It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 5:43 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Who will you vote for in the GOP Primary?
Michele Bachmann 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Herman Cain 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Newt Gingrich 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Jon Huntsman, Jr. 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Ron Paul 43%  43%  [ 6 ]
Rick Perry 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Mitt Romney 36%  36%  [ 5 ]
Rick Santorum 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
None of the above 21%  21%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 14
Author Message
YankeeInRaleigh
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:07 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Fuck Obama. I can't believe I voted for that scum bag. What an idiot I was.


PSP i'm curious what exactly you hate about him so much that you'd refer to him as a scum bag?


I also don't want a President that shits on the most holy document in American history by going to war with countries without a declaration and permission from congress. It wasn't his call to get us involved in Libya, but he made it anyways.

Those are dangerous precedents that we can't allow to be set. Once you sacrifice one aspect, the rest begin to follow.


While I agree with you on the transparency, I dont understand your gripe with libya. Correct me if i'm wrong but we werent at war with libya. We didnt send in ground troops...and the entire thing cost us a billion dollars, instead of the trillion+ that W's wars are costing us. If anything the way he handled the libya situation should be a plus for him (especially considering how badly you want us out of the actual wars we're in) in that he assembled a bit of a coalition and we didnt have to do all the 'heavy lifting' ourselves.

Is he more of a scumbag than the guy who got us into two simultaneous wars?


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:15 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong but we werent at war with libya.

Technically we're not at war with Iraq or Afghanistan either so that's a moot point....or at least open to interpretation.
Quote:
We didnt send in ground troops...and the entire thing cost us a billion dollars, instead of the trillion+ that W's wars are costing us. If anything the way he handled the libya situation should be a plus for him (especially considering how badly you want us out of the actual wars we're in) in that he assembled a bit of a coalition and we didnt have to do all the 'heavy lifting' ourselves.

Engaging in any sort of military action by executive fiat is fucked up...everyone should agree with that....even W went to congress (controlled by Democrats) before the UN...Obama just went to the UN.
And he didn't build a coalition...it was a NATO action...just as Iraq and Afghanistan are.
France just has a national interest in Libya so they were willing to take the lead.

The real question raised by the action in Libya is why the hell are we not in Syria?
If anything there's a 100x better case to be made for that.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:34 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
Crosscheck wrote:
The real question raised by the action in Libya is why the hell are we not in Syria?
If anything there's a 100x better case to be made for that.



I dont envy Obama having to deal with our role in any sort of arab spring...seems like a 'damned if you do/dont' scenario.

And from my vantage point the action in libya raises the question of 'how come W didnt find some way to accomplish our international fighting goals without spending a trillion freaking dollars doing it?'


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:46 pm 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
Because we went to Iraq with the projected attitude that we would kick ass then help rebuild.
We won in a matter of days....it's the stabilize and rebuild that's a bitch.

Afghanistan is just Afghanistan, ask the Russians, that place just needs to go away, it can't be fixed.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
YankeeInRaleigh
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:58 pm 
Offline
Franchise Defenseman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:58 pm
Posts: 2631
Location: Take a guess...
Crosscheck wrote:
Because we went to Iraq with the projected attitude that we would kick ass then help rebuild.
We won in a matter of days....it's the stabilize and rebuild that's a bitch.


And it doesnt bother you immensely that you just encapsulated our apparent exit strategy?
Step 1: Get country into absolute shitstorm
Step 2:
Step 3: Exit rebuilt Iraq!

Crosscheck wrote:
Afghanistan is just Afghanistan, ask the Russians, that place just needs to go away, it can't be fixed.


Yeah, I think everyone agrees with you. Too bad we weren't smart enough to learn the lesson the russians had just spent a decade teaching the world.


Top
 Profile  
 
ksquier89
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 5:03 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:13 pm
Posts: 1687
Location: Harford County, Maryland
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Fuck Obama. I can't believe I voted for that scum bag. What an idiot I was.


PSP i'm curious what exactly you hate about him so much that you'd refer to him as a scum bag?


I also don't want a President that shits on the most holy document in American history by going to war with countries without a declaration and permission from congress. It wasn't his call to get us involved in Libya, but he made it anyways.

Those are dangerous precedents that we can't allow to be set. Once you sacrifice one aspect, the rest begin to follow.


While I agree with you on the transparency, I dont understand your gripe with libya. Correct me if i'm wrong but we werent at war with libya. We didnt send in ground troops...and the entire thing cost us a billion dollars, instead of the trillion+ that W's wars are costing us. If anything the way he handled the libya situation should be a plus for him (especially considering how badly you want us out of the actual wars we're in) in that he assembled a bit of a coalition and we didnt have to do all the 'heavy lifting' ourselves.

Is he more of a scumbag than the guy who got us into two simultaneous wars?


Not to gripe on your gripe but we did have ground forces in Libya. Guess you missed that memo. We have also just dropped boots on the ground in Africa. 100 special forces are running about the african landscape trying killing off a man who considers himself god. We also have opened hundreds of small airstrips for our drones. BTW the drone airstrikes we started is in fact an act of war with Pakistan. Obama is pissing on their faces when it comes to us respecting their sovereignty. We just pay them money to shut the fuck up. So since Dumbo has taken office he has opened more military fob'S, not closed GITMO, saved backing out of one war until his campaigning for 2012, gone to war with Libya, informally declared war with central Africa, and started an air based military campaign in Pakistan. I'll leave Syria alone.

Nobel Peace Prize my ass. War monger.


Top
 Profile  
 
BagBoy
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:21 pm 
Offline
Face-Off Specialist
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 713
Location: Greensboro, NC via 14052
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Fuck Obama. I can't believe I voted for that scum bag. What an idiot I was.


PSP i'm curious what exactly you hate about him so much that you'd refer to him as a scum bag?


Lied to get into office. I voted for him on the basis that he'd pull our troops home immediately. I also voted for him because he stated he'd make government more transparent, which he hasn't done. In fact, he's done the opposite.

I also don't want a President that shits on the most holy document in American history by going to war with countries without a declaration and permission from congress. It wasn't his call to get us involved in Libya, but he made it anyways.

Those are dangerous precedents that we can't allow to be set. Once you sacrifice one aspect, the rest begin to follow.

I'm not disagreeing and I'm not trying to change your mind. However, every prez lies when he campaigns, and every prez tries to increase executive powers (remember that last guy?).
Just as a crazy example, let's say we let you and you alone pick every prez for the rest of your life (choosing only actual candidates). I can almost guarantee that you would not be 100% happy with ANY of them by the time their terms were up. Probably not even 75% happy with ANY of them. Let's face it. Anyone running for prez is a politician. And any politician whose efforts have gotten him or her to the level of presidential candidate is going to say and do ANYTHING to become or stay prez.

_________________
This time, like all times, is a very good one, if we but know what to do with it.
--Emerson


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:28 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
PuckSniperPensel wrote:

I also don't want a President that shits on the most holy document in American history by going to war with countries without a declaration and permission from congress.



better get used to it. this is not something new.

obama wasnt the first to do so. he wont be the last.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
ksquier89
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:33 pm 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:13 pm
Posts: 1687
Location: Harford County, Maryland
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:

I also don't want a President that shits on the most holy document in American history by going to war with countries without a declaration and permission from congress.



better get used to it. this is not something new.

obama wasnt the first to do so. he wont be the last.


Most recent wars have been fought without congressional approval. It is basically commonplace for anyone to shit on congress, at free will.


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:40 pm 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
ksquier89 wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:

I also don't want a President that shits on the most holy document in American history by going to war with countries without a declaration and permission from congress.



better get used to it. this is not something new.

obama wasnt the first to do so. he wont be the last.


Most recent wars have been fought without congressional approval. It is basically commonplace for anyone to shit on congress, at free will.


exactly. so its not a new trend, and one that will continue.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:18 am 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
ksquier89 wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:

I also don't want a President that shits on the most holy document in American history by going to war with countries without a declaration and permission from congress.



better get used to it. this is not something new.

obama wasnt the first to do so. he wont be the last.


Most recent wars have been fought without congressional approval. It is basically commonplace for anyone to shit on congress, at free will.


exactly. so its not a new trend, and one that will continue.


It doesn't have to. American citizens could care a little bit more about this sort of thing and put an end to it. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are two examples of both left and right politicians who have campaigned on the fact that they're defenders of the constitution.

The problem is, the American public doesn't seem to give this issue the light of day. Unfortunately, I think that's what happens as time travels further from a revolution. The horror of governmental oppression and fear of its return becomes atrophied.

Whatever. My vote isn't going to a President that disregards the Constitution.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:26 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
ksquier89 wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:

I also don't want a President that shits on the most holy document in American history by going to war with countries without a declaration and permission from congress.



better get used to it. this is not something new.

obama wasnt the first to do so. he wont be the last.


Most recent wars have been fought without congressional approval. It is basically commonplace for anyone to shit on congress, at free will.


exactly. so its not a new trend, and one that will continue.


It doesn't have to. American citizens could care a little bit more about this sort of thing and put an end to it. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are two examples of both left and right politicians who have campaigned on the fact that they're defenders of the constitution.

The problem is, the American public doesn't seem to give this issue the light of day. Unfortunately, I think that's what happens as time travels further from a revolution. The horror of governmental oppression and fear of its return becomes atrophied.

Whatever. My vote isn't going to a President that disregards the Constitution.


no skin off my ass, i couldnt bring myself to vote for a conservative person. so he has mine again.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Crosscheck
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:09 am 
Offline
Sober enough to run a server
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:10 am
Posts: 7477
Location: 2,568 miles from the F'n arena
YankeeInRaleigh wrote:
And it doesnt bother you immensely that you just encapsulated our apparent exit strategy?

Yes, of course it does.
Quote:
Yeah, I think everyone agrees with you. Too bad we weren't smart enough to learn the lesson the russians had just spent a decade teaching the world.

Unfortunately, you're right.
The Taliban are licking their chops right now and looking at us like the n00b we are.

I'd also bet real money (Euros or Yuan) Egypt and Libya are about to transition from secular dictatorships to Islamic theocracies.

_________________
Hold my beer and watch this...


Top
 Profile  
 
PuckSniperPensel
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:28 am 
Offline
Page Side
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 6537
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
ksquier89 wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
PuckSniperPensel wrote:

I also don't want a President that shits on the most holy document in American history by going to war with countries without a declaration and permission from congress.



better get used to it. this is not something new.

obama wasnt the first to do so. he wont be the last.


Most recent wars have been fought without congressional approval. It is basically commonplace for anyone to shit on congress, at free will.


exactly. so its not a new trend, and one that will continue.


It doesn't have to. American citizens could care a little bit more about this sort of thing and put an end to it. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are two examples of both left and right politicians who have campaigned on the fact that they're defenders of the constitution.

The problem is, the American public doesn't seem to give this issue the light of day. Unfortunately, I think that's what happens as time travels further from a revolution. The horror of governmental oppression and fear of its return becomes atrophied.

Whatever. My vote isn't going to a President that disregards the Constitution.


no skin off my ass, i couldnt bring myself to vote for a conservative person. so he has mine again.


That kind of attitude is one of the biggest problems facing politics and the future of this country in general.

_________________
Wheelhouse


Top
 Profile  
 
ironyisadeadscene
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:03 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:01 pm
Posts: 15390
Location: michigan
not really. like i said, its no skin off my ass who you vote for, i myself am a liberal and will continue to vote liberal if possible.

obama represents my interests more then any other candidate. in fact, every other candidate is opposite of my interests.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
CriminallyVu1gar
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:46 am 
Offline
Captain Dynasty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 16859
I would have voted for Kucinich. He has a hot wife.

_________________
Proud LGBTQQ Individual


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:31 am 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
not really. like i said, its no skin off my ass who you vote for, i myself am a liberal and will continue to vote liberal if possible.

obama represents my interests more then any other candidate. in fact, every other candidate is opposite of my interests.


So you enjoy paying for other people's rides through life?

What "liberal" policies do you embrace, or hold most dear to your heart?

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
backthatSASSup
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:31 am 
Offline
PP Quarterback
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1549
Location: BuffaLOVE
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
not really. like i said, its no skin off my ass who you vote for, i myself am a liberal and will continue to vote liberal if possible.

obama represents my interests more then any other candidate. in fact, every other candidate is opposite of my interests.


I'm with you on this.


Top
 Profile  
 
NYIntensity
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:45 am 
Offline
Superstar Goalie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 4463
backthatSASSup wrote:
ironyisadeadscene wrote:
not really. like i said, its no skin off my ass who you vote for, i myself am a liberal and will continue to vote liberal if possible.

obama represents my interests more then any other candidate. in fact, every other candidate is opposite of my interests.


I'm with you on this.


You also have the option to 'not vote'.

_________________
ksquier89 wrote:
Holy fucking fuck...Boyes couldn't suck a dick if it landed in his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
Rutledge222
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:33 am 
Offline
Power Forward
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:36 am
Posts: 1486
Ron Paul or bust. he is the only GOP candidate that is mentally sane.... the rest are bat shit crazy.

_________________
Image
LETS GO BUFFALO!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 130 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: