordingly.
Don't want to be judged like that? Kick out the anarchists.

Not rocket science.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:41 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Crosscheck wrote:
If your protest group is all about inclusion and you willingly allow violent anarchists to join your ranks you will be judged accordingly.
Don't want to be judged like that? Kick out the anarchists.

Not rocket science.


DOUBLE STANDARD ALERT!!

A couple people do something stupid, and the entire group is labeled anarchists.

However, when the Tea Partiers were attacking people and putting up openly racists signs, it was considered taboo to label the entire group.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:47 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Squanto wrote:
However, when the Tea Partiers were attacking people and putting up openly racists signs, it was considered taboo to label the entire group.

Taboo?
Bullshit, it was open season.

Quote:
The Democratic National Committee called the tea partiers "angry mobs" and "rabid right-wing extremists." ABC said they were a "mob." CNN accused them of "rabble rousing." Harry Reid called them "evil mongers." Nancy Pelosi said they were "un-American." CNN's Anderson Cooper and every single host on MSNBC called the tea partiers a name that referred to a sex act.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
acrossthelines
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 2:06 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 4192
I wish this movement had discernible goals. it is difficult to cut through all the BS about it out there, propagated by people who have no idea why they are there and by such things as the dissemination (one example in particular) of a list of 20 "goals" of OWS that was actually created originally to mock the movement but is now quoted as a legitimate list, kind of like how some can mistake articles from The Onion as news. I can't bring myself to form any kind of opinion about the whole thing because anything I would judge would probably be unfair, either weighted too heavily to one side or the other or just flat-out made up.

There are plenty of kids who have made foolish decisions involved, sure (then again, in the past three years pay for new college grads has dropped about 10% while those having to take jobs that don't require college degrees has gone up 17%, though watching friends who graduated this year, all of whom are working jobs like that right now, it's taken all of them 150-300 applications throughout an entire state before someone calls them back because they're overqualified with a college degree... not including apps to starting positions requiring their degrees, which aren't biting either). My exposure to it via internet discussion forums, however, has been not to kids but to those in middle age who have lost everything for no reason. I'm more familiar with this:
Quote:
I was a teen mom, but I did everything right from that point. I got married, dh and I both have degrees, we saved, we invested, and now we have nothing.

Besides rent, medical debt is our largest bill every month. No one wants to take less than $100 per month, but the bills are spread out so that I owe the hospital this much, the doctors who treated me this much, etc. If I pay them each what they want, it is more than $400 per month. We earn $1600 per month and I get $500 in child support for my oldest. It is.not.happening. But if I don't pay what they demand, they tack on a fee in addition to the exorbitant interest. So we end up with an equal or larger bill every month even though we pay religiously. srsly, wtf. Also, they are religious reporters to credit agencies, so I recently found out that my formerly excellent credit score is now comparable to someone who has filed bankruptcy.

In my state, most adults can't get Medicaid. You have to be disabled or??? I don't even know! I have a non-disabled friend who gets it and I wish I knew how--she makes more than me but gets more food stamps, plus HUD and medical and an electric/utility discount. When I asked about it at DSHS, they told me I was not categorically eligible. I wish I could get a firm definition on that phrase because I hear it a lot. Luckily, our food stamps were increased to $400 per month. So we will eat at least.


Honestly, most of the time people are getting screwed over because their employers have raised the rates of health insurance due to passing the buck to employees, to a level that they can no longer afford. One member of the family is hospitalized at some point, and everything is lost as a result. The poster I quoted above has explained in subsequent posts that they have moved to a terrible apartment and greatly downsized their lives, but it doesn't matter. This is something that could happen to anyone. My parents could easily be in this position within a few years, and my father has worked his ass off his entire life, going from being a high school dropout to comfortably raising five children and sending them all to private high school (when I was a child we still had nothing while my father was in college, but my younger brothers never had that experience).

I will be there with a nursing degree in a couple of years. I will not have the money to support myself, even if I drive the worst POS car and live in the most disgusting apartment I can find, because of my debt which was originally not going to give me a useless degree because of how I was going to use it but now cannot because to do so would be foolish in this economy. I will not be able to afford health insurance even if I do those things as well as go on food stamps. I will not be able to save anything. I will not have any extra dollars to spare if my car needs new tires or anything else that will come up. I know this. There is nothing I can do about it, for no reason other than that I'm going to be entering the workforce at a really bad time. I am getting my nursing degree because my bachelor's degree in psychology is almost useless, and there is absolutely no way I can afford grad school (nursing school is only $10-12/credit). I have completely changed my plan for life in response to the economy, and there is still nothing I can do, no amount of time I can work, that will bring me out of poverty. I am intelligent, I readily work 50+ hours a week during the summer, and there is still nothing for me, and that's without any dependents. That kind of thing is what I've been exposed to, only instead of college kids it's happening to those who are in middle age because of changes their employers have made.

This is more a commentary of the economy than anything else, though, which is why I wish this movement had more cohesive, readily available goals to critique. All I can gather is that people in these positions are fed up that while banks make record profits with money they have gained from those who have lost it all, and as CEOs' salaries have gone up 23% (I think?) since 2009, there is no "bailout" that will be afforded to people who have worked hard and made the "right" decisions their entire lives only to crash from middle class to working poor, while banks were bailed out in 2008 for things that were their own doing. They don't want a handout and are willing to work as hard as they always have to get themselves out of their situations; they do want those responsible for what is happening to them to be held accountable. I honestly am not well-versed in the relationship between the government and banks and the economy, so I don't know how accurate their analysis of everything is. I just know what my exposure to this movement has been.

_________________
Miles to go before I sleep

‎"Love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation."
-Khalil Gibran


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 2:14 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
I just can't get on the sympathy bandwagon for anyone complaining about voluntary debt.

Medical bills in your example above can indeed be dealt with but that person sounds like they've thrown up their hands.
Quote:
No one wants to take less than $100 per month

WTF does that mean?
This person needs help in dealing with collections.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
acrossthelines
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 2:28 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 4192
Crosscheck wrote:
Medical bills in your example above can indeed be dealt with but that person sounds like they've thrown up their hands.
Quote:
No one wants to take less than $100 per month

WTF does that mean?
This person needs help in dealing with collections.


lol, I agree. I just used that one because it was the first one in that thread, and I was lazy.

As for me, my parents were going to help me pay off loans, but not anymore. Can't transfer my senior year; no college will allow that. In my situation I wouldn't classify my debt as entirely voluntary because I began all of this with the supposed knowledge that they would be able to help, but throughout my college career the economy's gotten twice as bad, and they can't do it anymore (and still send my brothers to private school... but that's my own contention with them, not anyone else's :P ). I always expected to be in debt and was never naive about that, and it's manageable at the amount I was expecting, but not this. Not asking for sympathy, just the absence of condemnation.

_________________
Miles to go before I sleep

‎"Love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation."
-Khalil Gibran


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 2:35 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
acrossthelines wrote:
As for me, my parents were going to help me pay off loans, but not anymore

Yikes...that blows.

for the record I my post wasn't directed at anyone, I've just read a lot of those manifestos on http://wearethe99percent.tumblr.com/ and it seems a large number of them are pretty much the same thing.

"I have a degree I paid $200k for and now I can't find a job. My credit is crap because of it and I can afford the life I want right now"
...people with degrees in things like political science and social work.

Well that certainly sucks, but don't complain about your personal debt as if it's the fault of someone else.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 2:52 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
man...I just went back to that site again and this is unreal...from 1 page alone:

Quote:
Age: 27
Degree: BA in Creative Writing. I want my MFA, but I can’t afford it.
Debt: $20,000 in student loans (AFTER receiving merit scholarships that required a 3.7 GPA - I was a Cum Laude graduate.)
$10,000+ in credit card debt (from the unemployed years, part one.) I can’t afford to pay any of it. Creditors call every day.

Quote:
I graduated 6 months ago with a BA in psychology and education. I need AT LEAST a Master’s to do anything in psychology.
When did my education become irrelevant? Will a Master’s even matter?

Quote:
I am 22 years old & in debt from one semester of college. I had to drop out for personal reasons. I owe SO much in loans. I’m scared to go back to college & put myself in more debt.

Quote:
I studied environmental science and Spanish, I thought for sure that in the four years I was in school between 2006 and 2010 that the green job market would be created and well on its way to solving our dependency on oil. How wrong I was!

Quote:
With an MA in Middle Eastern Studies from one of the top universities in the world, I’ve been unemployed for most of the past 2 years. Mostly because I couldn’t afford to work unpaid internships to make the connections to get jobs.


I see a systemic problem here...

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
Squanto
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 2:58 pm 
Offline
Carlos Spicy-Wiener
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:31 am
Posts: 9240
Location: FAP TURBO
Yes, they made a choice for that education. (In some cases, lied to about job prospects by for-profit colleges, but that's another story. )

However, you can't deny that some of that frustration is caused by how business acts these days. When we were kids, we were all told that you NEEDED a degree to get a good job. Used to be that you couldn't even get an interview unless you had a bachelors. Now, lots of places won't even look at you IF you have a degree because they'd rather take the cheap labor from someone who does not.

Yes, these people made choices to go to expensive schools. However, wouldn't you say there's a systemic problem when people who get good degrees from good schools have no opportunity to get decent jobs because of how businesses operate these days?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 344 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: