It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 2:19 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Who will you vote for in the GOP Primary?
Michele Bachmann 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Herman Cain 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Newt Gingrich 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Jon Huntsman, Jr. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Ron Paul 43%  43%  [ 6 ]
Rick Perry 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Mitt Romney 36%  36%  [ 5 ]
Rick Santorum 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
None of the above 21%  21%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 14
Author Message
PatGreen
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 7:32 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
Mr. Natural wrote:
I didn't know he was a Republican.

Image

no, just a child rapist.

/toomuchhalloweenwikipedia


Top
 Profile  
 
Stuuuuuuu
PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:18 am 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 2876
Location: Portland, Oregano
Mr. Natural wrote:
CriminallyVu1gar wrote:
The only GOP "candidate" I'd vote for over Obama is Fred Karger.


I didn't know he was a Republican.

Image

Are you kidding? He embodies their platform. Invade people's dreams and kill them in their sleep. (Oh, but protect the unborn babies) :dance: <----Emoticon, see I'm not serious :whistle:


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:59 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
Here's why Herman Cain's 9-9-9 plan sucks. Be prepared to scroll, but remember that this is still to scale.

Image

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
Mr. Natural
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 6:21 pm 
Offline
7th Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:45 pm
Posts: 279
Location: A higher plane
CNN/TIME Poll: Romney Leads Republican Rivals in First Four Primary States
http://swampland.time.com/2011/10/26/ti ... ernational

Romney leads in all four states among all demographic groups, including one that caught my eye: "moderate or liberal” Republicans.

What exactly are "liberal Republicans?" I know there used to be sightings of the species in the '60s, especially in the northeast, but where exactly are they today and what constitutes "liberal" in the Grand Old Party?

_________________
th' only knower of th' cosmic mysteries alive at this time


Top
 Profile  
 
SABRESAllTheWay
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 6:44 pm 
Offline
MegaDouche
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:41 am
Posts: 2752
Location: Fairfax, VA
NYIntensity wrote:
If you voted for him last time, you already proved you're not racist...you don't have to do it again.

Technically, isn't that racist by saying people voted for him to prove they're not racist?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:33 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
SABRESAllTheWay wrote:
NYIntensity wrote:
If you voted for him last time, you already proved you're not racist...you don't have to do it again.

Technically, isn't that racist by saying people voted for him to prove they're not racist?

I'd like you to explain the "technical" logic used to qualify this as "technically racist"

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:18 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Mr. Natural wrote:
What exactly are "liberal Republicans?" I know there used to be sightings of the species in the '60s, especially in the northeast, but where exactly are they today and what constitutes "liberal" in the Grand Old Party?


The definition of a NeoCon is a "Liberal mugged by reality".
These would be a lot of your libertarians...people who are socially more liberal but fiscally conservative.

...and don't forget the "Reagan Democrats"....Some Democrats who are aligned with a more hawkish foreign policy.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:47 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
Ron Paul, or this country fails yet again at electing a president that's willing to actually address our real issues.

We need a balanced budget, we need the promote peace and bring our troops home, we need to reallocate the money we spend on militarism to self defense (seriously... this cyber warfare is the next big thing, and we're lagging far behind in that) and we need a guy that can't be bought by the corporate fat cats.

Oh and most importantly, we need a politician that will respect our constitution.

Fuck Obama. I can't believe I voted for that scum bag. What an idiot I was.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:51 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
Crosscheck wrote:
Mr. Natural wrote:
What exactly are "liberal Republicans?" I know there used to be sightings of the species in the '60s, especially in the northeast, but where exactly are they today and what constitutes "liberal" in the Grand Old Party?


The definition of a NeoCon is a "Liberal mugged by reality".


...which is why I have a hard time believing a CNN poll saying that Romney is the favorite among young people in those states.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
acrossthelines
PostPosted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:36 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 4192
NYIntensity wrote:
Here's why Herman Cain's 9-9-9 plan sucks. Be prepared to scroll, but remember that this is still to scale.

*snip*


I first saw this a couple weeks ago. Ever since I've been sooooorely tempted to send it to the few Herman Cain supporters I know. It's ridiculous.

_________________
Miles to go before I sleep

‎"Love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation."
-Khalil Gibran


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 8:14 am 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
acrossthelines wrote:
NYIntensity wrote:
Here's why Herman Cain's 9-9-9 plan sucks. Be prepared to scroll, but remember that this is still to scale.

*snip*


I first saw this a couple weeks ago. Ever since I've been sooooorely tempted to send it to the few Herman Cain supporters I know. It's ridiculous.


You should. He's spoon feeding people sugar coated bullshit, and they think it tastes delicious. It does - until you chew.

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
backthatSASSup
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 9:49 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1549
Location: BuffaLOVE
We were having a discussion in class the other day about these new tax proposals and how they are just gimmicky, including Perry's flat tax. Not that I'm saying our current tax system doesn't need to be revamped, but a flat tax or 9-9-9 is not the answer. Unfortunately, many people are tax ignorant and don't know what they're hearing.

Everyone thinks a flat tax sounds nice and easy, until one realizes that ONLY ordinary income will be taxed, meaning that wealthy hedge fund managers (these people make millions per year) will pay ZERO tax. People like Warren Buffet will pay little to no taxes because a majority of their income is from capital gains. Also, how do you decide which deductions are fair and which aren't? Pretty sure a corporation wouldn't be happy with paying taxes on their revenues without any deductions for cost of goods sold, wages paid, etc. Things start to get complicated again.


Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:04 am 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Fuck Obama. I can't believe I voted for that scum bag. What an idiot I was.



PSP i'm curious what exactly you hate about him so much that you'd refer to him as a scum bag?


Top
 Profile  
 
PatGreen
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:14 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
backthatSASSup wrote:
Not that I'm saying our current tax system doesn't need to be revamped, but a flat tax or 9-9-9 is not the answer.

Everyone thinks a flat tax sounds nice and easy, until one realizes that ONLY ordinary income will be taxed, meaning that wealthy hedge fund managers (these people make millions per year) will pay ZERO tax. People like Warren Buffet will pay little to no taxes because a majority of their income is from capital gains. ain.

I'm almost sure the 9-9-9 is 9% capital gains tax too.

we also need to remember who REALLY pays taxes. A lot of people/families get a lot back in April. single young adults get the least back, as far as a percentage return. we don't have kids, we claim 0 or 1, don't qualify for EIC, student loans don't get to be written off, and unless you're still in college, we don't really qualify for anything. so the government gets to take 15-20% of my income. then family a with two kids and enough salary between the parents to be doing okay get everything back and maybe some more, so basically the feds just took a 0% interest loan out and counted it as income.


Top
 Profile  
 
backthatSASSup
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:48 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1549
Location: BuffaLOVE
PatGreen wrote:
I'm almost sure the 9-9-9 is 9% capital gains tax too.

we also need to remember who REALLY pays taxes. A lot of people/families get a lot back in April. single young adults get the least back, as far as a percentage return. we don't have kids, we claim 0 or 1, don't qualify for EIC, student loans don't get to be written off, and unless you're still in college, we don't really qualify for anything. so the government gets to take 15-20% of my income. then family a with two kids and enough salary between the parents to be doing okay get everything back and maybe some more, so basically the feds just took a 0% interest loan out and counted it as income.


9-9-9 Plan: Summary

Removes all payroll taxes and unites all tax payers
Provides the least incentive to evade taxes and the fewest opportunities to do so
Lifts a $430 billion dead-weight burden on the economy due to compliance, enforcement, collection, etc…
Is fair, simple, efficient, neutral, and transparent
Ends nearly all deductions and special interest favors
Features zero tax on capital gains and repatriated profits
Exports leave our shores without the Business Tax or the Sales Tax embedded in their cost, making them world class competitive. Imports are subject to the same taxation as domestically produced goods, leveling the playing field.
Lowest marginal rates on production
Kills the Death Tax
Allows immediate expensing of business investments
Eliminates double taxation of dividends
Increases capital formation which aids capital availability for small businesses
Increased capital per worker drives productivity and wage growth
Features a platform to launch properly structured Empowerment Zones to renew our inner cities
The pro-growth, pro-job, pro-export economic policies of the 9-9-9 PLAN equals a strong dollar policy

Source: http://www.hermancain.com/999plan


Top
 Profile  
 
PatGreen
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:53 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:55 pm
Posts: 1836
word. i wasn't really contesting, i just thought i remembered him yelling "9% income tax, 9% capital gains tax, 9% somethingsomething tax"


Top
 Profile  
 
backthatSASSup
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:12 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1549
Location: BuffaLOVE
PatGreen wrote:
word. i wasn't really contesting, i just thought i remembered him yelling "9% income tax, 9% capital gains tax, 9% somethingsomething tax"


No, I didn't think you were! I just wanted to show that aspect of it because I think it's pretty important.


Top
 Profile  
 
acrossthelines
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:17 pm 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 4192
backthatSASSup wrote:
We were having a discussion in class the other day about these new tax proposals and how they are just gimmicky, including Perry's flat tax. Not that I'm saying our current tax system doesn't need to be revamped, but a flat tax or 9-9-9 is not the answer. Unfortunately, many people are tax ignorant and don't know what they're hearing.

Everyone thinks a flat tax sounds nice and easy, until one realizes that ONLY ordinary income will be taxed, meaning that wealthy hedge fund managers (these people make millions per year) will pay ZERO tax. People like Warren Buffet will pay little to no taxes because a majority of their income is from capital gains. Also, how do you decide which deductions are fair and which aren't? Pretty sure a corporation wouldn't be happy with paying taxes on their revenues without any deductions for cost of goods sold, wages paid, etc. Things start to get complicated again.


How much (if at all) are capital gains currently taxed? I ask because I honestly am not sure, and I have of course seen the quote from Warren Buffet that his secretary pays more in taxes than he does (I think he said it in the context of illustrating what is wrong with the way taxes currently are). Predominantly I'm asking because of the Warren Buffet quote. :P

_________________
Miles to go before I sleep

‎"Love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation."
-Khalil Gibran


Top
 Profile  
 
Sabresfansince1980
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:04 pm 
Offline
Star Sniper
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:45 pm
Posts: 3021
Location: So far away
The capital gains tax is 15%. IMO there's nothing to complain about with that, because that money has already been taxed as income, and is now being used for investment. Any capital gains tax is a double tax - taxing money that has been taxed once already.

If a person or business can be successful enough through the years of normal income tax, and then use the profit to make much more through investment at a lower tax rate...I really don't see the problem. Didn't the Beatles make a song about this that would really seem to be against any capital gains tax at all?


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 2:52 pm 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Fuck Obama. I can't believe I voted for that scum bag. What an idiot I was.


PSP i'm curious what exactly you hate about him so much that you'd refer to him as a scum bag?


Lied to get into office. I voted for him on the basis that he'd pull our troops home immediately. I also voted for him because he stated he'd make government more transparent, which he hasn't done. In fact, he's done the opposite.



I also don't want a President that shits on the most holy document in American history by going to war with countries without a declaration and permission from congress. It wasn't his call to get us involved in Libya, but he made it anyways.

Those are dangerous precedents that we can't allow to be set. Once you sacrifice one aspect, the rest begin to follow.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: