PuckSniperPensel wrote:
Lets take a look at the teams that have won the cup since the lockout, as well as the runners up, shall we?
2006 Carolina Hurricanes (EC) Peter Laviolette Edmonton Oilers (WC) Craig MacTavish 4–3
2007 Anaheim Ducks (WC) Randy Carlyle Ottawa Senators (EC) Bryan Murray 4–1
2008 Detroit Red Wings (WC) Mike Babcock Pittsburgh Penguins (EC) Michel Therrien 4–2
2009 Pittsburgh Penguins (EC) Dan Bylsma Detroit Red Wings (WC) Mike Babcock 4–3
2010 Chicago Blackhawks (WC) Joel Quenneville Philadelphia Flyers (EC) Peter Laviolette 4–2
2011 Boston Bruins (EC) Claude Julien Vancouver Canucks (WC) Alain Vigneault 4–3
What do all of these cup winners have in common? They had the right balance of size and skill, as well as a big time mean streak to their games.
What did all the cup losers have in common, outside of MAYBE Pittsburgh? They weren't tough enough to match the physicality of their opposition.
Having said that, lets take a look at the Sabres starting defense, and tell me which players opposing forwards are supposed to be afraid of going into the corners?
Regehr-Myers
Ehrhoff-Leopold
Gragnani-Sekera
....
The sizable Red Wings showed us last night just how ineffective our defense is at knocking them off the puck. This team isn't a Stanley Cup team. Not even close.
Gotta run for now, but I'm going to pick on the forwards too, and then propose some trade ideas.
I gotta disagree wholeheartedly with this post. First of all, are the Sabres good enough to win the cup right now? No, of course they're not, but it's early December, they've been racked with injuries, and have a lot of new pieces trying to find chemistry. But there's a reason the playoffs start in April, and they will be a more cohesive team by then.
Secondly, about the toughness... I think you are overreacting to the one Boston game. I don't think their lack of toughness has had much of anything to do with their current situation. I've witnessed a major lack of finish on scoring chances (not a lack of chances) and a litany of unforced turnovers and mental errors. To me, these are correctable deficits.
Third, you really think Vancouver, Philly, and Detroit lost the last 3 cups because they weren't tough enough? Boston won that series (in 7 games no less) largely because Thomas was a wall and Luongo sucked. Detroit also lost by a single goal in game 7, so you can't argue they weren't tough enough to win. I'll give you the Senators, but they're the only one on that list that was clearly dominated by a physically superior opponent.
Also, look at the Lightning last year, one game and one goal away from the finals, and against the big bad Bruins no less. If a team like Tampa, with limited skill and a 42 yo goaltender, can compete with Boston and be a contender for the cup, I can't look at this Sabres team and agree with your statement that they aren't even close. I think Myers, Regehr, and Ehrhoff are capable of carrying this team defensively, and if McNabb or Weber develop and contribute as stay at home, physical defensemen, I'm okay with this D moving forward.
I'm not saying that they should sit pat and not look to improve. And yeah, they've laid a few eggs this year, including against Detroit. But that's gonna happen over the course of a long season, there will be some really bad games. Let's see how they look in mid February.